Did the Oklahoma bomber have help from al-Qa'ida's explosives expert?

[Black Panther]

A few things:

1. I applaud YouTube for adding a banner underneath conspiracy YouTube videos that links to the relevant Encyclopedia Britannica article. :mjlolhairfade:

2. To @Ian1362 :

Black police officer who was first at the scene mysteriously "committed suicide"



More bizzare deaths and fbi "losing" crucial evidence

Kenneth Michael Trentadue - Wikipedia

The YouTuber you posted was identified as part of a Russian disinformation campaign that spreads Russian propaganda, according to PropOrNot.

The List

3. To @newworldafro :

I'll just leave this here ...listen @1.25 or 1.5 speed...so you can move on with your day, but still get the info

This YouTube channel posts #QAnon, Pizzagate, and Democratic "Satanist" conspiracy theories, and praises Paul Joseph Watson, an alt-right conspiracy theorist.

Not to mention more Russian propaganda. The top suggested video after this one literally is an RT video titled "Best Putin Jokes."

SAD:trumpynsick:

 

[levitate]

But his book stirs up some troubling unanswered questions about Mr Nichols' many trips to the Philippines in the years preceding the bombing

Ehhh... Was likely just fukking prostitutes...

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Ehhh... Was likely just fukking prostitutes...

thats already accounted for. He says he met his wife out there...but he's calling the area when his wife isn't there.

Do the math.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

1. I applaud YouTube for adding a banner underneath conspiracy YouTube videos that links to the Encyclopedia Britannica articles. :mjlolhairfade:

 

[newworldafro]

A few things:

1. I applaud YouTube for adding a banner underneath conspiracy YouTube videos that links to the relevant Encyclopedia Britannica article. :mjlolhairfade:

2. To @Ian1362 :




The YouTuber you posted was identified as part of a Russian disinformation campaign that spreads Russian propaganda, according to PropOrNot.

The List

3. To @newworldafro :


This YouTube channel posts #QAnon, Pizzagate, and Democratic "Satanist" conspiracy theories, and praises Paul Joseph Watson, an alt-right conspiracy theorist.

Not to mention more Russian propaganda. The top suggested video after this one literally is an RT video titled "Best Putin Jokes."

SAD:trumpynsick:

This documentary was made 7 years ago.

This account is showing the video, not the creators of the video
Your repetitive deflection tactics are getting boring...try another angle.

Until you actually watch the video, and see the interviews from real people on the ground and analysis of the event, you're just pouting and huffing and puffing like a 2 year old in a tantrum.

Have no problem with the "official story" just below the video, so people can easily see what is being said on both ends and can make up their own mind. I prefer that over outright censorship and deplatforming.

 

[Black Panther]

This account is showing the video, not the creators of the video

The video's wrong, too.

 

[newworldafro]

The video's wrong, too.

Have you watched the video?





Of course you haven't. How are yoy making determinations about a documentary you haven't watched.

 

[Black Panther]

Have you watched the video?





Of course you haven't. How are yoy making determinations about a documentary you haven't watched.

I watched this documentary about four years ago, around the first time I watched the first Zeitgeist movie. :smugkobe1:

How are you making determinations on what I have watched? :stephena1:

 

[newworldafro]

I watched this documentary about four years ago, around the first time I watched the first Zeitgeist movie. :smugkobe1:

How are you making determinations on what I have watched? :stephena1:

Touche.

SO what are they wrong about?
100%. Nothing they said was based in fact?
All the people they interviewed are conspiracy theorists? The mother of Terrence Hanley is a tinfoil hatter?

What are saying?

 

[Ian1362]

A few things:



2. To @Ian1362 :




The YouTuber you posted was identified as part of a Russian disinformation campaign that spreads Russian propaganda, according to PropOrNot.

The List

So you just mindlessly follow the opinions of other persons, assuming they suggest they have expertise? The interview in the YT video is from 1998. The primary source document material is out there if you want PDFs. Whatreallyhappened was founded in 1996, when the Russian government establishment was so incompetent they couldn't even power military facilities consistently, and two years before the government defaulted on its debt. But muh Russians. PropOrNot lists snopes as a related source, even though snopes fired Brooke Binkowski after she got thrown under the bus for partisan hackery in snopes political fact checking.

You can't even read the site you linked correctly, it lists sites that "reliably echo Russian propaganda"; notwithstanding cause and effect (are Russians echoing American conspiracies or are American conspiracies influencing Russian disinfo), propornot doesn't bother to differentiate other than to suggest a priori that the origin is Russians.

If you have any questions, or run an outlet which you feel has been unfairly categorized, please contact us. We are happy to remove any outlet whose operators understand how [lmao holy shyt the self aggrandizement is palpable] Putin's Russia is a brutal authoritarian kleptocracy that uses "fake news" as online propaganda, and resolves to help do something about it.

might as well have linked to revleft as an example of nonpartisan research.

 

[Ian1362]

Have you watched the video?





Of course you haven't. How are yoy making determinations about a documentary you haven't watched.

Because some failed buzzfeed writer joined propornot and conflated it with Russian propaganda. Who needs to think for themselves when we can adjudicate to experts.

 

[Black Panther]

So you just mindlessly follow the opinions of other persons, assuming they suggest they have expertise?

...Didn't you ask everyone to do the same thing by pointing to this video?

Because some failed buzzfeed writer joined propornot and conflated it with Russian propaganda. Who needs to think for themselves when we can adjudicate to experts.

Unless you're claiming to be an expert...aren't you asking everyone to do the same thing by pointing to this video?

My point is, why is the source you're citing more plausibly true?

Even if PropOrNot is wrong--which you haven't actually shown--does this somehow mean that the video you posted is accurate?