Democratic Party Rebuild

[Outlaw]

If he's actually black he's a who probably listens to Dax and Tom Macdonald

Actually I’m less of a c00n because I’m not a victim of groupthink. You can’t even explain your position without resulting to emotional ad-hominem attacks.

The same cacs on twitter who told you to be outraged by the commercial are the same cacs who told you to give a blackwater mercenary with a Nazi tattoo a pass. Use your own mind black man stop letting these grifters on twitter think for you.

 

[Loose]

It’s an interpretation. I’m asking a good faith question, how can the commercial be perceived as a dog whistle for Nazism other than it being a white woman saying she’s attractive because she has good genes?

That is a scientific fact. If you find someone attractive then you’re subconsciously admitting they have good genes.


No where in the commercial did it say only white people have good genes.

Some ugly bytch/grifter on twitter probably lit the outrage ember on twitter and it wildfire.

Idk if you a troll or a c00n possibly both? imagine being confused how a white women talking about she has good genes in 2025 isn't a white supremacist dog whistle. Even the white supremacist that support her know its a dog whistle lol

 

[Outlaw]

Idk if you a troll or a c00n possibly both? imagine being confused how a white women talking about she has good genes in 2025 isn't a white supremacist dog whistle. Even the white supremacist that support her know its a dog whistle lol

This type of faux outrage is why men don’t fukk with the Democratic Party. Who gives a fukk if a white woman says she has good genes. ALL RACES OF WOMEN HAVE GOOD GENES

 

[Loose]

This type of faux outrage is why men don’t fukk with the Democratic Party. Who gives a fukk if a white woman says she has good genes. ALL RACES OF WOMEN HAVE GOOD GENES

What does the democratic party have to do with this conversation, I dont care about white supremacist not liking black people you c00ns kill me


All races matter

 

[Outlaw]

What does the democratic party have to do with this conversation, I dont care about white supremacist not liking black people you c00ns kill me


All races matter

This type of idiocy is the perfect personification of why normies and Men went away from the Dems in 2024 despite running against Trump.

Imagine believing that an attractive woman should feel shame for saying she’s attractive.

fukk outta here

 

[AquaCityBoy]

Idk if you a troll or a c00n possibly both? imagine being confused how a white women talking about she has good genes in 2025 isn't a white supremacist dog whistle. Even the white supremacist that support her know its a dog whistle lol

What does the democratic party have to do with this conversation, I dont care about white supremacist not liking black people you c00ns kill me


All races matter

What's especially hilarious is that the Katseye GAP ad that was made in response to the Sydney Sweeney ad was literally pointing out what he's describing:



Crazy how GAP could figure out what that ad was implying but 'black' Coli poster @Outlaw just can't figure it out four months later

 

[Loose]

What's especially hilarious is that the Katseye GAP ad that was made in response to the Sydney Sweeney ad was literally pointing out what he's describing:



Crazy how GAP could figure out what that ad was implying but 'black' Coli poster @Outlaw just can't figure it out four months later

Well our "black" coli poster lusting over titties, he's blinded by c00ning

 

[Outlaw]

What's especially hilarious is that the Katseye GAP ad that was made in response to the Sydney Sweeney ad was literally pointing out what he's describing:



Crazy how GAP could figure out what that ad was implying but 'black' Coli poster @Outlaw just can't figure it out four months later

You can’t explain it either so I guess we’re in the same boat. We both just can’t figure out why there’s outrage

Both American eagle and GAP are manipulating idiots like you, just opposite sides of the same outrage coin

 

[AquaCityBoy]

You can’t explain it either so I guess we’re in the same boat. We both just can’t figure out why there’s outrage

Multiple people have explained this to you multiple times for months

Like I said, @the cac mamba has to play dumb because otherwise he'd be defending a white supremacist dog whistle on a majority black forum. But you're (allegedly) black, so what's your excuse?

 

[Outlaw]

Multiple people have explained this to you multiple times for months

Like I said, @the cac mamba has to play dumb because otherwise he'd be defending a white supremacist dog whistle on a majority black forum. But you're (allegedly) black, so what's your excuse?

Not one person has explained it other than saying white women aren’t allowed to say they’re attractive because Nazis?

 

[AquaCityBoy]

Not one person has explained it other than saying white women aren’t allowed to say they’re attractive because Nazis?

You were the one who said, "b-b-but all women have good genes!" The GAP ad featuring Katseye was expressly meant to portray in response to the Sydney Sweeney ad. What is your response to that?

 

[Outlaw]

You were the one who said, "b-b-but all women have good genes!" The GAP ad featuring Katseye was expressly meant to portray in response to the Sydney Sweeney ad. What is your response to that?

I’m not well versed in interpretive dance so I’m not sure what’s being communicated in the ad other than a diverse group of women dancing. I don’t see how that contradicts the American eagle ad other than you projecting your insecurities

 

[AquaCityBoy]

I’m not well versed in interpretive dance so I’m not sure what’s being communicated in the ad other than a diverse group of women dancing. I don’t see how that contradicts the American eagle ad other than you projecting your insecurities

https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/25/entertainment/katseye-gap-adIn

America’s denim divide, Katseye delivered a moment that’s as comfy as an old pair of jeans
Katseye and the Gap are giving us something old, something new, something borrowed and something blue.


In a new ad campaign, titled “Better in Denim,” Gap trades on a tried-and-true formula for the clothing company: a hit song, an infectious dance and blue jeans.


The spot feels tailor-made for the TikTok generation, featuring the global girl group Katseye, performing choreography by Robbie Blue to the 2003 Kelis song, “Milkshake.”


“This is denim as you define it. Your individuality. Your self-expression,” a description for the ad reads. “Your style. Powerful on your own. Even better together.”







The diversity, dancing and fashion has helped the ad go viral at a time when there’s been debate about how companies are relating to their customer base. Such was the case a few weeks ago, when American Eagle released a campaign with actress Sydney Sweeney in which puns about jeans and genes struck some as a reference to eugenics and sparked social grappling about cancel culture and what it means to be American.





What has America learned from the Sydney Sweeney situation? We asked the experts


Gap appears to have avoided controversy by sticking with an approach they have been using in similar ads for almost 30 years, many that have featured actors and artists - like Katseye - who are having a cultural moment.

Katseye’s Gap ad hit 400M views in 3 days. What happened next?

Global girl group Katseye has quickly risen to fame. The multinational group debuted last year and consists of members from diverse backgrounds.

apnews.com

AP: Your Gap ad went super viral — it’s all over my TikTok “For You” page. It feels more like a music video than an advertisement.​

MANON: That’s what I loved so much about the Gap campaigns. ... Even way back in the days, they used to have those dancing commercials. And I was so excited when our team told us we would do it, because I was like, “Oh this is about to hit.”

SOPHIA: The Gap campaign truly is something that us, as Katseye, truly align with. It’s all about the confidence and inclusivity and expression. And to see its impact, and to see our pure intentions as a group and what we stand for and what we want to give out to the world, like really happen, it’s really beautiful to see.

Yeah, you're either trolling or c00ning

Are you a Brandon Tatum fan by chance

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

It’s an interpretation. I’m asking a good faith question, how can the commercial be perceived as a dog whistle for Nazism other than it being a white woman saying she’s attractive because she has good genes?

That is a scientific fact. If you find someone attractive then you’re subconsciously admitting they have good genes.


No where in the commercial did it say only white people have good genes.

Some ugly bytch/grifter on twitter probably lit the outrage ember on twitter and it wildfire.

The ad centered an idealized version of "white beauty" then ended talking about good genes. That doesn't land as a neutral statement about attractiveness, but an echo of old racial hierarchies about how beauty and worth are tied to whiteness.

Nobody's saying the ad literally declares "only white people have good genes." The issue is the subtext and how it plays in a moment where we're seeing a wider push to re-normalize that kind of racial signaling under the banner of being "anti-woke." That's why the ad immediately got championed by that crowd. They understood what it meant, and they loved it, because it said something that resonated with them.

You can't strip an ad of its context and act like it exists in a vacuum. Corporations know exactly how these dog whistles work, and they rely on the plausible deniability of ambiguity to reach one audience while dismissing criticism from another. They don't have to say the quiet part out loud to communicate it. That's what makes it effective marketing and politically revealing at the same time.

Edit.

 

[John Reena]

I'm not supporting anyone. Stop generalizing, stop deflecting, and answer why you used that racist myth to defend Trump. Don't try to move the goalposts now.

This is what you said:

This isn't about concern for crime, it's a deflection. If that concern were real, you'd be talking about gun policy, poverty, and disinvestment, not using violence in Black communities as a rhetorical shield for Trump.

Ya progressives defend Trump all the time and criticize democrats.

Nice try though.