mcdivit85
Superstar
You're inferring things that I'm not trying to imply.
I described that a woman should determine her "goodness" for herself based on how she conducts herself and lives her life, not solely (and perhaps without any consideration of) how she treats a male partner.
Listen close - That is not the same thing as treating someone poorly, if someone male or female believes they can treat others like shyt and still be "good people"I believe this happens every day. ... I think it takes a certain level of insecurity if one requires validation or support for their perceptions of self
Point is, as a woman, how I feel about ME has nothing to do with men in any way. ...if a man wants to feel the same way about womencan't knock em.... it's how I live....what's good for the goose is good for the gander...but it still has nothing to do with treating others poorly
I didn't mean to infer poor treatment necessarily. I meant this: Can a man be "good" overall outside the context of woman? Meaning, according to your paradigm, a woman is "good" outside the context of man. So, she is good regardless of her interaction with men IF she espouses the principles you laid out.
For some reason, I don't think females would agree that a man can be "good" if he has all the principles you espouse and yet cheats on his woman. Basically, a man's "goodness" will eventually be tied to his treatment of woman at some point in the deductive process.
I just find that to be funny.
Peace