O³ (O cubed)
No more PAWGs, PLEASE??!!!??
The guy who posted the tweet has his answer. Xbox Series S/X. The parity clause is the answer.
Digital Foundry suggest MS should be asking questions about why Devs ain't using those extra Flops.
- Thread starter The Mad Titan
- Start date
The guy who posted the tweet has his answer. Xbox Series S/X. The parity clause is the answer.
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
If the twitter user has a rainbow starfield avatar, crash bandicoot, or the xbox logo just throw the whole tweet in the bushes
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
But yes, starfield a game that runs at 30fps with a loading screen every two minutes go unmentioned in this thread, must be sonys fault that game runs like ass
But yes, starfield a game that runs at 30fps with a loading screen every two minutes go unmentioned in this thread, must be sonys fault that game runs like ass
Higher resolution on xbox.
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
No more bloodclaat excuses from these developers
4k/60 fps needs to be the standard
This is also why exclusives are better. Insomniac says Spider Man 2 will have 4k/60fps with ray tracing
I don't wanna hear it
4k/60 fps needs to be the standard
This is also why exclusives are better. Insomniac says Spider Man 2 will have 4k/60fps with ray tracing
I don't wanna hear it
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
Spider-man 2 will be 60fps with ray tracing, instant loading, with 4k upscaling and starfield can only run at a shaky 30 fps with a ton of loading screens. But yes, it is a PS5 parity clause holding Xbox games back
With a dead ass city, last gen graphics, assets and lighting. Can’t go in buildings.Spider-man 2 will be 60fps with ray tracing, instant loading, with 4k upscaling and starfield can only run at a shaky 30 fps with a ton of loading screens. But yes, it is a PS5 parity clause holding Xbox games back
shyt don’t even have a day night cycle.
nikkas playing 2010 technology with 2023 graphics settings
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
Sounds like starfield
Todd Howard says Starfield's barren planets are boring on purpose
To be fair, not all 1,000 planets can be fun
And imagine calling a game with actual ray tracing inferior
I think by the end of the year more people will consider Spider-Man 2 a next gen experience over Starfield, especially since its runs at over 30fps
Last edited:
The Stan Titan
Rookie
Yup. The game looks far clearer even on Series S than the PS5. It's close to the PC version even. I saw it on a high end PC and it wasn't that much better than the Series S.
As if that has anywhere near the scope of StarfieldSpider-man 2 will be 60fps with ray tracing, instant loading, with 4k upscaling and starfield can only run at a shaky 30 fps with a ton of loading screens. But yes, it is a PS5 parity clause holding Xbox games back
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
As if that has anywhere near the scope of Starfield
Yeah, it won’t have dozens loading screens breaking up the map
Have no idea what you're talking about brehsYeah, it won’t have dozens loading screens breaking up the map
