Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
You're just making up a whole bunch of shyt. 
Derrick Rose Is Lookin Like a Problem Brehs
- Thread starter EducatedBrothaFromTheBank
- Start date
No I'm not. How do you even come to this conclusion when you didn't watch the game?
When did I say none of his points was on Bradley? Where? And since when did shutting down a player means you have to keep them to ZERO points? And when did I say Curry shooting 3-11 was solely down to Bradley? Where? When did I ignore the differences with the on-court times? I already said before "when Bradley was on the court. Curry got shut down". Nothing but troll, troll, troll statements.
How the fukk do you know i quantify being shutdown as shooting poorly, when I never made mention of what it means to being shutdown? How'd you come to this?
Not it's not misleading to call Curry an elite 'offensive' player. Why are you even commenting on this Warriors/Celtics game when you didn't even watch it?
Look at this guy back tracking. So, I confront the bully and he runs away. Typical.
So, now the example you typed up backfired and you're trying to be abstract about what you meant.
Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
Back tracking? Where am i doing that?
I'll ask again -
When did I say none of his points was on Bradley? Where? And since when did shutting down a player means you have to keep them to ZERO points? And when did I say Curry shooting 3-11 was solely down to Bradley? Where? When did I ignore the differences with the on-court times? I already said before "when Bradley was on the court. Curry got shut down". Nothing but troll, troll, troll statements.
How the fukk do you know i quantify being shutdown as shooting poorly, when I never made mention of what it means to being shutdown? How'd you come to this?
Not it's not misleading to call Curry an elite 'offensive' player. Why are you even commenting on this Warriors/Celtics game when you didn't even watch it?
how do you know what I meant when i never said "curry scored zero buckets on bradley". Where did I say that being shutdown = shooting poorly? The problem with you is, you're jumping to conclusions based on how you interpret things.
this is you -
he said curry got shut down from bradley
that means he thinks getting shutdown = shooting poorly, he also means that curry got zero buckets on bradley, he also means that curry shooting a poor 3pt percentage was ALL down to bradley, that also means he ignored the times they were on the court, even when he said "when Bradley was on the court. Curry got shut down".
that's your process of thinking.
Back tracking? Where am i doing that?
I'll ask again -
When did I say none of his points was on Bradley? Where? And since when did shutting down a player means you have to keep them to ZERO points? And when did I say Curry shooting 3-11 was solely down to Bradley? Where? When did I ignore the differences with the on-court times? I already said before "when Bradley was on the court. Curry got shut down". Nothing but troll, troll, troll statements.
How the fukk do you know i quantify being shutdown as shooting poorly, when I never made mention of what it means to being shutdown? How'd you come to this?
Not it's not misleading to call Curry an elite 'offensive' player. Why are you even commenting on this Warriors/Celtics game when you didn't even watch it?
how do you know what I meant when i never said "curry scored zero buckets on bradley". Where did I say that being shutdown = shooting poorly? The problem with you is, you're jumping to conclusions based on how you interpret things.
this is you -
he said curry got shut down from bradley
that means he thinks getting shutdown = shooting poorly, he also means that curry got zero buckets on bradley, he also means that curry shooting a poor 3pt percentage was ALL down to bradley, that also means he ignored the times they were on the court, even when he said "when Bradley was on the court. Curry got shut down".
that's your process of thinking.
again back to back tracking. How many points in total FT and FG did Curry score on Bradley. Let's put this to rest.
You're the one calling Curry an elite PG...I did not mention Curry in any of the prior examples. I mentioned specific elite PG's and it's like you pop up with "John Wall got shut down by so and so". But I took the bait because I remember that game and media over hyped what Bradley did and Bradley was holding/grabbing Curry and getting called for a lot of those fouls. So how many points did Curry score when Bradley was in the game?
Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
the only one back tracking is you, cause you realise you fukked up.
WHY ARE YOU ASKING ME HOW MUCH HE SCORED ON BRADLEY? you seem to know all about this. you keep professing about their matchup.
you don't remember that game, you can't bullshyt me. why can't you answer the questions i gave to you before"? if anyone is back tracking its you.
Cuz your questions are stupid. I made factual statements and assessments that you are now backtracking on a trying to weasel your way out of this. I'm not going to let you and not going to turn this into a Q/A session.
You got caught in the media hype and despite Bradley being one of the top PG defenders he's been lit up before and this one game with Curry doesn't disprove anything I said about Elite PG's not being "shut down". You can't even tell me how many points, out of the 25, Curry scored on Bradley or why you consider he "shut down" Curry. If you shut down someone you take them completely out the game and you should be able to do it consistently (not 20 minutes worth) to dispel any notion that it was a bad game or a few bad moments in a game.
Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
It's funny how my one statement:
I gave no other information on why I thought Bradley shutdown Curry ..... and this is what you got out of what I said:
It seems you just ran to the box score and was like "well he must be talking about how Curry shot 6-22, he must mean that getting shutdown=shooting porrly, he must mean that NONE of those points were scored on bradley, he must mean a few moments when he played curry means he got shut down, he must mean his poor 3pt% was SOLELY down to bradley"
how the fukk does one think like that?
I gave no other information on why I thought Bradley shutdown Curry ..... and this is what you got out of what I said:
It seems you just ran to the box score and was like "well he must be talking about how Curry shot 6-22, he must mean that getting shutdown=shooting porrly, he must mean that NONE of those points were scored on bradley, he must mean a few moments when he played curry means he got shut down, he must mean his poor 3pt% was SOLELY down to bradley"
how the fukk does one think like that?
It's funny how my one statement:
I gave no other information on why I thought Bradley shutdown Curry ..... and this is what you got out of what I said:
It seems you just ran to the box score and was like "well he must be talking about how Curry shot 6-22, he must mean that getting shutdown=shooting porrly, he must mean that NONE of those points were scored on bradley, he must mean a few moments when he played curry means he got shut down, he must mean his poor 3pt% was SOLELY down to bradley"
how the fukk does one think like that?
I did check the boxscores to pull out the factual information. Why wouldn't I? Because you didn't, you look like a fool. Fact is you can't and have not explained yourself because I neutered any argument you might have had.
You're welcome.
Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
you didn't make shyt. im not back tracking at all. because i never said ANY of the shyt you're talking about. you grabbing shyt out of thin air.
CAUGHT IN THE MEDIA HYPE? i watched the game (unlike you). i was one of the very few on here who first noticed bradley's defensive abilities. curry scored about 1-2 buckets while he was guarded by bradley, but that wasn't why he got shutdown - see jumping to conclusions once again. he got shut down because bradley picked him up fullcourt on just bout every possession. and when the ball was out of his hands and curry was scrambling around screens trying get open, bradley hounded him and curry couldn't even attempt to get a shot off. it wasn't just because of his poor shooting.... see if you stop tryna act like you know what folk are talking about and ask "why do you think curry got shut down - was it because of poor shooting or something else" then maybe you won't look like a clown.
shutting someone down doesn't mean you take them completely out of the game completely 100%. curry still got a few assists and a bucket or two, but for 80-90% of the time when bradley was on him, he was a non-factor. that is getting shut down. he got ticky tack fouls called on him, that's why he only played 20 mins.
Last edited:
Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
that point isn't you running to the boxscore, the point is you not asking what i meant by 'getting shutdown' and not jumping to all these conclusions. you haven't nullified any argument of mine, all you've done is make yourself look stupid.
you wanna talk factual information... the box score isn't gonna tell you that bradley picked up curry on full court possesions, it isn't gonna tell you that he blanketed curry when he was running around screens. it isn't goinna tell you all those times curry wanted to shoot but couldn't because bradley was breathing down his beck. it isn't gonna tell you that curry had to pick up his dribble sooner than he wanted too because bradley's was tryna pick his pocket.
you aint got shyt.
that point isn't you running to the boxscore, the point is you not asking what i meant by 'getting shutdown' and not jumping to all these conclusions. you haven't nullified any argument of mine, all you've done is make yourself look stupid.
you wanna talk factual information... the box score isn't gonna tell you that bradley picked up curry on full court possesions, it isn't gonna tell you that he blanketed curry when he was running around screens. it isn't goinna tell you all those times curry wanted to shoot but couldn't because bradley was breathing down his beck. it isn't gonna tell you that curry had to pick up his dribble sooner than he wanted too because bradley's was tryna pick his pocket.
you aint got shyt.
so now you're trying to define "getting shutdown" but when I said it you immediately used this example, did you ever ask yourself what I meant by getting "shutdown". THis is a typical ploy tho from a troll...there's a common denominator we were arguing and now all of a sudden you're trying to redefine it because you're losing the debate.
last response regarding this topic as it's only cluttering what was a very good discussion.
Gil Scott-Heroin
Veteran
you're just making up shyt as you go now.
cornercommission2k12
so this were u dudes went
Yet those same offensive Pgs face Westbrook and rose and can't dominate the way they kill cp3 or rondo
The idea that rondo is a great defender is a rumor with no evidence to prove it
Again rondo gets good steal totals and y'all equate that to good defense when all it is, is gambling in the passing lanes
cornercommission2k12
so this were u dudes went
Look at this bytch Nikka god shambroad who backs down like a homo every time I slap him around uses the length of my post as his reason he backing down like a bytch
But in this thread he in here dapping all the long ass post 7'oclock posting
What a fukk boy
But in this thread he in here dapping all the long ass post 7'oclock posting
What a fukk boy
606onit
Superstar
@ page 7 Nicas is going at each other on some paragraph sh1t