Democrats and Trans Rights

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

@the cac mamba

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Republicans tried to make Virginia's elections all about trans people. They lost everything. - LGBTQ Nation

Democrats swept the 3 statewide elections yesterday and picked up more seats in the state legislature.

www.lgbtqnation.com

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Republicans tried to make Virginia's elections all about trans people. They lost everything. - LGBTQ Nation

Democrats swept the 3 statewide elections yesterday and picked up more seats in the state legislature.

www.lgbtqnation.com

shut up you weirdo. go campaign on mutilating kids like you enjoy.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

"A Stunning Rebuke Of Anti-Trans Politics"—Dems Win Elections Nationwide Despite Anti-Trans Ads

As election results poured in on Tuesday night, it became clear that Democrats were winning nationwide against anti-trans opponents.

www.erininthemorning.com

New Poll: Voters Prefer Democratic Candidates Approach To Trans Rights Over Republicans

A new poll, which surveys voters who will partake in the New Jersey and Virginia governor races, found that voters were not impressed with Republican anti-trans positions.

www.erininthemorning.com

 

[the cac mamba]

imagine defending this

fukking liberals

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

WSU Suspends Hate Group's Medical Courses; Coalition Says Make It Permanent

The fallout comes after Erin in the Morning reported that WSU extended medical credentials to content from SEGM—an SPLC-branded hate group.

www.erininthemorning.com

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

"A Stunning Rebuke Of Anti-Trans Politics"—Dems Win Elections Nationwide Despite Anti-Trans Ads

As election results poured in on Tuesday night, it became clear that Democrats were winning nationwide against anti-trans opponents.

www.erininthemorning.com

New Poll: Voters Prefer Democratic Candidates Approach To Trans Rights Over Republicans

A new poll, which surveys voters who will partake in the New Jersey and Virginia governor races, found that voters were not impressed with Republican anti-trans positions.

www.erininthemorning.com

WSU Suspends Hate Group's Medical Courses; Coalition Says Make It Permanent

The fallout comes after Erin in the Morning reported that WSU extended medical credentials to content from SEGM—an SPLC-branded hate group.

www.erininthemorning.com

Is this a woman?

 

[the cac mamba]

another recognition week, for taking drugs and cutting your dikk off. jesus christ

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

The Trump Administration Just Quietly Walked Back Its Passport Invalidation Threat

Facing considerable backlash over hints it would attempt to revoke trans people's passports, the Department of State has now updated its website to remove the threat.

transitics.substack.com

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Ain’t no fukking way.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

Trump's Anti-Trans Report Authors Revealed: Hate Groups and Billionaire-Funded Anti-Trans Activists

The majority of the “expert” comments cited in the “peer review” seem to be just as ignorant as the authors about the reality of trans people’s care.

www.erininthemorning.com

Hate group talking heads, dark money beneficiaries, and career anti-trans activists have been revealed as authors behind a screed against trans health care, disguised as a Health & Human Services review.

Absent among the authors: Any actual transgender people, medical professionals with notable experience treating trans people, or any academics who have conducted principal research on patients with gender dysphoria.

This is unsurprising given the report was created for the explicit purpose of manufacturing the appearance of scientific rigor in support of transphobic legislation. It was commissioned via a January executive order calling life-saving gender-affirming care “chemical and surgical mutilation” and a “stain on our Nation’s history” that “must end.”

In other words, the 400+ page report was never meant to be a sincere academic endeavor. It is propaganda dressed up as science and, as per the order, its conclusion was pre-determined: “It is the policy of the United States that it will not fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called ‘transition’ of a child from one sex to another,” the order reads. (There are not actually any federal laws banning gender-affirming care.)

The original report, released in May, immediately came under fire for its shoddy methodology and dubious sourcing. At first, it did not even disclose its authors.

Now, nine author names have been released as part of the report’s final iteration—and it reads like a who’s-who of conservative gender extremism. Most of the authors are paid to travel the country providing “expert” testimony against gender affirming care, regardless of whether or not they have any credentials in that demographic of medicine.

The finalized report was accompanied by a bizarre 240-page addendum detailing its b*stardized version of a “peer review” process.

The majority of the “expert” comments cited in the “peer review”—save input from representatives of the American Psychiatric Association, who excoriated it—seem to be just as ignorant as the authors about the reality of trans people’s care.

Meanwhile, actual experts in peer-reviewed journals found “numerous violations of scientific norms” in the HHS report, calling it “a dangerous example of government incursion into the provision of evidence-based medical care.”

Another peer reviewed article notes that leading medical groups—such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychological Association, the World Professional Association for Transgender Health—“condemned the misrepresentation of scientific evidence in the HHS review and reaffirmed that GAC is the evidence-informed and ethical standard of care for children and adolescents with gender dysphoria.”

These papers were counted in the HHS report as incorporated “unsolicited peer reviews” despite being wholly independent and separate ventures.

The HHS report’s “peer review” process was riddled with other abnormalities, too. One contributor admits to creating a rubric for evaluation using Google Gemini AI, a language learning model.

Of course it was.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Trump's Anti-Trans Report Authors Revealed: Hate Groups and Billionaire-Funded Anti-Trans Activists

The majority of the “expert” comments cited in the “peer review” seem to be just as ignorant as the authors about the reality of trans people’s care.

www.erininthemorning.com

Of course it was.

a trans activist can’t be trusted on this if they dont even know what they themselves are