Democratic Party Rebuild

[the cac mamba]

Why are you trying to force a black woman out?

i want a corrupt 86 year old out. pelosi right along with her

and how many young, competent black women in her district could/should step in to take her place there must be hundreds

 

[KFBF]

i want a corrupt 86 year old out. pelosi right along with her

and how many young, competent black women in her district could/should step in to take her place there must be hundreds

Why don't you respect the role elders play in the black community?

 

[the cac mamba]

Why don't you respect the role elders play in the black community?

what does that have to do with getting caught stealing campaign cash

she's 86 years old. she's held the seat for almost 40 years. i'm in the wrong for saying it's time for someone else to take that seat? gimme a break

pelosi's even worse, and everyone says the same thing about pelosi

 

[acri1]

This is cope. Democrats have been associated with black and brown people since LBJ

I'm talking in the context of the current social environment where things like "diversity" and DEI are curse words.

Not to say priorities might not change for voters one day. I'm just saying that most of conservative politics today is just people voting against minority groups they dislike, and as long as it stays like that Dems are going to be at a disadvantage.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

The slogan "abolish Palantir" is a bad and overly simplified critique when framed as something the Dems could unilaterally do but refuses to. Private corporations can't just be legislated out of existence overnight. Reducing complex public-private entanglements to a catchphrase misrepresents how power works and risks leaving people disillusioned when, inevitably, no party -- even a willing one -- can deliver on something that was never realistically in their power to begin with.

A better critique would focus on what power actually allows, like ending federal contracts with firms like Palantir and SpaceX, enforcing stricter procurement policies, challenging surveillance and policing budgets, and confronting the military-industrial complex that enables these companies to thrive in the first place.

These are systemic issues fostered and exploited by these vultures. These battles should be fought through a real political program that makes bold, meaningful demands of Democrats, not with empty sloganeering like "abolish Palantir" for internet clout. We need to force them to use their administrative and legislative authority to starve the beast of federal support by reshaping the ecosystem that feeds it.

I hate to say this, but Nap was somewhat right. Simple slogans can get in the way. They may start out as rallying cries, but too often they become vulnerabilities, either because they're so vague they need constant clarification, or because they're so absolute they become easy to weaponize by opponents or to disappoint supporters. That's not me saying we should give up, just that we should move beyond slogans to plainly state our demands.

People really gotta move beyond being “against militarism”

You can have better foreign policy, but Democrats can’t win elections by telling voters we are mothballing our weapons

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

now, if Democrats want to defend this in the midterms and 2028, then say so.



@the cac mamba

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

 

[Loose]

People really gotta move beyond being “against militarism”

You can have better foreign policy, but Democrats can’t win elections by telling voters we are mothballing our weapons

What does foreign policy have to do with Palantir creating a database to surveillance united states citizens? You just be blabbing without knowing what in the fukk you're talking about. This is domestic policy, nothing to do with foreign policy. & yes the party that runs on the deep state, surveillance state , and all types of 1984 Orville like scare tactics to amplify their base should have the gun pointed back to them @Pull Up the Roots

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

What does foreign policy have to do with Palantir creating a database to surveillance united states citizens? You just be blabbing without knowing what in the fukk youre talking about. That's domestic policy.

I’m not even trolling but IDK what PALANTIR is doing that doesn’t already exist in totality.

 

[KFBF]

30,000 people show up to a rally headlined by a Democrat.

Call Center: We need to purge these people.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

30,000 people show up to a rally headlined by a Democrat.

Call Center: We need to purge these people.

Trump had weaker crowds all 2024

 

[Loose]

I’m not even trolling but IDK what PALANTIR is doing that doesn’t already exist in totality.

If you don't know what you're talking about you should stick to the sidelines, because there is currently not a surveillance compilation master list of personal information on Americans. This is unchecked surveillance power that currently does not exist.

 

[Loose]

30,000 people show up to a rally headlined by a Democrat.

Call Center: We need to purge these people.

And they wonder why we 0/2 outside of the bubble election

 

[the cac mamba]

And they wonder why we 0/2 outside of the bubble election

i'm just glad that master strategists like you know who to nominate in 2028

wait...who is that, again?