destroying property/looting/physically harming others is NOT the answer!...

[Gains]

 

[BelowTheMasonDixon]

Yes, I'm preaching about violence in a country where killing young black males goes unanswered, why haven't the drum circle, sermons and kumbaya get togethers stopped it?

Violence is the answer in most questions, the people in power don't want that which is why they trumpet MLK and demonize Malcolm have you ever stopped to think why they're so pressed to do that? And they won't tell you Mandela was out here having people killed left and right for his cause and proudly chanted to kill all whites.

By that same token, why are violent uprisings and riots still around?

MLK has a MUCH larger historical impact than Malcolm X. I don't know if you understood that or not. Secondly Both Men were hunted and killed, EVEN though one taught non violence. IF you don't understand why that is significant I don't know what to tell you. Are you seriously going to sit here and compare the principles of non violence to Violent uprisings and riots.

 

[H.I.M.]

you are about to go to "war" with an enemy that wants to burn down your village...
instead you burn down your village for them...for what?..in hopes the enemy will go away...or aid will come from afar?
makes sense?...

wake up the next morning with your kids...

"ok kids i'm off to work...oh wait...we burned that down..."

"ok kids..lets go to the playground...oh wait...we burned that down..."

"ok kids...lets go get some food to feed your starving stomachs...oh wait...we burned down the supermarket that helps with that.."

"hey kids...we got news covered on us looting and burning down our community....change gon come now..."

this goes for Ferguson and anywhere else that can't see the ass backwardsness of this "strategy"

They were already under siege and subjection by the state... if you look at the arrest statistics by race in that town. Drastic changes aren't going to come without taking drastic steps... and that might entail sacrifice in the short term in order to gain in the long term. Your mode of thinking is very short sighted. Burning up that town is a good thing because it puts the state on notice and let's them know when they take out one of ours, we'll shut their city/town down...although i don't agree with the targets...it should be city/state/county/law enforcement buildings (and corpses ) on fire...not little ceasers & autozone....but what they're doing can be far more effective in enacting change than sitting around in large circles holding candlelights and singing church hyms.

 

[Gains]

this cac got what he deserved

 

[BelowTheMasonDixon]

Would you say that blacks in America are the most institutionally oppressed people that don't engage in "terrorism"?

Compared to the rest of the world Id say so, and a lot of the ones that do are "supported" by the rest of the world.

I think fear of losing white lives, not having a problem killing black males would change the dynamic.

That's good in theory, but surely you realize the Police are capable of killing WAAYYYYYYYYYYYYYY more of us than we are of them. What about that scenario, makes you think they would fall back after these violent clashes subsided.

 

[Super Ramon]

take that apu

 

[Ronnie Lott]

fukk just looting. nikkaz gotta really turn up and move into other areas. I'm not sayin that people shouldn't get violent, but direct that energy in the right direction.

I hope nikkaz can read in between the lines. And this is comin from s nikka who was actually out there in The streets last night in Oakland. I ain't just typin words on a gatdamn keyboard.

 

[missyleebunny]

Burning shyt to the ground will only make Black people look more like animals who need to be culled. And burning shyt down and attacking the police will garner very little sympathy from the world as well.

THINK homie.

If Black people are actively burning shyt to the ground, they lose any emotional capital built from The attacks on us by The Police.

They already think that we're inhuman animals whose lives hold no value therefore should not respond to the injustice of criminal acts against us, so who cares at this point.

You can only pervert justice so much before people become righteously indignant and retaliate.

Even Jesus started throwing stuff in the temple when people were misusing it.

 

[BelowTheMasonDixon]

They were already under siege and subjection by the state... if you look at the arrest statistics by race in that town. Drastic changes aren't going to come without taking drastic steps... and that might entail sacrifice in the short term in order to gain in the long term. Your mode of thinking is very short sighted. Burning up that town is a good thing because it puts the state on notice and let's them know when they take out one of ours, we'll shut their city/town down...although i don't agree with the targets...it should be city/state/county/law enforcement buildings (and corpses ) on fire...not little ceasers & autozone....but what they're doing can be far more effective in enacting change than sitting around in large circles holding candlelights and singing church hyms.

And this is why you dudes are fukking hilarious. You said homies way of thinking is short sighted, and then talk about holding candle lights and singing church hymns like those haven't been effective measures for change.

Buring up the town doesn't do shyt, but burn down buildings, that the citizens of Furgeson, Missouri frequently visit, shyt is dumb.

This whole Idea about violence as a movement would be much more effective (although very short lived) If they burned down the fukking St. Louis arches or some shyt, but we know that's not going to happen, The White part of Furgeson is gonna be GUCCI, long after all the other shyt is smoldering.

 

[BelowTheMasonDixon]

They already think that we're inhuman animals whose lives hold no value therefore should not respond to the injustice of criminal acts against us, so who cares at this point.

You can only pervert justice so much before people become righteously indignant and retaliate.

Even Jesus started throwing stuff in the temple when people were misusing it.

I wasn't talking about White people in that particular response. I was actually talking about the people around the globe witnessing and talking about this event. INTERNATIONAL PRESSURE is a big deal. I would go so far as to say cases like this should be taken before the United Nations.

And I don't have an issue with retaliation, I just think violent protest isn't a good form of it.

 

[Malta]

MLK has a MUCH larger historical impact than Malcolm X. I don't know if you understood that or not. Secondly Both Men were hunted and killed, EVEN though one taught non violence. IF you don't understand why that is significant I don't know what to tell you. Are you seriously going to sit here and compare the principles of non violence to Violent uprisings and riots.

It's like you can't connect the dots, MLK has a larger impact than Malcolm for a a very specific reason, if Malcolm's teaching were taught to children around the country how do you think they'd look at white people, you know...the ruling class.

Why isn't this side of Mandela taught -


You refuse the ask why a ruling class of people would prefer to have the teachings of a non-violent man be what we follow. I follow Malcolm's teachings, he is more in line with what we need, turning the other cheek just means you're gonna end up with your face hot.

 

[H.I.M.]

And this is why you dudes are fukking hilarious. You said homies way of thinking is short sighted, and then talk about holding candle lights and singing church hymns like those haven't been effective measures for change

 

[shutterguy]

I can only imagine if the the looters and riot squad had access to real weapons of mass destruction (grenades, launchers & rpg's, and sniper rifles), it would be WW3 in that city.

 

[BelowTheMasonDixon]

It's like you can't connect the dots, MLK has a larger impact than Malcolm for a a very specific reason, if Malcolm's teaching were taught to children around the country how do you think they'd look at white people, you know...the ruling class.

Why isn't this side of Mandela taught -


You refuse the ask why a ruling class of people would prefer to have the teachings of a non-violent man be what we follow. I follow Malcolm's teachings, he is more in line with what we need, turning the other cheek just means you're gonna end up with your face hot.

Man, What I'm telling you is White folks could give less than fukk about violence from Blacks THEN OR NOW nikka. Yall keep acting like White people worried about some militant Black uprising. They would have wiped our ass out in the 60's. The reason non violence worked is because they were pressured by the international community, and once that happened they were like fukk it. we'll integrate we gonna get Blacks money, so that took a bit of the sting out of it.

You keep acting like Black people in the 60's had half of the weaponry we possess now.

 

[Digga38]

They weren't.

The only one I know of that is is Antonio French's Heal STL, but he's a sellout that was offered a $500,000 loan to help supress the black protestors by the local government. And tried to make a ferguson newsletter with NYU grads and not Ferguson residents...fukk him.

I seen that 500k mentioned before sources?