? Those people were anti genocide protestersProgressives were just protesting outside Kamala’s book tour.
? Those people were anti genocide protestersProgressives were just protesting outside Kamala’s book tour.
This is a missed assessment on the Newsome thing. It’s not an appeal more to republicans it’s about not being handcuffed by the far left purity test. You seek Hakeem having problems with trying not to fail these test every weekI don't think they're pushing her because they think she can be president. They're pushing her because they'd like to change the primary narrative from Newsom's "we need to appeal more to Republicans" framing.
I disagree with this. The only one that handcuff himself on this stuff is him. If he wants to cozy up to billionaires, AIPAC, and right wing racists that's totally his right. Just like it's voters rights to take issue with it.his is a missed assessment on the Newsome thing. It’s not an appeal more to republicans it’s about not being handcuffed by the far left purity test.
Jeffries issue is he wants all the benefits of being an AIPAC stooge but none of the smoke that comes along with it. If he plans on continuing to receive AIPAC money and thinks there's nothing wrong with it, he should say so. Instead he hems and haws and tries to obfuscate what he actually beleives. No one is going to believe in a politician like that.You seek Hakeem having problems with trying not to fail these test every week
We’re agreeing here. Jeffries gotta be able to move with convictionI disagree with this. The only one that handcuff himself on this stuff is him. If he wants to cozy up to billionaires, AIPAC, and right wing racists that's totally his right. Just like it's voters rights to take issue with it.
Jeffries issue is he wants all the benefits of being an AIPAC stooge but none of the smoke that comes along with it. If he plans on continuing to receive AIPAC money and thinks there's nothing wrong with it, he should say so. Instead he hems and haws and tries to obfuscate what he actually beleives. No one is going to believe in a politician like that.
Maybe, but what you're describing as purity tests I'd characterize as a lack of conviction from Newsom, Jeffries, etc.We’re agreeing here. Jeffries gotta be able to move with conviction
And when she loses/drops out the DNC can be blamed by a vocal cohort and we can spend the waning months of the 28 general campaign blaming whoever the nominee is and let Vance solidify MAGA reign for the foreseeable futureI don't think they're pushing her because they think she can be president. They're pushing her because they'd like to change the primary narrative from Newsom's "we need to appeal more to Republicans" framing.

I don't think she should run. But if she does all the Dnc is let the process play out, she shouldn't win. But if she does start to look like she's doing well and they out their thumb on the scale for Newsom or Pete... I think it could get ugly.And when she loses/drops out the DNC can be blamed by a vocal cohort and we can spend the waning months of the 28 general campaign blaming whoever the nominee is and let Vance solidify MAGA reign for the foreseeable future![]()
Reporter : there's a lot of concern about the democrat party taking money from AIPAC and it's similar offshoots.... can you you make a pledge today you will not be taking...I disagree with this. The only one that handcuff himself on this stuff is him. If he wants to cozy up to billionaires, AIPAC, and right wing racists that's totally his right. Just like it's voters rights to take issue with it.
Jeffries issue is he wants all the benefits of being an AIPAC stooge but none of the smoke that comes along with it. If he plans on continuing to receive AIPAC money and thinks there's nothing wrong with it, he should say so. Instead he hems and haws and tries to obfuscate what he actually beleives. No one is going to believe in a politician like that.

Newsome has convictionMaybe, but what you're describing as purity tests I'd characterize as a lack of conviction from Newsom, Jeffries, etc.
The far left lunatics have tried to cancel him
ok man good luck.Mills is anti-labor/pro-business. Handpicked by Schumer establishment candidate. Is she worse than Collins? I don't know.Why is this?