Black anger, racism and hypocrisy doesn't fuel AM/sports radio.
White racism, hypocrisy and denial like yours though create a WFAN

Black anger, racism and hypocrisy doesn't fuel AM/sports radio.
White racism, hypocrisy and denial like yours though create a WFAN

Typical cac still dancing around questions like a fakkit ass white politicianTypical angry black man reponse
The non "existence" of detractors is "my" argument?You're blind if you don't think Gronk has detractors. Calling him universally loved is a flat out lie.
But there's nothing Gronk does that's really all that harmful. He stays out of trouble and enjoys getting laid.
You know exactly what his point was. He said why are topics on race the only time you come into threads stating the insignificance of the topic? Nearly every topic on this board is not important in the grand scheme of things but it's only topics that deal with racism and difference in how races are treated in sports media that provoke you to question why we're talking about it. Why is that? Why don't you talk about the insignificance of other topics people post on here, why only race ones?What have I deflected? That long winded non sensical post was a bunch of words without an iota of a point.
Typical cac still dancing around questions like a fakkit ass white politician
Martellus Bennett is the closest and people seem to hate him

he really just isI don't mind his antics. Dude is having fun out there.
livin that life must be fukkin crazyYou know exactly what his point was. He said why are topics on race the only time you come into threads stating the insignificance of the topic? Nearly every topic on this board is not important in the grand scheme of things but it's only topics that deal with racism and difference in how races are treated in sports media that provoke you to question why we're talking about it. Why is that? Why don't you talk about the insignificance of other topics people post on here, why only race ones?
Just curious, why are you posting in this thread?Because this specific topic is insignificant and an obvious attempt at click bait. Sorry you fell for it.

Interesting point, Barkley is probably even more relatable to Gronk than Shaq...Interesting question, Barkley might be an even better example than Shaq. Granted he's devolved into a buffoon who talks down to black people, but I think he was loved even before that.
Sometimes Dan likes to unneccarily play the race card in certain situations just to have an uncomfortable coversations like this. In this discussion I think he was pointing out the media's hypocritical view between Marshawn and Gronk.
They concluded that since Gronk wins, he gets to be the lovable buffoon.
Just curious, why are you posting in this thread?![]()
