Besides HOF and MVP candidate Dirk, HOF and 2010 All-Star Jason Kidd, borderline-HOF Shawn Marion, 2012 DPOY and All-NBA Tyson Chandler, and 20ppg scorer in the postseason Jason Terry they had no one!
You mean except in 2015 when Lebron as the only All-star on his squad swept the Hawks with four All-stars?
2014 when Tony Parker was the only All-star on his squad and nearly swept the Heat with three All-stars?
2011 when Boston had FOUR all-stars, yet would have been beat by the single All-star Bulls or Mavs if they had played?
Why is the number of All-Stars even a meaningful measure of anything?
Spurs and Lakers were more top-heavy than the Mavs in 2011 too...so why Lakers get swept and Spurs not even get to them?
This is an actual meaningful look at the matchup:
Point Guard: Advantage Mavs
Shooting Guard: Advantage Heat
Small Forward: Advantage Heat
Power Forward: Advantage Mavs
Center: Advantage Mavs
Bench: Advantage Mavs
Coach: Advantage Mavs
breh you obviously lack reading comprehension
i specifically said he was the only all star THAT YEAR... and one of two HOF... i did not say he had no one.. i didn't say he played 1-2 on 13.. i did not say what nikkas was doing in 2010.. i didn't say anything else you pointlessly said
then you take your stanning to the next level... and name years where people did none of what i said and go into a rant
i specifically said no team will EVER WIN A RING LIKE THAT AGAIN... you go on to name a conference championship... the time tony parker was the only all star while playing with 3 other HOFers.. a make believe scenario where boston WOULD have lost IF they played... and some other stupid shyt
so i'll stick to MY point until it's proven wrong... there will never be another team in the NBA, that has 1 all star that year and 2 aging HOFers who win a ring. not when these teams are teaming up with no less than a big 3 in their primes to win