Divorce Plunged in Kentucky. Equal Custody for Fathers Is a Big Reason Why

[KFBF]

50/50 should be the default unless the parents want something else but I don't think it has anything to do with divorce rates. Unless they're saying women are pursuing divorce elss often because they won't get child support due to 50/50 split.

Or wait do they still get support with equal split?

 

[Still Benefited]

Xactly

This isn't about just child support.

This about being unable to escape your partner till the kids turns 18 anyway. Especially with rents / housing and other necessities increasing.

i was thinking the same exact thing when i read the thread title. some women divorce to protect children from a violent father so it would also make sense that if the children would have equal time with an abusive father in a divorce then that would increase the chances of them being abused without the other there to run interference and protect them.

a lot of factors could be why the divorce rate fell even more than the national average.

So lets take the white men out of the equation since it seems to be effecting yalls way of thinking. So are you saying that most BLACK women who leave their baby daddy are doing so because BLACK MEN are abusive? because statistcally that would speak volumes.


No,i dont think you would draw that random conclusion. So why put a fly in the ointment to shyt on this? This is a great law thats long overdue. I could make the sinister assumption its less appealing for women to leave when they no longer have control. So whats the difference in men wanting control like the women had? And not more control,but equal control. Report and explain yourself please

 

[Neuromancer]

Equal custody puts a lot more weight on a white dude used to having a woman that handles all the day-to-day shyt. Now he's got the kids half the time instead of just during summers or weekends. He gotta cook and keep his place clean more often

Couldn't this create more responsible fathers or at least more involved ones?

 

[Still Benefited]

Simp as Slaves came to cape fast as fukk. One second these nikkas saying they hate white folks now they crying to save the white women

You see whats going on.


If this was about black men getting more control in their divorces,I can say for 100% fact people would not be jumping to conclusions like "Most black women are just trying to get away from abusive black men". They would be celebrating talking about "justice for black fathers!" or "City Boyz up".



This is exactly what black men need among other law changes. If you care about women being abused,push for more protections and resources for victims. If you think thats why most women in abusive relationships stay

 

[Uachet]

You see whats going on.


If this was about black men getting more control in their divorces,I can say for 100% fact people would not be jumping to conclusions like "Most black women are just trying to get away from abusive black men". They would be celebrating talking about "justice for black fathers!" or "City Boyz up".



This is exactly what black men need among other law changes. If you care about women being abused,push for more protections and resources for victims. If you think thats why most women in abusive relationships stay

I have to admit, he makes an effective point on this. Work on the problem you fear is happening, instead of giving carte blanche power that can, and has, been easily abused in the past.

Let it be sorted by each circumstance that the courts can study, instead of assumptions on outcomes based purely on the sex of the litigants.

 

[Apollo Creed]

Couldn't this create more responsible fathers or at least more involved ones?

this is misandry the laws favoring women has nothing to do with responsible fathers. Bending to the will of the mother is not being a Responsible father.

 

[Apollo Creed]

50/50 should be the default unless the parents want something else but I don't think it has anything to do with divorce rates. Unless they're saying women are pursuing divorce elss often because they won't get child support due to 50/50 split.

Or wait do they still get support with equal split?

Exactly 50/50 by default and none of that moving to make shyt difficult. If a parent has a new job post divorce that requires relocation then there can be negotiation i.e. introduce Child support to offset % change of custody.

 

[King Sun]

All the divorced bitter losers gone run in to cheer this.


When majority of the cases is white women trying to leave abusive ass crackas and rather stay to protect the child instead of let the kids have alone time with the abuser.

shyt should always be a case by case basis. And not skewed towards the mother or father. And definitely shouldn't be equal time regardless of the situation.

Using Kentucky as a standard of anything

 

[Legend27]

From what I understand this doesn’t really change anything and in fact can be argue it is more so negative

 

[Dallas' 4 Eva]

Good, it's long overdue people finally start seeing who the real problem in these situations are... here's a hint 95% of the time it isn't the men.

What was that song last decade, these hoes be acting up and these nikkas be letting em... mufukkas ain't letting these hoes act up no more and it's about damn time.

 

[IsThatBrothaMouzone?]

Couldn't this create more responsible fathers or at least more involved ones?

Yeah if they divorce.....more likely they'll work harder to stay in a bad marriage. Stats showing that's what they're doing.

 

[Sterling Archer]

makes sense. these hoes are gonna be second guessing trying to leave u, when they know that the default judgement will be for them to share custody and thus her NOT get any child support out of the divorce.

Bingo

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

All the divorced bitter losers gone run in to cheer this.


When majority of the cases is white women trying to leave abusive ass crackas and rather stay to protect the child instead of let the kids have alone time with the abuser.

shyt should always be a case by case basis. And not skewed towards the mother or father. And definitely shouldn't be equal time regardless of the situation.

You truly are retarded........

 

[Xyrax]

If a woman wants to leave me, she can leave. She’s just going to cheat anyway. I don’t understand this push to force women to be with, or stay with men they don’t want.

Im not sure why you think people disagree. Remember, this law isn't supposed to keep couples together really (even if thats what red hats think it will do). There's a small 5% or so difference in KY divorce, but it dropped nationwide by 18% anyway. So that 25% isn't all about this change.

This just makes joint custody the default. It doesn't force it to be the outcome, but it does START with joint custody as the baseline, which always made sense. It never should have leaned to one parent over another by default. Makes no sense.

shyt should always be a case by case basis. And not skewed towards the mother or father. And definitely shouldn't be equal time regardless of the situation.

Ironically, you just described this law afaik. Thats exactly what it does.

Default assumption: Joint custody
Changing it from Joint Custody to something else?: Considered on a case by case basis.
Equal time to both parents?: Depends on the situation.

Thats...... That actually makes sense if I am reading this right. Red states and Republicans are morons who are probably doing this to try and fukk with Women, but the broken clock is right twice a day. This should work as a default; because the current system which literally does skew against a father by default certainly makes no sense.

As much as I think this is a good thing (in hopes of people just fukking and having kids, or getting divorced off “vibes” of the internet) the states that are doing it makes it hard to trust it’s actually for the benefit of men…

They are definitely not doing it for the right reasons, even if it can have the effect of bettering the system we have to a small degree. Their intent is malicious. That much we all know.

Has this law been around long enough to show the law is causation not correlation?

No, not yet. The difference in KY versus nationwide is within the margin of error really.

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

This about being unable to escape your partner till the kids turns 18 anyway. Especially with rents / housing and other necessities increasing.

It's obvious you nor that dumb ass nikka you posted have kids..... this aint got shyt to do with it...... the rule talks about shared custody of the kids... nothing to do with alimony or some form of spousal support.... besides.... the scenario you're describing will not apply to the overwhelming majority of divorced couples