Did Atlantis exist?

Atlantis is..

  • Based on something real

  • A historical Ducktale


Results are only viewable after voting.
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
46,769
Reputation
3,430
Daps
114,843
Reppin
NULL
Can we stop with this nonsense about an 'advanced pre-historic civilization'?

There is NO evidence that one existed and ALL the evidence offered in support of that hypothesis comes from Nazis/'White Supremacists' in the 19th/early-20th Century.​

You saying there is no scientific evidence level than an extinction level event occurred on this planet?
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,040
Daps
122,408
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
If our ancient ancestors had advanced tech wouldn't we be finding traces of it?
Absolutely, but all we've found have been giant piles of rocks a few thousand years old.

No lasers, anti-gravity devices, spaceships, scanning devices, navigation tools, buildings, etc.

Hell, we've made dinner plates that will still be here a thousand years after we're extinct, but this 'advanced civilization' left NOTHING.​
 

CourtesyFlush

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
8,289
Reputation
-167
Daps
38,001
Reppin
NULL
Absolutely, but all we've found have been giant piles of rocks a few thousand years old.

No lasers, anti-gravity devices, spaceships, scanning devices, navigation tools, buildings, etc.

Hell, we've made dinner plates that will still be here a thousand years after we're extinct, but this 'advanced civilization' left NOTHING.​
Conspiracy theorists are amazing at finding tiny plot holes in reality but then miss the giant gaping plot holes in their conspiracies
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,040
Daps
122,408
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Conspiracy theorists are amazing at finding tiny plot holes in reality but then miss the giant gaping plot holes in their conspiracies
They aren't even 'plot holes'. They are things that science hasn't come to a consensus on until further evidence is provided. To them, that means 'Science can't explain it!!!!', therefore, aliens/advanced civilization is a more plausible explanation than human ingenuity and a LOT of time.

Occam's Razor needs sharpening.​
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,040
Daps
122,408
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Entire civilizations can be covered up if left untouched. It's been approximated that only 10-15% of history has been 'found'.
That doesn't prove there was a civilization that spawned ALL the rest and until there is objectively verifiable evidence attesting to it, claiming there was is pseudoarchaeology/pseudohistory/pseudoscience.

Why?

Circular reasoning.​
 

Skooby

Alone In My Zone
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
25,660
Reputation
10,620
Daps
60,665
Reppin
The Cosmos
That doesn't prove there was a civilization that spawned ALL the rest and until there is objectively verifiable evidence attesting to it, claiming there was is pseudoarchaeology/pseudohistory/pseudoscience.

Why?

Circular reasoning.​
I didn't say there was. I'm merely stating that there still much to uncover.
 
Top