nikka what?You’re a right wing troll. I’m done with you

nikka what?You’re a right wing troll. I’m done with you

Leader of our party![]()
I think you're right. He really seems like a rightwing troll. I still don't know why he hasn't been bushed. He is very disruptive on this site. He clogs up all threads with his arguing. He is worse than @the cac mamba. @the cac mamba is obsessed with trans shyt, but he's nowhere as bad as @Loose. I might need to block @Loose. He ruins every thread. It's very annoying
You’re a right wing troll. I’m done with you
Dems and @Outlaw his kind clapped like seals when she exposed libsoftiktok
Tucker Carlson
Russian assets like Benny Johnson tim pool etc
But let her write investigative journalism on dark money group on the left it’s a bad thing.
Don’t let him drag you into another all day debate about a girl who gets money from the same people complaining about a left leaning social media infrastructure being developedYes it’s a bad thing because useful idiots for the right like you don’t understand nuance. If you don’t like dark money then push for legislation that bans it so the right can’t use it either.
If you’re going to make it so only the right can receive dark money then the left remains underfunded and underrepresented

So let me get this straight: as a Blue MAGA five-star general, you want investigative journalists to report only on right-wing dark money and billionaires—while ignoring the left-wing equivalent? That flies in the face of journalistic integrity. Essentially, you're asking for a left-wing version of MAGA, where reporters need ideological approval before covering a topic? If so got itYes it’s a bad thing because useful idiots for the right like you don’t understand nuance. If you don’t like dark money then push for legislation that bans it so the right can’t use it either.
If you’re going to make it so only the right can receive dark money then the left remains underfunded and underrepresented
Yes. fukk journalistic integrity when the fascists are trying to destroy a free press altogether. Every journalist has a choice on what stories to cover. You have to read the room and recognize what dangers we face as a societySo let me get this straight: as a Blue MAGA five-star general, you want investigative journalists to report only on right-wing dark money and billionaires—while ignoring the left-wing equivalent? That flies in the face of journalistic integrity. Essentially, you're asking for a left-wing version of MAGA, where reporters need ideological approval before covering a topic? If so got it
Got it you want left wing fascismYes. fukk journalistic integrity
Nope, moral purity only benefits the right wing because they have no moralsGot it you want left wing fascism
Disagree the lack of moral purity and ethics is why we have fascism in the first place. If you want journalist to not be journalist we will continue going further rightNope, moral purity only benefits the right wing because they have no morals
Nope, the over policing of the moral purity of the democrats is partially why Trump won.Disagree the lack of moral purity and ethics is why we have fascism in the first place. If you want journalist to not be journalist we will continue going further right