I will deal with this one last time.
You're sarcastically focusing with a specific grand-scale, half-millennia-plus issue and obviously being emotional about it. Nonetheless;
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. Isn't the "Dark Ages" supposedly a cover-up of the period of time the Moors, who many American Negroes swear were exactly like us, ruled the continent of Europe?
Was the Spanish Inquisition and the Reconquista not a campaign to reclaim Iberia? Was the African slave trade not established by Iberians?
These are all these "human responses" you believe are the end of the rope. Meanwhile, European whites (and Americans) are not replacing themselves via birth rates, a topic that has been celebrated on here. American whites in the decades of playing fields becoming even (relatively) are finding themselves in or within six degrees of separation from a substance abuse epidemic, on top of shooting themselves in the foot socioeconomically for allowing the same sense of supremacy to elect an aspiring dictator whose sending them up shyt's creek. Is this not a case of consequences or just desserts? Smoking and snorting themselves away while unable to uphold their population?
Humans are not fully independent of God/A Higher Power/The Universe/whatever you call it (or don't call/believe it). You need to understand karma on an individual level before trying to disprove it with flippant statements regarding entire continents and diasporas over thousands of years.
If you believe a soul is truly only on the planet Terra a single time, the YOLO aspect of that is why people do bullshyt and contribute to the ills of the world. But even so, there's still "Judgement" in the afterlife...aka karma.
Based on your earlier reply, I'm surprised you even dignify my flippant statements with a response. And I'm not trying to change you mind, just demonstrate how lazy an argument that is.
I'm emotional! Okay. "Deal" with what exactly? A differing opinion on a message board? You're too kind, I don't wish to burden you.
Now "maybe it is, maybe it isn't". That's different than what you initially said. And I'm not trying to be "rain-made" like the wire.
Im just going off your assertion. And I outlined two simple examples of that fallacious thinking, or how that could be "weoponized".
They are human responses. Human responses aren't karma. Karma by definition isn't a human response, rather "universe". Karma that supposedly skips generations? How many? Is it everlasting?
Let's just agree to disagree man. I used the Serbs first as an example.
I've got to contend with human bias and discrimination and ... But alas, that could just be me bearing the fruits of karma from the actions of my predecessors. Maybe i didnt get that job or promotion because my great great great great grandfather stole a piece of fruit from a market in the XXth century. (Yes that is meant to sound absurd). And still, that's dangerous thinking to me. And defeatist. Curse of Ham shyt.
I don't need cope. I can't atone for my predecessors actions, or will i try to. Nor do I blame them for my current condition, or some "cosmic justice". I believe in a more internal locus of control (to a degree), even in a world where so many things are predetermined for you. Actions have reaction and response, absolutely. But thats human condition. I say i refuse to believe that because otherwise, how else can you really have "hope"? Only to be potentially undermined by "karma"? Maybe my son's son's son will get cancer because I fukked that girl out of wedlock. Someone gone blame that on me?
Im really not emotional man, I'm more transactional than anything. Trying to get better everyday that I live.
Peace to you nonetheless, good discussion
