Democratic Party Rebuild

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
54,047
Reputation
3,138
Daps
152,010
Why do you do this about issues not being discussed? He stopped saying “latinx” and defending unquestioned trans inclusion in voluntary sports.

Newsom said nothing about the civil rights act. Cali got ride of affirmative action over 20 years ago.
False equivalence, the equivalent to this would be a transgender person telling Newsome to stop calling them a tranny or a black person not wanting to be called a negro.
 

Pull Up the Roots

Breakfast for dinner.
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
25,737
Reputation
13,060
Daps
111,235
Reppin
Detroit
Yes you do. You’re running for office to serve the people. You can’t go against the will of the people because you think you’re right
Yikes. That kind of thinking is dangerous because history shows that "the will of the people" isn't always just. If leaders always bent to majority pressure, then segregation would have lasted longer, marriage equality wouldn't exist, and many civil rights wouldn't have been protected. A politician's job isn't just to follow the loudest voices, but to uphold justice and protect marginalized people, even when it's unpopular. Otherwise, we're just giving bigotry the power to dictate policy.
 

the cac mamba

Banned
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
111,880
Reputation
14,245
Daps
317,018
Reppin
NULL
Newsom is slick but he's not Bill Clinton. Newsom is going to be portrayed as a better looking craftier John Kerry. He's going to be destroyed as a flip flopper and won't make it out of the primary and if he does he'll get beat up just like Kamala did. The only thing that will lift him is the don't pay attention to shyt vote because they're tired of the other party.
newsom was '24 or bust, he would have been perfect to sub in

i wouldn't vote newsom in the '28 primary in a million years
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,890
Reputation
-34,994
Daps
641,371
Reppin
The Deep State
Newsom is slick but he's not Bill Clinton. Newsom is going to be portrayed as a better looking craftier John Kerry. He's going to be destroyed as a flip flopper and won't make it out of the primary and if he does he'll get beat up just like Kamala did. The only thing that will lift him is the don't pay attention to shyt vote because they're tired of the other party.
Clinton came from a Dixiecrat conservative state...
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,890
Reputation
-34,994
Daps
641,371
Reppin
The Deep State
False equivalence, the equivalent to this would be a transgender person telling Newsome to stop calling them a tranny or a black person not wanting to be called a negro.
No. it’s not the same. Latinx isn’t even apart of the language. It’s not a slur, it’s a perversion of a language.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,890
Reputation
-34,994
Daps
641,371
Reppin
The Deep State
Yikes. That kind of thinking is dangerous because history shows that "the will of the people" isn't always just. If leaders always bent to majority pressure, then segregation would have lasted longer, marriage equality wouldn't exist, and many civil rights wouldn't have been protected. A politician's job isn't just to follow the loudest voices, but to uphold justice and protect marginalized people, even when it's unpopular. Otherwise, we're just giving bigotry the power to dictate policy.
OK, so should Gavin Newsom continue to use the word “Latinx?”
 

the cac mamba

Banned
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
111,880
Reputation
14,245
Daps
317,018
Reppin
NULL
OK, so should Gavin Newsom continue to use the word “Latinx?”
i have him on ignore, but of course a condescending gay white liberal like @Pull Out The dikk is demanding that latinos be fine with being called "latinx" :mjlol:

we need to stop being the party of Human Resources. it's embarrassing. "latinx" sums up this party's culture war failures like nothing else
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
54,047
Reputation
3,138
Daps
152,010
No. it’s not the same. Latinx isn’t even apart of the language. It’s not a slur, it’s a perversion of a language.
Latinx was some made up gender neutral word that cacs made up to discuss latin individuals. Never said "latinx" was part of the language, Latin American didn't want to be called that shyt.
 
Top