I would take this media run with a large grain of salt first off.I understand that part. But you're telling me that the US-backed Afghani government didn't even secure more rights for women outside of the zones under the authority of warlords?
For example, the suddenly lost education prospects the women who are killing themselves are talking about in OP's article, don't they come from the American influence?
You honestly think you can reduce the entirety of the American-backed policy in Afghanistan to local tribal law?
Second there were areas where they allowed women more freedoms Kabul and around us facilities for increased us money, as I said in the beginning though these areas had increased drug usage and prostitution, those were taken away .
Yes I can easily reduce the us policy to that because that was the enacted us policy.

Our Faustian Bargains in Afghanistan
Afghan elections illuminate how ex-warlords’ influence continues to hold back democratic governance and threaten political stability, write Caroline Wadhams, Colin Cookman, and Christina Misunas.

US didn't care it was a money making MiC enterprise more than it was about anything else. Invasion wasn't even necessary as taliban told the us they would hand over bin laden in accordance with Islamic law to a neutral Muslim nation for charge and trial, Bush, Chaney, and rumsfueld rejected that offer and knew he ran off to Pakistan early on in the invasion.