Did We Really Land on The Moon??? (Sketchy ass Nixon Phone Call)

Did We Land on the Moon?

  • Yes

    Votes: 23 56.1%
  • No

    Votes: 18 43.9%

  • Total voters
    41

Elim Garak

Veteran
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Messages
44,245
Reputation
8,618
Daps
217,518
This aint the place to show skepticism..

My thunn had a pulse phone calling the moon..

We got certain places in America where there is no cell service.. and this is after 50 years of innovation.

Its fake fam..
If you use a satellite phone there is no such thing as a dead spot. That's the same technology that was used to make the phone call to the moon.
 

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
44,071
Reputation
9,714
Daps
107,392
This is why this country is fukked. All nikkas do is deny any type of science and just promote conspiracy and ignorance. Straight out of a dictators playbook.




Blindly believe the white man brehs:francis:. And not any ol white man,but white men from the 1960s who were famous for lying and orchestrating coverups:mjlol:

The moon landing wouldnt be in the top 10 of the worst shyt they covered up lol
 

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
44,071
Reputation
9,714
Daps
107,392
Imma do ya one better...

HIV was a biolab synthesis of the primate SIV. It was reversed engineered with the purpose of killing off homosexuals and black men. The Govt panicked when it got into women and in the blood supply. It was too perfect of a killer disease. In fact the only perfect disease because it's transmission of infection was sexual.

I have another one....

Black Elbows...have you heard about that? :mjlit:


Great post as usual king.

And heres one last note about the Robert Rayford story.

"There is one final theory about this first AIDS case in America that I will put forth for all of those who love to sink their teeth into a good conspiracy theory. In the book The River, a theory is advanced that Robert became vulnerable to the illnesses during the 1950s when the Army Chemical Corps conducted open-air chemical warfare tests in American cities. These included 35 aerosol releases in and around St. Louis. Most of those tests were conducted in low income neighborhoods, allegedly to minimize public resistance to such tests. One of those test areas was only half a block from the house in which Robert was born. These tests, conducted at the height of the Cold War, were explained away to local officials as being simple smoke screen experiments designed to shield U.S. cities in the event of a Soviet attack.
Decades later it was revealed that those tests involved zinc cadmium sulfide, a mixture of zinc sulfide and cadmium sulfide. It’s frequently referred to as a fluorescent particle because it glows in ultraviolet light. This quality makes it easy to trace for efficacy after the fact. However, cadmium is a highly toxic metal that is even more pernicious when spread through the air. Because the kidneys absorb it quickly, it is commonly associated with kidney failure, leads to cirrhosis of the liver and causes severe damage to the lungs and body cavities. All of these conditions were noted in Robert R’s report. Also, the effects can be passed by a mother to her fetus, so it’s entirely possible that Robert may have developed the seeds of his illness while still in the womb.
We’ll most likely never know the whole truth about the death of Robert Rayford — in part because we weren’t looking for the answers in the context of AIDS. We are content to label him as the first victim of a terrible epidemic that ran unchecked through our nation during the Moral Majority driven Reagan Revolution. Most of the knowledge gained about AIDS in the two decades between Robert Rayford’s death and ultimate diagnosis came from research and development, not from doctors and hospitals, but from the victims themselves. We Americans owe a great debt of gratitude for our understanding of this dread disease to those who have suffered, and often died, while searching for a cure — Robert Rayford, a mere medical footnote in history, among them."



Same old story:respect:
 

tay1

All Star
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
1,664
Reputation
332
Daps
6,582
It is ridiculously expensive today to launch a rocket into orbit.

It didn't make sense to continuously go back to the moon after we did it the first time.

Tired of all of the anti-intellectualist BS on the internet.
 
Top