DJ Vlad Thinks he's hated because he's WHITE. Dodges racism question.
- Thread starter WheresWallace
- Start date
jilla82
Veteran
whose more popular...Combat Jack, or Vlad?Not good ones tho. He asks questions either about meaningless shyt, or shyt to get people angry and up his views. Hes a culture vulture dawg. He has so much access to hip hop artists and he does nothing with it. Compare Vlad to Combat Jack for example. It's clear to see who cares more about the culture.
And Ive been peeping your game... not really in the mood for your c00nish contrarian bullshyt today
If there was no demand for what he provides, he would not be popular and making money.
Be mad at the market...not the person who provides the service (same for WSHH).
Im about money...not bullshyt feelings.
mortuus est
Veteran
lol not 4 mill, i read somewhere it was 300,000
MewTwo
Freeing Pokemon From Their Masters Since 1996
Look at all the shyt they say about white people to Vlad's face. And he doesn't say shyt
DonKnock
KPJ Gonna Save Us
His content is starting to be very polarizing. On one side he has whores like Karinne Steffans & Jhonni Blaze and ignorant trolls like Daylyt & Kevin Gates. But he is also giving his platform to people like Star, Jamar, Suga Free, Erick Sermon, Grandmaster Caz, Bambaataa, Dr. Watkins etc.
The dumb shyt is really what brings in the views unfortunately, even mainstream media operates this way. Rarely, if ever, do they show people affecting their community in a positive way on MSNBC, CNN, or Fox. Its always War, Crime, Scandal, or Political bs.
Vlad is definitely not part of the solution here, but his site could be worse. The internet as a whole is a cesspool of filth. I can't argue with anyone labeling him a culture vulture, but he saw a demand in the market and he filled it. Capitalism at work. I would be interested to know if he does any sort of charity work though.
The dumb shyt is really what brings in the views unfortunately, even mainstream media operates this way. Rarely, if ever, do they show people affecting their community in a positive way on MSNBC, CNN, or Fox. Its always War, Crime, Scandal, or Political bs.
Vlad is definitely not part of the solution here, but his site could be worse. The internet as a whole is a cesspool of filth. I can't argue with anyone labeling him a culture vulture, but he saw a demand in the market and he filled it. Capitalism at work. I would be interested to know if he does any sort of charity work though.
Here's the problem with Vladimir, he's making a ton of money off of mostly black guests but none of them get paid for it. If I have ads that pay me and you're the one in the video, why shouldn't you get some of the bread? It would be a little different if the guests got to shout out their product, album, whatever in the videos. But the way they're edited they don't even know which parts will be uploaded and in what order.
On top of not sharing the money, Cac TV instigates beef between black people and then profits off of it. It doesn't make any sense why we allow him to do that. The dude asks Lord Jamar questions and then turns around asking people about the 'inflammatory' bits that LJ responds with. That's trying to get people to say controversial quotes to generate clicks.
For the record, a couple of positive guests like Dr. Watkins (mind you, only when he'd gotten on the Breakfast Club) doesn't negate all of the fukkery he purposely engenders. For example that '50 Cent' remark they asked Larry Holmes about was wild disrespectful to a legend.
And quite frankly, if we're going to have a channel full of ratchet interviews, we should be the ones making money from it. fukk getting everyone else rich when we're in dead last.
On top of not sharing the money, Cac TV instigates beef between black people and then profits off of it. It doesn't make any sense why we allow him to do that. The dude asks Lord Jamar questions and then turns around asking people about the 'inflammatory' bits that LJ responds with. That's trying to get people to say controversial quotes to generate clicks.
For the record, a couple of positive guests like Dr. Watkins (mind you, only when he'd gotten on the Breakfast Club) doesn't negate all of the fukkery he purposely engenders. For example that '50 Cent' remark they asked Larry Holmes about was wild disrespectful to a legend.
And quite frankly, if we're going to have a channel full of ratchet interviews, we should be the ones making money from it. fukk getting everyone else rich when we're in dead last.