DCCC Internal Memo on Black Lives Matter

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

4. I do not support a foreign nation exploiting the populace for its geopolitical gain. I don't play this "everybody does it" game. I demand American supremacy on the global stage, and I do not support it being done to this country.

You cant have both global empire abroad and a free democratic republic at home......spend a few minutes thinking about it and youll see why

Whats to be ashamed of?

You wanna be on Portugal status?

Portugal was an empire in the 15th century before being pwned by the Spanish and British..thats 500 years ago bruh

 

[CACtain Planet]

I demand White supremacy on the global stage

:Bronie:

 

[Red Shield]

You cant have both global empire abroad and a free democratic republic at home......spend a few minutes thinking about it and youll see why

Portugal was an empire in the 15th century before being pwned by the Spanish and British..thats 500 years ago bruh

and now most people can't even find Portugal on a map. Or think that shyt is in south america or asia

The cost of empire is high.. and people only see the benefit when ascendant. They never think of the decline

 

[5n0man]

Didnt the promise shyt to illegal immigrants tho?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Nope, it's clear the Democratic Congressional Congress strung along Black lives matter for votes but made sure to not support them in actual policy...Its like a pimp promising a hoe a nice King size bed if they suck dikk for 8 hours a day but in the end they offer them a dirty cum stained mattresses bought by @Court Dog BLM are the hoes democrats are the pimps

Pick your side b. Can't say this is bullshyt then say if true, it's a bad look. Ain't nothing like transparency to clear the disinformation.

It's all a game, been shown Sono's run's BLM from behind the scenes anyways so there goes that

#imwithher

where is the issue? it makes sense to listen to the issues and not promise something you can't deliver.

not like it says avoid and vilify blm. you know, kinda like the right has done.

The police gets to shoot people without consequence? They do not face any conviction time, regardless of evidence presented? We have the biggest incarceration population in the world and most inmates are in the system do to non-violent drugcrimes?The whole mass incarceration movement broke apart families and black and brown men are disproportionately in the system?

Oh, and because of this, I will not be voting this year.

look at your c00ning indian ass tapdancing already

Support Dixiecrats, brehs!

Not exactly, but I see nothing wrong with it. It just says no concrete policies on the spot. That makes sense, but for those who feel like the DNC is just paying them lip-service it is confirmation bias. As a rule politicians should probably not promise things on the spot that they have not thought through.

So you dismiss any Clinton criticism as conspiracy theories and yet literally believe any Russia related hot take?

You know what breh, at least you're not sneaky with it.

well that shyt is a bad thing for AA's and needs to go

You cant have both global empire abroad and a free democratic republic at home......spend a few minutes thinking about it and youll see why





Portugal was an empire in the 15th century before being pwned by the Spanish and British..thats 500 years ago bruh

:Bronie:

and now most people can't even find Portugal on a map. Or think that shyt is in south america or asia

The cost of empire is high.. and people only see the benefit when ascendant. They never think of the decline

@88m3 @Blessed Is the Man @GzUp @GinaThatAintNoDamnPuppy! @Atlrocafella @wire28

1. The guy who wrote the memo IS black. Dem Memo On "Best Practices" For "Black Lives"
   
2. He was writing it as a field manual to people on the ground on how to deal with people asking for certain answers. You have to control the narrative if you have people acting as spokespeople. There isn't a BLM platform, or wasn't at the time, so to have surrogates answering questions they can't handle, isn't the best way to act as a representative.
3. The rest of the document LITERALLY said "don't say all lives matter" and don't mention "black on black crime"...you think an actually racist organization would advocate to do this? You think the GOP would do this? These are tools to help random field campaigners engage with BLM supporters and activists.
4. I have several black friends who worked at and with the DCCC. I spoke to them about this. They literally said that the DCCC wasn't out here using them to diffuse BLM, but if you have surrogates (who aren't always black) out here representing the Dems politically, you need them on message and when theres no platform on how to handle something, you can't have them making promises they can't keep. Its part of controlling messages and keeping everyone on the same page.
5. This is fukking Russia propaganda twisting the message. And you are lynching Negroes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Read the whole document:

 

[88m3]

thankfully most of the people commenting in here are already conservative fukkboys

 

[No1]

@88m3 @Blessed Is the Man @GzUp @GinaThatAintNoDamnPuppy! @Atlrocafella @wire28

1. The guy who wrote the memo IS black. Dem Memo On "Best Practices" For "Black Lives"
   
2. He was writing it as a field manual to people on the ground on how to deal with people asking for certain answers. You have to control the narrative if you have people acting as spokespeople. There isn't a BLM platform, or wasn't at the time, so to have surrogates answering questions they can't handle, isn't the best way to act as a representative.
3. The rest of the document LITERALLY said "don't say all lives matter" and don't mention "black on black crime"...you think an actually racist organization would advocate to do this? You think the GOP would do this? These are tools to help random field campaigners engage with BLM supporters and activists.
4. I have several black friends who worked at and with the DCCC. I spoke to them about this. They literally said that the DCCC wasn't out here using them to diffuse BLM, but if you have surrogates (who aren't always black) out here representing the Dems politically, you need them on message and when theres no platform on how to handle something, you can't have them making promises they can't keep. Its part of controlling messages and keeping everyone on the same page.
5. This is fukking Russia propaganda twisting the message. And you are lynching Negroes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Read the whole document:

Why the fukk did you quote me? Did you actually read what I said?

 

[ineedsleep212]

@88m3 @Blessed Is the Man @GzUp @GinaThatAintNoDamnPuppy! @Atlrocafella @wire28

1. The guy who wrote the memo IS black. Dem Memo On "Best Practices" For "Black Lives"
   
2. He was writing it as a field manual to people on the ground on how to deal with people asking for certain answers. You have to control the narrative if you have people acting as spokespeople. There isn't a BLM platform, or wasn't at the time, so to have surrogates answering questions they can't handle, isn't the best way to act as a representative.
3. The rest of the document LITERALLY said "don't say all lives matter" and don't mention "black on black crime"...you think an actually racist organization would advocate to do this? You think the GOP would do this? These are tools to help random field campaigners engage with BLM supporters and activists.
4. I have several black friends who worked at and with the DCCC. I spoke to them about this. They literally said that the DCCC wasn't out here using them to diffuse BLM, but if you have surrogates (who aren't always black) out here representing the Dems politically, you need them on message and when theres no platform on how to handle something, you can't have them making promises they can't keep. Its part of controlling messages and keeping everyone on the same page.
5. This is fukking Russia propaganda twisting the message. And you are lynching Negroes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Read the whole document:

I wasn't arguing the content just the narrative you're pushing. The problem I'd have with it is not offering support for shyt if they agree with it. It came across like thy all have to collectively get together and decide how'd they'd address it. If your constituents is who you represent and you discuss and agree with shyt, why shouldn't you be pushing it? There should be as much (as possible) communication between reps and constituents as with other members.

 

[Nomadum]

@88m3 @Blessed Is the Man @GzUp @GinaThatAintNoDamnPuppy! @Atlrocafella @wire28

1. The guy who wrote the memo IS black. Dem Memo On "Best Practices" For "Black Lives"
   
2. He was writing it as a field manual to people on the ground on how to deal with people asking for certain answers. You have to control the narrative if you have people acting as spokespeople. There isn't a BLM platform, or wasn't at the time, so to have surrogates answering questions they can't handle, isn't the best way to act as a representative.
3. The rest of the document LITERALLY said "don't say all lives matter" and don't mention "black on black crime"...you think an actually racist organization would advocate to do this? You think the GOP would do this? These are tools to help random field campaigners engage with BLM supporters and activists.
4. I have several black friends who worked at and with the DCCC. I spoke to them about this. They literally said that the DCCC wasn't out here using them to diffuse BLM, but if you have surrogates (who aren't always black) out here representing the Dems politically, you need them on message and when theres no platform on how to handle something, you can't have them making promises they can't keep. Its part of controlling messages and keeping everyone on the same page.
5. This is fukking Russia propaganda twisting the message. And you are lynching Negroes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Read the whole document:

Like I said, shyt is all a game.

fukk em all

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I wasn't arguing the content just the narrative you're pushing. The problem I'd have with it is not offering support for shyt if they agree with it. It came across like thy all have to collectively get together and decide how'd they'd address it. If your constituents is who you represent and you discuss and agree with shyt, why shouldn't you be pushing it? There should be as much (as possible) communication between reps and constituents as with other members.

have you ever worked for a campaign?

Even if people who are doing door to door messaging, who are very sympathetic to the views of people they interact with, want to promise certain things...can't.

It didn't say NOT to interact with BLM...it literally says to meet with them, just not to promise shyt you can't promise, and not to use things that inflame their situation

A BROTHER wrote this document.

He wrote this document for his tone-deaf white co-workers.

Think about that.