BobbyBooshay
Arnold Jackson
Not directly imo
Nicole was fukking the restaurant owner that Ron worked at. He had mob ties and she apparently was a drug addict who owed money to a few undesirables. Not to mention all the other dudes she was confirmed to have been fukking at the same time. OJ had been doing the ole dance with the bytch for years, nothing about what she was doing was new to him that wouldve made him cut the bytch head off. shyt was business as usual for him. But to one of those other nikkas she was fukking with, they didnt know her like that. They'd be way more emotional over the situation. The level of malice needed to gash them up the way they were, was far more than OJ wouldve had at that point. That bytch owed money and seriously pissed someone not named OJ off.Nah u cant kill two people and have that little blood in ur car.
Lapd set him up.
Nicole and ron was doing drugs and dealiing with shady people.
A hit was put on them
i dont know if he did it, but i KNOW he knows who did it. those were not the actions of a man who didn't know what happened![]()
Forensic Scientist Dr. Henry Lee proved that the little blood evidence they had on OJ was consistent with blood being dropped or planted, and not consistent with blood splattered in other crime scenes he investigated left by the perpetrator. Several months after the trial, they aired Dr Lees' interview laying all this out on the program "Crime Detectives". The program was cancelled that following season. I wish I had recorded that episode. Anyway, this is what the defense presented to the jury. Then Johnny Cochran closed the deal with, "If it don't fit, you must acquit". This was the real reason it took the jury only a few hours to find OJ innocent. They didn't even need to hear Mark Furman. That was something the media focused on, and made it seem like that was the only reason OJ was acquitted, taking credit away from the great job the defense team did.Yes. His DNA was at the scene, most likely from cutting himself during the crime. Granted DNA was not as widely understood before this trial but that alone would be enough if the trial was held today.
But this trial was was held after the LA riots and there was enough reasonable doubt and failure on the prosecution case that him getting off isn't suprising.
That wasn't a chase. OJ being a running back, the media hyped it up and called it a chase. OJ was scheduled to turn himself in, and he basically just took his time doing it, after the media had already convicted him. Now what James Brown did was a chase. But all and all, not a good move by OJ.
what the fukk was that bronco chase if he had no idea who killed heri dont even think he did it, it probably doesnt make sense because they would have found blood on him and in the car. what dudes said about his son doing it makes sense
or maybe noti dont fukkin know
the case was important because it made it clear that if you have enough money, you can enjoy a taste of some of the privilege that white people get in the justice system
After watching the 30 for 30 movies about him. That man definitely did that shyt. But the case was important because it made it clear that if you have enough money, you can enjoy a taste of some of the privilege that white people get in the justice system
NeggedAfter watching the 30 for 30 movies about him. That man definitely did that shyt. But the case was important because it made it clear that if you have enough money, you can enjoy a taste of some of the privilege that white people get in the justice system