Diddy’s lawyer reviewed 9 freak off tapes and said Cassie appears to be happy, enjoying herself & dominant/in control

[Sir Richard Spirit]

FREE PUFFY

 

[bourgeoisie tall freak]

So how can the government prove he did? It works both ways.

the same way they prove it in every case. someone goes on the stand and gives testimony. he's already been caught lying about denying what cassie has said happened.

 

[T-K-G]

I seriously doubt it. Nothing like that has ever happened, not to say it can't but I really don't see it

TMZ calls you with 7 figures you gonna send them whatever, not like you were gonna make that amount working in the evidence dept.

 

[MicIsGod]

It'll end the weird obsession with wanting to see these celebs naked for sure


Case wise nah, if even one person is on one video being forced to do something they gonna cook him

I think the video may not show force. Probably just sex. But the hotel beating video is all you need to imply she had no choice

 

[ℒℴѵℯJay ELECTUA]

F R E E DIDDY

 

[Solo_87]

Just because his lawyer reviewed the tapes and according to him it looks consensual, I don't think that's enough to say he's never forced her to perform sexual acts against her will.

True

They couldn't charge him with sexual assault/rape to much time has pass

They charged him with sex trafficking Cassie

I believe kidnapping as well

Besides the videos wonder what other evidence they got

 

[T-K-G]

I think the video may not show force. Probably just sex. But the hotel beating video is all you need to imply she had no choice

Oh I was talking about the other people


Cassie's situation is an obvious "she feared for her life" defense, dude was way too possessive with that woman

 

[DontEemTry]

I think the video may not show force. Probably just sex. But the hotel beating video is all you need to imply she had no choice

That sounds like a weak ass case. Do the videos show any sex trafficking is the real question

 

[Born2BKing]

the same way they prove it in every case. someone goes on the stand and gives testimony. he's already been caught lying about denying what cassie has said happened.

No evidence needed but word of mouth? Thats usually how defenses loses cases, especially when the defendant waited 20+ years to come forward.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

the same way they prove it in every case. someone goes on the stand and gives testimony. he's already been caught lying about denying what cassie has said happened.

Naw to convict for trafficking or coercion there has to be some hard evidence. Some type of payments or threats, admissions, etc.

Can’t just be a person saying it happened.

 

[Consigliere]

There was a flood of misinformation that came out when he got hemmed up. Lawsuits based on bs, fake news stories, imaginary victims.l, child abuse, gang rapes, kidnapping. Tons of press based on hearsay.

You could even argue that the tape of him beating Cassie was put out there to prejudice the jury.

I don’t think any of that should be necessary if he’s guilty. Even if we don’t like the person.

 

[MicIsGod]

That sounds like a weak ass case. Do the videos show any sex trafficking is the real question

Remember he also dragged her back to the room. That’s a pretty strong case actually.

 

[Cryptocurrency Scarface]

The lawyer sounds like a deviant

 

[bigde09]

Well if Diddy’s lawyers are saying this then it must be true free Diddy!

 

[mson]

There was a flood of misinformation that came out when he got hemmed up. Lawsuits based on bs, fake news stories, imaginary victims.l, child abuse, gang rapes, kidnapping. Tons of press based on hearsay.

You could even argue that the tape of him beating Cassie was put out there to prejudice the jury.

I don’t think any of that should be necessary if he’s guilty. Even if we don’t like the person.

Argue?