Digital Foundry vs. Dead Rising 3: Struggle FPS

daze23

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
32,624
Reputation
2,755
Daps
45,402
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-dead-rising-3



Inevitably, much of this comes at a price; specifically to the frame-rate. When dealing with the signature scenes involving uncountable enemies on-screen, we're left with some very sluggish motion, while the streaming system also seems to spike CPU, resulting in lost performance. The statement from the team is that a locked 30fps is targeted here, but in the build we saw there's a huge gap to be bridged in this regard; drops to 20fps are consistent and sustained when outdoors, with 16fps being our record low during some of the biggest explosions. With Battlefield 4 on Xbox One, the drop to 720p opened the door to 60fps gameplay - Dead Rising 3's big issue is that despite the upgrades, the feeling in terms of refresh and response often feels very much like a poorly optimised current-gen title.

The day-lit fifth chapter proves slightly smoother in the frame-rate stakes, mainly due to it funnelling us through a few more interior areas to push the story along. Boss fights and side-missions here tend to be much less of a strain for the hardware, but once again, exiting a building to be met with an undead parade still gives us that unwanted drop to 20fps. With tearing absent from the majority of Xbox One launch titles, we're left to wonder how performance may have benefited here from having even an adaptive v-sync in place - though on balance the removal of tearing altogether on the build we saw is a warmly welcomed choice.

With all its rough edges, Dead Rising 3's intended impact as a next-gen title is clearly dulled, but there's enough here to show early Xbox One adopters a side of the zombie-slaying experience that couldn't be achieved on current-gen hardware. The zombie count and overall world size are impressive - amplified to a previously unheard volume where interplay with vehicles ties in appropriately with this shift in scale. However, the fact remains that the game's original brief as an Xbox 360 title is still very much felt in other areas; the pared-back alpha, texture streaming issues and jagged 720p presentation giving the impression that the series' potential is still somehow being bounded.

It's also unfortunate that the game runs at far from the promised locked 30fps - rather a chugging 20fps during the zombie action while out in the big city. Compared to the shaky E3 build seen just months ago this is still a respectable step forward, and of course many of the game's technical shortcomings come with the unique circumstances of meeting a hardware launch. All this amounts to an intriguing first attempt, then, but needless to say we're eager to see how Capcom Vancouver follows up on its sandbox survival-horror formula when it's given more breathing room with the deadline, more experience with the hardware, and factoring in the next-gen platform's strengths from the very start.
Click to expand...

:hamster:
 
Rekkapryde

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Hall of Fame
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
159,262
Reputation
31,577
Daps
540,816
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
720p struggle framerate huh...struggle dippin down to 20....at 720p?

popcorn_big_48.gif
 
Kingshango

Kingshango

Veteran
Joined
Jul 28, 2013
Messages
30,071
Reputation
9,038
Daps
152,222
Reppin
Chicago
ibaqiVjF4CGrfL.jpg


You gotta be shytting me? :dahell:

This shyt is unacceptable on current gen consoles, let alone next gen.
 
STAN JONES

STAN JONES

Fire John Harbaugh
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
30,206
Reputation
5,679
Daps
66,950
Reppin
Baltimore
i was passing on this shyt regardless

my new rule is if the game aint atleast 30 gigs then im not wasting my money on it

i think this shyt is like 18 or 19 gig :scusthov:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top