How about I tell you this guy never existed but was a mixture of more than one person
how could he have imposed the greek culture when it was an inverted form of the egyptian culture without the inclusion of the soul, the afterlife and immortality.. when you remove this you have a culture based on half of everything they found important.. why do you think that after the hyksos ruled the north of egypt in the 15th dynasty that so much art and architecture was defaced? We are living in a culture that celebrates and teaches 50% of the cultures before.. and we justify acts of barbarism like airstrikes on a random location as a result of it.. these people invaded.. were driven out.. rebuilt and invaded.. then destroyed the culture that reigned before.. its an inate need to pillage like the need to monopolise resources instead of looking for balance and its self destructiveAdmittedly I haven't learned as much about Alexander as I should have. All I know is he was an admirer of Egyptian culture and that may have been through his tutor Aristotle. But like Hogan said, rulers want to be worshipped like deities in those days, plus if Alexander was lookin to be a Pharaoh that'd make him a god since that's how they were viewed in Egypt so I guess the answer to the OP is yes. It was a Greek trying to legitimize himself to an ancient people that viewed their rulers as gods on Earth.
A strong link to religion was a means to political power/security in those days, that's translated itself into different forms throughout the years. First it was being chosen by a god or you flat out were a god, then empires became defenders of the faith and used it as a means to maintain control, gain economic advantages, or begin conflicts with rivals, everyone needs to look legitimate and in these days being a god was a good way of doing it. Power of religion also shows itself when rulers go too far, Akhenaten is a great example of taking too much liberty with the religion that made you legit, Emperor Susenyos of Ethiopia is another good example as he switched the country from Orthodox to Catholicism during the Middle Ages which eventually had him driven out in favor of his son and Jesuits massacred or exiled and the old religion was restored. Alexander was smart to adopt the customs of Egypt rather than imposing Greek culture on them.
lol my bad . Ive actually never been asked or even contemplated this question.. what brought it on in the first place?I like all these post.... but im debating sorta a prominent bytch about this... and you nigggas are throwing curve balls
Now I have to figure out if dude even existed and if hes a myth of more than one person
how could he have imposed the greek culture when it was an inverted form of the egyptian culture without the inclusion of the soul, the afterlife and immortality.. when you remove this you have a culture based on half of everything they found important.. why do you think that after the hyksos ruled the north of egypt in the 15th dynasty that so much art and architecture was defaced? We are living in a culture that celebrates and teaches 50% of the cultures before.. and we justify acts of barbarism like airstrikes on a random location as a result of it.. these people invaded.. were driven out.. rebuilt and invaded.. then destroyed the culture that reigned before.. its an inate need to pillage like the need to monopolise resources instead of looking for balance and its self destructive
true.. interesting that the dark side of human nature becomes more viable the further we get from a culture that is based on consciousness and the afterlife in the present lifeWell yeah of course to the bolded, but even then that wouldn't stop a more ignorant less appreciative conqueror from attempting to change things. But I guess that only underscores your point since it was clear Alexander had a deep understanding of the importance of Egyptian culture to his Greek heritage.
The rest of what you're talking about is just the dark side of human nature. We may be intelligent but we're still animals and are capable of vile things from then til now.
Im not an atheist.. but im being forced to argue against a religious person about human nature and how religion is used to control and mentally brainwash people. The larger issue is about how certain cultures gained control and why maybe the ancient egy people may have preferred greek rule over Persian rule.lol my bad . Ive actually never been asked or even contemplated this question.. what brought it on in the first place?
true.. interesting that the dark side of human nature becomes more viable the further we get from a culture that is based on consciousness and the afterlife in the present life