Exact opposite both should have been gone once they lost the election in resounding defeats.Nothing says party in shambles like trying to toss leadership in both chambers.
Exact opposite both should have been gone once they lost the election in resounding defeats.Nothing says party in shambles like trying to toss leadership in both chambers.
The electorate doesn't vote specifically for party leadership - so how exactly is it their fault that voters didn't give them the majority seats?Exact opposite both should have been gone once they lost the election in resounding defeats.
Is the beef that everlasting that Zohran wouldn’t back his boy when it came down to it?? Or was his conversation with Hakeem really that productive??Chi will probably end up backing off due to not having the backing of Mamdani (or any establishment democrat) along with Jeffries position as leader in the house, but Jeffries should be subject to primary as soon as it’s deemed politically viable.
Cowardly, Zionist shilling politician who only dared to show a backbone after he was humiliated by an AI video of him wearing a sombrero![]()
Wild.Your algorithm is full of confirmation bias.
Zohran is a smart, shrewd politician. I’m sure he doesn’t care for Jeffries, but winners don’t back losers, which Chi would decidedly be going against the machine.Is the beef that everlasting that Zohran wouldn’t back his boy when it came down to it?? Or was his conversation with Hakeem really that productive??

Has Hakeem Jeffries said anything as complimentary about Zohran Mamdani?Your algorithm is full of confirmation bias.
You all spend way too much time focused on the wrong things...andThis is the type of leadership these guys want. A black man complimenting a provably racist white woman whose allegiance lies with the Republican Party who didn’t have the nerve to back the democratic primary winner in New York City.
@ that being a compliment.He came in and backed him last minute in late October. Now help me understand why that's so incredibly relevant to anything other than justifying your grievance with the party?Has Hakeem Jeffries said anything as complimentary about Zohran Mamdani?
Outside of that last minute endorsement, there isn't much, but I am sure your algorithm has something showing otherwise.
He gave a lukewarm, last‑minute endorsement to save face for an actual Democrat, while openly praising a racist white supremacist for her “fight against Trump.” How is that confusing?He came in and backed him last minute in late October. Now help me understand why that's so incredibly relevant to anything other than justifying your grievance with the party?
Please tag me when Jeffries undermines Mamdani's leadership or initiatives.
You all know exactly why he didn't openly back Mamdani because of getting exposed from accepting contributions from AIPAC. I'd much rather see you all sh*t on him for that than "he won't say nice things about his new mayor...".
Again, you all are routinely disgruntled and appear to be more comfortable there.
He came in and backed him last minute in late October. Now help me understand why that's so incredibly relevant to anything other than justifying your grievance with the party?
Please tag me when Jeffries undermines Mamdani's leadership or initiatives.
You all know exactly why he didn't openly back Mamdani because of getting exposed from accepting contributions from AIPAC. I'd much rather see you all sh*t on him for that than "he won't say nice things about his new mayor...".
Again, you all are routinely disgruntled and appear to be more comfortable there.
It's confusing because what does this do or don't do for the party? All this does is give you something else to complain about.He gave a lukewarm, last‑minute endorsement to save face for an actual Democrat, while openly praising a racist white supremacist for her “fight against Trump.” How is that confusing?