KFBF
Superstar
Thanks Obama.
You more concerned with helping republicans win thats why you like wasting resources on south CarolinaA lot of “brehs” in this thread have a problem with black folks having the first say, interesting![]()
I know Mr. “I have to tip my cap to Trump” isn’t talkingYou more concerned with helping republicans win thats why you like wasting resources on south Carolina![]()
I say it because it's the most (potentially only) actually democratic method. The scheduled primary system ends up disenfranchising the vast majority of party voters by making the worth of an early state voter magnitudes more powerful than that of a later state voter. The race is almost always over after Super Tuesday so any resident of the majority of states that have primaries after Super Tuesday often can't even vote for their preferred candidate. It's a ridiculous vestige of the political boss/machine era of politics, which is why we have all these candidates making the pilgrimage down to a fukkin South Carolina fish fry to kiss James Clyburn's nuts. Just think of why it would be a massive fukking problem if the Presidential election took place on state-by-state delayed schedule. Same rationale applies to the primary.Why do you say that? It would rig the primaries towards whoever has the highest name recognition
You'd listen to me trump wouldnt be electedI know Mr. “I have to tip my cap to Trump” isn’t talking![]()
Your ideology is running from SC Blacks, I’m not so sure about thatYou'd listen to me trump wouldnt be elected![]()
A same day primary would give every Democratic Party voter the same power (delegate counts notwithstanding). Which is...you know...the point of democracy. Black folks would still end up with a disproportionate amount of power in the Democratic Primary with a same day primary, but this time it would be earned due to having more numerical representation within the party as opposed to some undemocratic backroom horse-trading by party elites. No one group should have the "first say" in a democracy. One person, one vote.A lot of “brehs” in this thread have a problem with black folks having the first say, interesting![]()
when last time dems won sc for sc to be deciding elections ?Your ideology is running from SC Blacks, I’m not so sure about that![]()
I disagree, a granular primary is the best for long shot candidates with little name recognition.A same day primary would give every Democratic Party voter the same power (delegate counts notwithstanding). Which is...you know...the point of democracy. Black folks would still end up with a disproportionate amount of power in the Democratic Primary with a same day primary, but this time it would be earned due to having more numerical representation within the party as opposed to some undemocratic backroom horse-trading by party elites. No one group should have the "first say" in a democracy. One person, one vote.
I agree that an undemocratic system that prioritizes backroom horse-trading and gives an unrepresentative segment of the population massively overvalued voting power can provide a long-shot candidate with little name recognition a better chance of winning the primary because they can more easily game that system. But I don't think the point of elections/primaries is to give long shot candidates with little name recognition the best chance. I think the point of elections/primaries is to democratically reflect the will of the entire voting base. A same day primary does that much better than this state-by-state scheduled primary. It simply does not make sense that all the Democratic voters in Michigan, Arizona, Florida, Illinois, Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Georgia, New York, and many other states combined all collectively had less effect on the primary than voters in Iowa and South Carolina alone. That's fundamentally undemocratic. It's similar to the structurally undemocratic problems with the electoral college. That should be abolished as well.I disagree, a granular primary is the best for long shot candidates with little name recognition.
Debates aren’t enough because not every voter watches them and establishment media would favorably give good press to establishment candidates. Harder to build a grass roots movement without momentum
These the people @Outlaw @the cac mamba and gang want to do bipartisanship bills with. But they should vote on a white women dying bill
republicans should be looked at as the manics they're
Stop it i only shyt on democrat leaders around folks that I know cant be easily influenced by " both sides" tm. You aren't partisan, you’re just a democrat apologist thats the difference between me and you.You shyt on democrats so much that Republicans would pay you to post if the coli was a bigger & more influential site.
I’m way more partisan than you breh, try a different angle next time