Here we go again
You can do whatever you want. And listen to whomever you want. I really don't give a shyt. It's all just fodder for pointless "wars."So, we should ignore the truth the Elder is speaking because it was posted by a Twitter account you do not like. The experience of a person does not become invalid based on who else is posting it.
Man it's just Internet Ass Muhfukkas that have no idea wtf they believe or want. So long as it ends with them being mad at the diaspora.If I was a betting man, I would say these threads are coordinated by maga posters.

That top flight security. Even being disingenuous for themBut yall aint mad enough
That man was NOT a Black American, he was Jamaican. What's so hard claiming that? Except he did. And THAT'S the fukkin problem.
![]()

Man it's just Internet Ass Muhfukkas that have no idea wtf they believe or want. So long as it ends with them being mad at the diaspora.
John Carlos is Jamaican too (and Cuban) so is it a problem that he said he's Black? And was trying to tell another Jamaican he is too? Cuz I coulda SWORE that was the problem and now these b*stards are leaning into it![]()
That top flight security. Even being disingenuous for them
![]()
What war? There is no war. There is only bickering that both sides participate in. Real wars have tangible consequences, this family bickering only has hurt feelings and gaslighting. I say let the problems be aired, argued, and then hopefully resolved. Hiding away from the problems we have with each other allows those problems to fester and never have a chance of being resolved.You can do whatever you want. And listen to whomever you want. I really don't give a shyt. It's all just fodder for pointless "wars."


A common tactic used on here. The truth suddenly becomes “invalidated” because they don’t like the source of the account.So, we should ignore the truth the Elder is speaking because it was posted by a Twitter account you do not like. The experience of a person does not become invalid based on who else is posting it.
A common tactic used on here. The truth suddenly becomes “invalidated” because they don’t like the source of the account.
I’ve posted videos from accounts I don’t even follow but because they were “right winged”, they deflected from the actual topic. Anything to not focus on the issue at hand.
A common tactic used on here. The truth suddenly becomes “invalidated” because they don’t like the source of the account.
I’ve posted videos from accounts I don’t even follow but because they were “right winged”, they deflected from the actual topic. Anything to not focus on the issue at hand.
This is how I know common sense is uncommon. For example, if there’s a news article with a video I can’t embed, I search for it on twitter. The video shows up and I post it.Well why not just say it straight up and not LIE
Say yes you follow right wing accounts or will get your news from them
That is the issue. Pretending one does not follow those accounts or get info from them.
"I just happened to come across this on my timeline" bullshyt
