Do dems still claim leaks were fabricated?

[southpawstyle]

When they were first being released a lot of people that were implicated said the leaks were outright lies and made up. That narrative seemed to die out, and the recent hysteria surrounding Russia make the original leaks seem more credible. I'm not asking if Russia was involved or the significance of the leaks, just wondering if Democrats still argue that they were a hoax.

 

[Pressure]

I'm pretty sure the Democrat's position was that the idea that these e-mails contained a smoking gun or a bombshell was false.

The other part was Americans should be equally, if not more, outraged that Russia is hacking our political officials and parties in order to sway an election.

This was all down played by Trump and his supporters who vehemently denied Russian involvement and said this was just democrat sour grapes.

But rewrite history.

 

[southpawstyle]

I dont know if you meant that I was rewriting history, but some of the DNC definitely claimed some emails were completely fake or tampered with.

 

[Pressure]

I dont know if you meant that I was rewriting history, but some of the DNC definitely claimed some emails were completely fake or tampered with.

Well they did determine one of the emails was reported as written by podesta when it was a copy of an article written in a publication.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

The emails didn't show anything outside of work place banter.

But you let Wikileaks make the headlines instead of reading the emails yourself

 

[southpawstyle]

The emails didn't show anything outside of work place banter.

But you let Wikileaks make the headlines instead of reading the emails yourself

Calm down, girl. I wasn't attacking your team.