Nah..Blandy has never been a draw in the last 11 years of his entire run. His matches had been getting 500k losses and hilarious drops for years now.orton vs bryan feud = high ratings![]()
Nah..Blandy has never been a draw in the last 11 years of his entire run. His matches had been getting 500k losses and hilarious drops for years now.orton vs bryan feud = high ratings![]()
Patently false. His crowd reactions and CONSTANTNah..Blandy has never been a draw in the last 11 years of his entire run. His matches had been getting 500k losses and hilarious drops for years now.
thank you Cena for putting over the future .......I'm having flashbacks though to hhh messing up the summer of punk with his nonsenseNOPE. RVD's quarters were consistently higher than everyone else, and when he mainevented a RAW (like vs Undertaker or vs Christian or vs Eddie Guerrero), it was comparable to attitude era overruns.I don't care what his crowd reactions are like. RVD had higher crowd reactions in 2001 than Blandy ever did and he didn't mean shyt to ratings either. LOL. He was just apart of the Rock and Austin show.
It maintained the same numbers though, that's what matters. He doesn't have to bump ratings huge or anything. I mean there have been higher ratings on RAW then the one Bryan got, but we are comparing it to other people who got significantly less ratings.He interacted with Steve Austin alot during the "who was the leader of the Alliance storyline" but he never was a fire ratings getter.

So for those making excuses and saying it's not Bryan, last year's post Summerslam show, which was centered around CM Punk picking his new number #1 contender and abusing Jerry Lawler in the last segment, scored LOWER at a 3.0
The year before that, Raw was centered around Del Rio/Cena. Del Rio cashing in the WWE title, and John Cena arguing he never lost the title to Punk because his foot was under the rope. Main event was Del Rio defending against Rey Mysterio, beating him up and then unmasking him, Cena came out fought with Del Rio and then cut a promo on Del Rio for like 5 mins. This was the infamous Nash/Punk Waffle House segment which was the middle of the show. - a similar 3.27 Rating.
Look in my eyeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees what do you seeeeeeeeeeeeeee, the ratings plummeting with me each week![]()

It maintained the same numbers though, that's what matters. He doesn't have to bump ratings huge or anything. I mean there have been higher ratings on RAW then the one Bryan got, but we are comparing it to other people who got significantly less ratings.
LOL orton is a ratings loser but he has been over for like 11 years straight main evented million buyrate PPVs and gets monster pops and molten heat year roundWTF..Blandy is ratings LOSER. Always has been..he gets attached to a Bryan storyline and he's on a Raw with a 3.2 for the first since the post WM fall out..you know shows where he was getting 500k losses or worse.
RVD was a merchandise mover and was over..he didn't change PPVs or do anything like that. There are plenty of situations like that. Razor was about as over as anyone can be in 1996 but he wasn't given the chance to headline and go over the roster like RVD did. So it's all semantics..it's all nitpicking..it's this..it's that. Whatever.
I don't know why you are doing talking about Randy, I am not disagreeing with you or agreeing with you I am not about talking about Orton right now.WTF..Blandy is ratings LOSER. Always has been..he gets attached to a Bryan storyline and he's on a Raw with a 3.2 for the first since the post WM fall out..you know shows where he was getting 500k losses or worse.
RVD was a merchandise mover and was over..he didn't change PPVs or do anything like that. There are plenty of situations like that. Razor was about as over as anyone can be in 1996 but he wasn't given the chance to headline and go over the roster like RVD did. So it's all semantics..it's all nitpicking..it's this..it's that. Whatever.
HHH, Orton and Punk had more to do with the ratings than Bryan. Wrestling fans and ratings analysis just doesn't mix.