Disneyland agrees to pay its workers $15 an hour

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

OP praising Bernie for 15 an hour in Cali.

Min wage in Vermont is 10.50

Vermont is PAYING people to live there

Vermont will pay people $10,000 to move there and work remotely

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Probably because Bernie is the only politician who fights for workers, it's also why he's the most popular politician in the US

Thats interesting.

Did Bernie vote for this in CALIFORNIA?

 

[Strapped]

OP praising Bernie for 15 an hour in Cali.

Cali = 20plus

 

[Domingo Halliburton]

Vermont is PAYING people to live there

Vermont will pay people $10,000 to move there and work remotely

Was this supposed to be an argument to the posts you quoted?

 

[Secure Da Bag]

Imagine the most liberal state in the country needing Bernie sanders to push liberal policy.

The alleged bluest of blue states have sabotaged their own Medicare-For-All and Net Neutrality bills. That was done by Democrats who have a supermajority in CA Congress. Not to mention that too many of the BS 911 calls have been coming out of CA and its liberal cities.

It seems CA, as liberal as it claims to be, still needs Bernie to keep them on the right path.

 

[Pressure]

The alleged bluest of blue states have sabotaged their own Medicare-For-All and Net Neutrality bills. That was done by Democrats who have a supermajority in CA Congress. Not to mention that too many of the BS 911 calls have been coming out of CA and its liberal cities.

It seems CA, as liberal as it claims to be, still needs Bernie to keep them on the right path.

They couldn't afford it.

I'd hate to see how y'all spend money.

 

[Secure Da Bag]

They couldn't afford it.

I'd hate to see how y'all spend money.

If they couldn't afford it, then the bill gets voted and it fails. There's no need to sabotage the bill outright. Affordability doesn't seem to be the issue. Donor wishes seem to influence that.

States don't spend money the same way actual people do. Comparing the two isn't fair or accurate.

 

[Pressure]

If they couldn't afford it, then the bill gets voted and it fails. There's no need to sabotage the bill outright. Affordability doesn't seem to be the issue. Donor wishes seem to influence that.

States don't spend money the same way actual people do. Comparing the two isn't fair or accurate.

No, this is nonsense. It's absurd to bring bills to the table that you can't afford.

And a lot. Of this is because of how much California spends as a donor state to save other parts of the country.

UHC has to be national with how our government is setup.

 

[Secure Da Bag]

No, this is nonsense. It's absurd to bring bills to the table that you can't afford.

If it was that absurd it would fail without anyone needing to sabotage anything. And again, they did this with MFA and Net Neutrality. So affordability could be used as an excuse for MFA. But it can't be used for Net Neutrality.

 

[Pressure]

If it was that absurd it would fail without anyone needing to sabotage anything. And again, they did this with MFA and Net Neutrality. So affordability could be used as an excuse for MFA. But it can't be used for Net Neutrality.

It wasn't sabotaged. Every bill doesn't come to full house for a vote.

This conversation is fukking stupid.

California dems votes for simple payer, but now I'm casting them as against it because they couldn't afford it at a state level.

 

[Sohh_lifted]

in disney world florida, most of the young people working are interns and hell to the nah they not makin $15 lol

 

[Secure Da Bag]

It wasn't sabotaged.

It was.