Deep_Black_Conscious
Superstar
Seems as though developers and artists didn't know about this and seem to be against this.
Speaking with developers and artists at studios that have agreed to DLSS 5, including CAPCOM and Ubisoft, Insider Gaming was told that the DLSS 5 tech was revealed to them at the same time as everyone else.
"We found out at the same time as the public," said one Ubisoft developer.
Developers at CAPCOM tell Insider Gaming that the announcement and the publisher's involvement were particularly shocking, as CAPCOM has previously been historically very "anti-AI" with projects such as Resident Evil Requiem and other unannounced projects in development. Some at the publisher fear that the DLSS 5 announcement could prompt a change in the publisher's view on generative AI and its implementation in its games.
Source: NVIDIA CEO Says Gamers Are 'Completely Wrong' About DLSS 5
Another developer
:We have an exclusive comment. People are so fired up about that the people who make your video games decided to start reaching out to me to have their voices heard. So what I'm about say in my KFGD exclusive from an unnamed BAFTA Winning Developer, this was written to me:
This isn't a tool for devs at all. It's NVIDIA showing its stockholders, a lot of who are probably CEOs of publishers and funding houses, that they can fire more artists and still sell games. This is a tool for CEOs to get bigger bonuses. No artist or game devs who make games because they love making games and art will ever, ever, use this tech, ever. The idea that this will make creating games easier for X,Y and Z people is a red herring, no doubt in my mind. This is a cost cutting tool AKA more layoffs and more slop.:
Retweeted by Kojima
Speaking with developers and artists at studios that have agreed to DLSS 5, including CAPCOM and Ubisoft, Insider Gaming was told that the DLSS 5 tech was revealed to them at the same time as everyone else.
"We found out at the same time as the public," said one Ubisoft developer.
Developers at CAPCOM tell Insider Gaming that the announcement and the publisher's involvement were particularly shocking, as CAPCOM has previously been historically very "anti-AI" with projects such as Resident Evil Requiem and other unannounced projects in development. Some at the publisher fear that the DLSS 5 announcement could prompt a change in the publisher's view on generative AI and its implementation in its games.
Source: NVIDIA CEO Says Gamers Are 'Completely Wrong' About DLSS 5
Another developer
:We have an exclusive comment. People are so fired up about that the people who make your video games decided to start reaching out to me to have their voices heard. So what I'm about say in my KFGD exclusive from an unnamed BAFTA Winning Developer, this was written to me:
This isn't a tool for devs at all. It's NVIDIA showing its stockholders, a lot of who are probably CEOs of publishers and funding houses, that they can fire more artists and still sell games. This is a tool for CEOs to get bigger bonuses. No artist or game devs who make games because they love making games and art will ever, ever, use this tech, ever. The idea that this will make creating games easier for X,Y and Z people is a red herring, no doubt in my mind. This is a cost cutting tool AKA more layoffs and more slop.:
Retweeted by Kojima


