Digital Foundry vs. Dead Rising 3: Struggle FPS

[ChrisDorner]

Disappointed? Yes a little, though I still think the game will be a lot of fun.

I honestly don't see the problem with the textures. No they aren't the best by any means, but they look good and are a huge step above plenty of last gen open world games. As are the lighting/shadows and other graphical effects.

I think people are holding this game to unfair standards. Will all of you be disappointed when it comes out that killzone can't keep a stable framerate?

@ unfair standards

You show me killzone.. No.. ANY PS4 exclusive hitting 16 FPS

No.. ANY PS4 exclusive even hitting below 20 & I guarantee you'll see me shytting on it too


Just admit this is trash nikka like damn

Y'all the same people trippin that the ps4 takes 10 more seconds to boot up but can't admit this game is a technical failure

 

[MeachTheMonster]

No Meach, stop this madness man. A next gen, not current gen, but NEXT GEN console struggling with 720p 30fps? It's one thing to dip a few frames when tons of shyt are on screen, but to drop 30 and 40 percent for a next gen console?

This is HELLA disappointing and moreso rediculous. MS chose poorly and the word about the weakness of the console only continues to spread like wildfire esp in this day and age.

When has a console not struggled with framerates or making graphical concessions for performace? Especially at launch.

When ps3 games were launching with their framerates halved or the resolutions compromised, or without even being able to match 360 effects, where any of you running around talking about how it was ridiculous or how the ps3 was serverly underpowered?

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Looks shytty that's ok

Shifty framerate that's okay

Killzone unstable (but not even remotely anywhere as bad as dead risings) framerate? TRASH

Never said killzone was trash. I asked will y'all hold it to the same standards. The PS4 is the most powerful gaming machine ever. Surely it should have no problem with framerates right?

 

[ChrisDorner]

When ps3 games were launching with their framerates halved or the resolutions compromised, or without even being able to match 360 effects, where any of you running around talking about how it was ridiculous or how the ps3 was serverly underpowered?

This is ps4 and Xbox one we're talking about, thought we made that clear

Ol "bu bu bu the console that dropped in 2006 had the same problems!" Ass nikka

 

[ChrisDorner]

Never said killzone was trash. I asked will y'all hold it to the same standards. The PS4 is the most powerful gaming machine ever. Surely it should have no problem with framerates right?

& so far it doesn't have a problem with framerate. Unless you think ~30 FPS is a "problem"

Then I guess you won't be playing much of anything on Xbox with that logic

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Yes I can ignore the rest

All y'all bring up is killzones framerate, let's ignore how it has the best shadows & lighting effects in any next gen shooter & maybe any next gen GAME to date

And y'all ignore that DR3 has the most A.I and the most shyt going on on screen than any other next gen game to date.

 

[GoldenGlove]

Game looks repetitive and boring. Have fun with it though...

Now these dudes in here acting like they weren't hyping this game when they heard about it.

So we bringing up the devs NOW, but there wasn't any mention of them when the game was announced, it was all praise.

"Look at Dead Rising 3 yal!!!"

 

[daze23]

Yes I can ignore the rest

All y'all bring up is killzones framerate, let's ignore how it has the best shadows & lighting effects in any next gen shooter & maybe any next gen GAME to date

will the best shadows and lighting be worth it if it's pushing struggle framerates? (hypothetical question)

it's similar to saying DR3 has struggle framerates because it has the more NPC's than any next gen game

 

[ChrisDorner]

And y'all ignore that DR3 has the most A.I and the most shyt going on on screen than any other next gen game to date.

But at what cost

If the console can't handle it then it can't handle it Tryna force more zombies at the cost of cell phone quality textures & sub 20 framerates

 

[MeachTheMonster]

This is ps4 and Xbox one we're talking about, thought we made that clear

Ol "bu bu bu the console that dropped in 2006 had the same problems!" Ass nikka

Nah. Y'all making all these bold statements about what these obviously rushed(as all launch titles are) mean about the Xbox one in the future. But not one of you was making those staments when the gulf in performance was even larger last gen.

Why is that?

 

[ChrisDorner]

will the best shadows and lighting be worth it if it's pushing struggle framerates? (hypothetical question)

it's similar to saying DR3 has struggle framerates because it has the more NPC's than any next gen game

You show me killzone hitting below 20 & I'll laugh just as hard. Trust me.

Would y'all be okay with DR3 being 2FPS if it had a million enemies on screen? At some point you've gotta make sure the game runs atleast DECENTLY

 

[The G.O.D II]

When has a console not struggled with framerates or making graphical concessions for performace? Especially at launch.

When ps3 games were launching with their framerates halved or the resolutions compromised, or without even being able to match 360 effects, where any of you running around talking about how it was ridiculous or how the ps3 was serverly underpowered?

So that should be the standard huh? Because it happened last gen its ok for this huh? Wait for smooth to finish washing his face so he can help you out breh.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

@ unfair standards

You show me killzone.. No.. ANY PS4 exclusive hitting 16 FPS

No.. ANY PS4 exclusive even hitting below 20 & I guarantee you'll see me shytting on it too


Just admit this is trash nikka like damn

Y'all the same people trippin that the ps4 takes 10 more seconds to boot up but can't admit this game is a technical failure

TLOU which y'all praised to high hell had a consistent sub 30fps framerate. And none of you seemed to care a bit

 

[ChrisDorner]

Nah. Y'all making all these bold statements about what these obviously rushed(as all launch titles are) mean about the Xbox one in the future. But not one of you was making those staments when the gulf in performance was even larger last gen.

Why is that?

i was when ps3 dropped & most of the games were trash. You didn't know Chris deezy when that shyt dropped so don't even act like it

 

[Rekkapryde]

When has a console not struggled with framerates or making graphical concessions for performace? Especially at launch.

When ps3 games were launching with their framerates halved or the resolutions compromised, or without even being able to match 360 effects, where any of you running around talking about how it was ridiculous or how the ps3 was serverly underpowered?

Totally different because the PS3 HAD THE POWER, it was just difficult programming for. That situation was resolved as cats got familar with programming and the shyt caught up.

Both systems have the same architecture this time, just one much stronger and it's showing. There is nothing they can catch up on power wise like cats with the cell programming on the ps3.

Shaky 720p is unnaceptable. Point blank. If it was 1080p dipping some frames, that's one thing (and by some frames, not by 30 - 40% dips).

The game is struggling at 720p dawg!! That is disgusting.