humble forever
All Star
blue eyed cacs are rare and last dude to worship them was hitler
Nah actually that would be you family knowing your a fakkit


Your question was/is stupid and has no real basis. You wish I would deflect so you can your vast list of stupid smilies but carry on dude. Where are all these people at that do whatever the fukk you exactly say in the OP that made you come up with a post a chick would or you going to remix a smilie for that one too? You asking this question so where the evidence this going on where its a problem. Maybe @Premeditated and @Detroit Wave sees this since they agreeing and can show where this happening at esp premeditated who I asked where this go on at but the nikka had no answers.
It not a deflection find the few people in the world this apply to and ask them but they not in here unless you scarred to name namesNow you're talking about smilies...:mjthink:
Why the deflections? Just answer the question.![]()
Brown eyes are a dominant genetic trait. Most people without them are looked at as exotical..![]()

...I mean, since usually coo...black people say that they like green/blue eyes because it looks "exotic". Well, light eyes are normal to most cacs and dark eyes/black eyes are relatively exotic to them. :thinking:
They've been around longer. In Africa where majority of human evolution has been stamped it's lighter than most of the other world [via being by the equator etc.]. So brown eyes were beneficial in that enviroment more so than light. Once travelers went to Europe/Asia light colored eyes (hazel, green, blue, orange) became because it's more beneficial to see in the dark with lighter eyes. Don't get it twisted, "dominant" genetics just means it's older and more prevalent due to its age, doesn't mean shyt when it comes to superiority inferiority. No such thing as superior genetics / inferior genetics. They become inferior once they are depleted from the earth 100%. I personally prefer lighter eyes on chicks, they're just better looking![]()

Breh, im aware of genetics. tha fuq you trying to argue me down for?
Are they called "dominant" and "recessive" traits? Yes.
So FOH with the history lesson. I'm aware of what it really means and the context in which I used it was STILL correct. The entire first part of that post is pointless and argumentative when it comes to this topic.

It takes two to argue, you're the dumb fukk who just assumed because I extended on your hollow post that I was initiating an argument![]()
![]()

A lotta deflections being thrown left and right.
![]()
