Did Washington give up too much to get RG3?

Heelmatic

The Carolina Blueprint
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
9,280
Reputation
1,187
Daps
17,359
Reppin
NC
This guy thinks so...

Trading away the world for Robert Griffin III. Fans of RGIII will consider this blasphemy. When healthy,he is indeed among the most brilliant young quarterbacks in the game (though he has a great deal of competition in that category right now). But just because a player is spectacular does not mean he is worth any price. And Griffin, famously,had a price to the Washington NFL team far higher than his $4.8 million effective pay this year (salary plus pro-rated signing bonus) would imply.

Griffin was taken second in the 2012 NFL draft,but the team had only the No. 6 pick. To get the higher pick in the draft,they traded away their 2012 first- and second-round picks and their 2013 and 2014 first-round picks.

That was foolish. Since the 2011 revamped deal between the NFL and the players' union,every draft pick is a license to get a young,promising player,at below what his market rate would be if there were a simple auction for talent. The Washington team traded away its ability to replenish its ranks of younger players for three years in exchange for one (albeit,extraordinarily talented) player.

Yes,quarterback is the most important position on the field. Yes,a great one can change a team's fortunes. But great teams win championships not by finding one great player and wildly overpaying him (in this case,in the form of draft picks rather than cash).

In the 2000s,10men have been Super Bowl-winning quarterbacks. Only two of them,Peyton and Eli Manning, were first overall picks in the draft. The other eight winners range from the No. 6 player drafted overall (Trent Dilfer),to late first round picks like Drew Brees and Aaron Rodgers (two of the best quarterbacks of the last few years) to late,late selections Tom Brady (199th overall),Brad Johnson (227th) or Kurt Warner (not drafted at all). Last year's Super Bowl pitted a No. 18 selected quarterback (Joe Flacco) over No. 36 (Colin Kaepernick).

In other words,the teams that have had the ultimate success in the NFL have done so not by expensive trades to snag the shiniest object they see, but by finding value wherever it falls and putting together the best overall team.

And if one team was going to trade away a ton of valuable picks to get one splashy quarterback, Washington could afford it least of all. And that's because of management's second major error of recent years.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...reasons-the-redskins-cant-win-a-game/?hpid=z4
 

Captain Crunch

Veteran
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
45,296
Reputation
2,837
Daps
114,692
Reppin
NY
He still is great, they rushed him, it'd be great if he got outta others and ended up in Minnesota.
 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,600
Reputation
-17,871
Daps
84,293
Reppin
NULL
where were these articles last year when he won Washington their first divisional title in over a decade?

where were these articles last year when he won ROY over the best QB rookie class in NFL history?

where were these articles last year when he took a 3-6 team to 10-6 and the playoffs?

This question is ridiculous. He totally changed a franchise that was toiling in irrelevance for the better part of a decade. He changed the entire culture there and he was the sole reason so many people were so high on them coming into this season. The redskins STOLE RGIII, forget about giving up too much.
 

Lucky_Lefty

Dreams Are Colder Than Death...
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
49,668
Reputation
7,325
Daps
131,039
Reppin
Purgatory
ppreflex.gif
 

PhonZhi

Veteran
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
24,039
Reputation
7,665
Daps
98,983
Reppin
Atl, Ga by way of Alabama
where were these articles last year when he won Washington their first divisional title in over a decade?

where were these articles last year when he won ROY over the best QB rookie class in NFL history?

where were these articles last year when he took a 3-6 team to 10-6 and the playoffs?

This question is ridiculous. He totally changed a franchise that was toiling in irrelevance for the better part of a decade. He changed the entire culture there and he was the sole reason so many people were so high on them coming into this season. The redskins STOLE RGIII, forget about giving up too much.
this is sports media breh. let him win his next 2 games and they'll be back on the bandwagon
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,164
Reputation
-4,768
Daps
35,658
Reppin
NULL
If RG3 doesn't elevate the franchise going forward, the answer is yes. Given his playing style and the fact he's only one man, the smart GM factors into the trade equation the probability, however small or large it might seem, his star running QB might get injured or might otherwise not work out. The good GM then makes the decision to either spread the risk by drafting all over the board or instead concentrate it on that one guy. The latter is what the Redskins did and it could end up being a bad decision. If RG3 doesn't play up to last year's potential, then indeed Washington gave too much for him. Hindsight is 20/20 but putting all your eggs in one basket is mostly ill-advised in betting odds.
 
Last edited:

mozichrome

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 17, 2012
Messages
89,780
Reputation
4,416
Daps
131,592
Reppin
NULL
If RG3 doesn't elevate the franchise going forward, the answer is yes. Given his playing style and the fact he's only one man, the smart GM factors in the probability a star running QB might get injured into the trade equation. He then makes the decision to either spread the risk by drafting all over the board or concentrate it on that one guy. The latter is what the Redskins did and it could end up being a bad decision. And if RG3 doesn't play up to last year's potential, then indeed Washington gave too much for him.

but we know RG3 can operate from the pocket. yes they want him to run to give them another dimension, but you give him solid WRs and he's healthy we know he can win from there
 
Top