Democratic Party Rebuild

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
111,881
Reputation
14,185
Daps
317,060
Reppin
NULL
Ken Martin protecting the dem establishment by hiding information which he claimed he wouldn't like they did in 2016 when he took the job is democrats in a nutshell
i'm genuinely confused what you think is in there that A. you don't know, and B. could happen again in 2028

i think the power structure that let Biden run again should be tarred and feathered; but i know that's what happened. i don't need a report to tell me :dead:

frankly i'm also disgusted that Newsom didn't stage a coup. he had the juice to do it, and actually challenge Biden/force him out. and all we got was a no name like Dean Phillips to speak out :snoop:
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
54,791
Reputation
3,247
Daps
153,950
It's embarrassing that mitt Romney think we should tax the rich over so called centrist democrats:dead:
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
54,791
Reputation
3,247
Daps
153,950

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
111,881
Reputation
14,185
Daps
317,060
Reppin
NULL

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
111,881
Reputation
14,185
Daps
317,060
Reppin
NULL
Asked for proof


Provided proof and this his responae. Unserious poster lol
Romney is talking about a federal tax that no american could flee, and you gave an example of a state level tax that billionaires could flee and still stay an american. that's not the same conversation, you idiot

does Romney live in a dark blue state? no, he fled to Utah :mjlol:
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
54,791
Reputation
3,247
Daps
153,950
Romney is talking about a federal tax that no american could flee, and you gave an example of a state level tax that billionaires could flee and still stay an american. that's not the same conversation, you idiot

does Romney live in a dark blue state? no, he fled to Utah :mjlol:
This is just cope of being wrong per usual :mjlol:. Yea Gavin newsome would have a different ideology if he was the senator or president from California instead of the governor. Continued idiocy from you as always, embarrassing :dead:
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
111,881
Reputation
14,185
Daps
317,060
Reppin
NULL
This is just cope of being wrong per usual :mjlol:. Yea Gavin newsome would have a different ideology if he was the senator or president from California instead of the governor. Continued idiocy from you as always, embarrassing :dead:
state level taxes and a federal tax are not the same thing, you fukking moron :what:

this proposal being put forth in CA doesn't exist in 49 other states :what:Newsom has to deal with retaining Californians as his state's executive

maybe if progressives actually held any important seats, you could grasp what he's trying to deal with. but you don't :mjlol:
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
54,791
Reputation
3,247
Daps
153,950
state level taxes and a federal tax are not the same thing, you fukking moron :what:

this proposal being put forth in CA doesn't exist in 49 other states :what:Newsom has to deal with retaining Californians as his state's executive
It's an ideology idiot. He's not going to be against a billionaire tax as governor and magically be for it as president:what:. He flat out said what he stands for to sorkin
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
111,881
Reputation
14,185
Daps
317,060
Reppin
NULL
It's an ideology idiot. He's not going to be against a billionaire tax as governor and magically be for it as president:what:. He flat out said what he stands for to sorkin
see, this is your problem right here. what a PERFECT example :wow:

progressives just say a bunch of shyt on the campaign trail that sounds good, because they never have to actually put it in effect. since you can't win any real seats, you never have to deliver results, or be held accountable

what the fukk would a progressive know about running a state budget, and trying to retain the billionaires that pay for all your "free" shyt? you can't win these seats, so you never actually have to do it :mjlol:

probably why Bernie's never passed a bill that wasn't naming a fukking post office
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
54,791
Reputation
3,247
Daps
153,950
see, this is your problem right here. what a PERFECT example :wow:

progressives just say a bunch of shyt on the campaign trail that sounds good, because they never have to actually put it in effect. since you can't win any real seats, you never have to deliver results, or be held accountable

what the fukk would a progressive know about running a state budget, and trying to retain the billionaires that pay for all your "free" shyt? you can't win these seats, so you never actually have to do it :mjlol:

probably why Bernie's never passed a bill that wasn't naming a fukking post office
Went from what democrat doesn't agree with Romney to typing all this pro billionaire babble :dead::wow:
 
Top