Democratic Party Rebuild

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
54,106
Reputation
3,190
Daps
152,144
Lol that david pakman tweet on Gaza hospital , ah it makes sense why chorus onky reached out to certain types :lolbron:
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
48,170
Reputation
7,321
Daps
152,830
Reppin
CookoutGang
People want a more efficient government. People hate seeing projects run long, never complete, or not deliver what was promised when they voted for it.

That’s the core argument pushed by abundance dems. Seeing defund people do the same thing they accused others is hilarious to me.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
54,106
Reputation
3,190
Daps
152,144
People want a more efficient government. People hate seeing projects run long, never complete, or not deliver what was promised when they voted for it.

That’s the core argument pushed by abundance dems. Seeing defund people do the same thing they accused others is hilarious to me.
False abundance dems are pushing for less regulation to benefit the private sector not a more efficient government projects. While abundance Democrats talk about. building more housing, they rarely advocate for public housing—the kind that actually helps low-income communities ans starter homes which was a major factor pre reagan. . Instead, they lean heavily on deregulation and zoning tweaks, hoping the private market will magically solve the crisis. That’s wishful thinking at best which is why they're criticized for their neo liberal approach. It's a b*stardized half ass approach on expanding housing where public housing barely gets a mention, despite its proven track record in fighting homelessness and displacement. And while permitting reform sounds good on paper, it often ends up serving developers more than the people who need housing most. The real issue? They avoid policies that redistribute power or wealth—like federal investment in social housing—because that would mean confronting corporate interests and donors. As David Greenwald puts it, this version of “progress” risks handing the reins to the very forces that created the problem in the first place.
 
Last edited:

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
9,376
Reputation
504
Daps
27,146
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
Lol that david pakman tweet on Gaza hospital , ah it makes sense why chorus onky reached out to certain types :lolbron:
Which is worse? Pakman’s tweet or your Idol Hassan leading his sheep to a slaughter by feigning ignorance towards who would be worse for Palestine between Kamala and Trump?
 

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
9,376
Reputation
504
Daps
27,146
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
False abundance dems are pushing for less regulation to benefit the private sector not a more efficient government projects. While abundance Democrats talk about. building more housing, they rarely advocate for public housing—the kind that actually helps low-income communities ans starter homes which was a major factor pre reagan. . Instead, they lean heavily on deregulation and zoning tweaks, hoping the private market will magically solve the crisis. That’s wishful thinking at best which is why they're criticized for their neo liberal approach. It's a b*stardized half ass approach on expanding housing where public housing barely gets a mention, despite its proven track record in fighting homelessness and displacement. And while permitting reform sounds good on paper, it often ends up serving developers more than the people who need housing most. The real issue? They avoid policies that redistribute power or wealth—like federal investment in social housing—because that would mean confronting corporate interests and donors. As David Greenwald puts it, this version of “progress” risks handing the reins to the very forces that created the problem in the first place.
So instead of trying a new approach we should do nothing and whine, which is the twitter leftists specialty?
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
54,106
Reputation
3,190
Daps
152,144
So instead of trying a new approach we should do nothing and whine, which is the twitter leftists specialty?
You read what I wrote which discussed a different approach and this the stupid shyt you replied with? Just brain dead shytlib posting
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,890
Reputation
-34,999
Daps
641,375
Reppin
The Deep State
False abundance dems are pushing for less regulation to benefit the private sector not a more efficient government projects. While abundance Democrats talk about. building more housing, they rarely advocate for public housing—the kind that actually helps low-income communities ans starter homes which was a major factor pre reagan. . Instead, they lean heavily on deregulation and zoning tweaks, hoping the private market will magically solve the crisis. That’s wishful thinking at best which is why they're criticized for their neo liberal approach. It's a b*stardized half ass approach on expanding housing where public housing barely gets a mention, despite its proven track record in fighting homelessness and displacement. And while permitting reform sounds good on paper, it often ends up serving developers more than the people who need housing most. The real issue? They avoid policies that redistribute power or wealth—like federal investment in social housing—because that would mean confronting corporate interests and donors. As David Greenwald puts it, this version of “progress” risks handing the reins to the very forces that created the problem in the first place.
homelessness is not a priority. Housing affordability for the middle class is.
 
Top