Here you go. First take a look at the poll
http://www.thecoli.com/threads/what-if-russell-wilson-wins-the-super-bowl.286246/
being elite doesn't means all time great, breh.

Here you go. First take a look at the poll
http://www.thecoli.com/threads/what-if-russell-wilson-wins-the-super-bowl.286246/

Don't play stupid. Take a look around these Wilson threads and you will see people in here saying he's a top 5 QB, up there with Rodgers, up there with Brady (who was supposedly
by most people's accounts back in October).
Russ has a ways to go before reaching that company.
How many QBs are better than Russell right now?
A couple of people doesn't make the Coli reasoning, Stop it.

I'm not sure I even understand this sentence but it was more than a couple people.![]()

Well I thought Russ played to win, like your boy Luck.U do realize not every qb is allowed to audible right? And none of em are gonna change a pass play to a run play vs goaline![]()
The majority of the Coli doesn't think his a top 5, breh. Only a few stated this and you claim its a lot of people.![]()

For whatever the reason you would rather play dumb and pretend that in those threads it is only a couple people. Who are the rest? Aliases? No matter. If they want to make Russ the highest paid QB in the NFL, great for him. Great for the rest of the league, too. That will mean less room to keep the rest of the team together.![]()
Your narrative is lame.
Why would I waste my time constructing this supposed narrative? Think about what you are saying. All I did was read the threads and comment on them in here. You are reaching.Everyone was talking about his 10-0 record v. Super Bowl MVP QBs before the Super Bowl this year (10-1 now carlton, take this L you charmin soft God-fearing beta)
First, remove eli manning from this list since he only shows up for the playoffs, so now we're left with 8 wins.
2012:
v. Green Bay (technically a loss but whatever)
v. New England
2013:
v. New Orleans (x2)
v. Denver (super bowl)
2014:
v. Denver
v. Green Bay (x2)
Now look at where he beat all these QBs...AT HOME
Common thread: Save the super bowl (which was on a neutral site against the biggest playoff choker in the history of sports), he has never beaten any of them away from the '12th man'.2-0 v. brees, 3-0 v. rodgers, 1-0 v. peyton, 1-0 v. brady, ALL AT HOME
So this is really the WOAT stat that Russell stans use because it doesn't tell us anything useful, as ANY QB (just about) could beat any of those QBs while playing in seattle. MATT HASSELBECK BEAT THE SAINTS IN SEATTLE.
Cliffs: Russell wilson is overhyped to ridiculous levels because of meaningless stats that are shaped almost entirely by the fact that they were all home games in the best artificial homefield advantage in football.

Why would I waste my time constructing this supposed narrative? All I did was read the threads and comment on them in here. You are reaching.
You claimed they were posters stated he was up there with the all time greats.
Okay, so now you are twisting my words around. I said "up there with the greats" which is what people were arguing in those threads. Current players of elite status. You are trying to tell me that I used the words "all time" which I did not. You should read before you post.
greats means all time greats. Like Montana. Why not use the word "elite" like the thread link you posted. Use your words better.
You're spending an awful lot of time on this "narrative" that I supposedly created out of thin air (What motive I would have to do that I am still unclear) and have yet to comment on anything that has been posted in here regarding where Russ is as a QB in this current NFL landscape.