That has nothing to do with OP’s original question.
Do you believe it is a man's nature to be monogamous?
- Thread starter Finesse
- Start date
That has nothing to do with OP’s original question.
It doesn’t mean it was natural. Polygamy is a construct based upon resources and is no way natural.
Wtf are you babbling about
The utterly stupid premise of OP’s thread. Are you too dense to understand, just say that.
You’re either a fakkit or a dumbass but ok
I specifically said attraction is natural. Thats it.
You’re the only stupid b*stard on the thread that can’t comprehend OP’s original question. Stop replying to me hoe ass nikka! Thanks.
Westbama Heartthrob
Irregular Zero
It makes the most sense from an evolutionary standpoint. Keeping the same group and procreation with on family would have made things easier for hunter gatherers.
Plus, it was only so many people. Population was way smaller, so having multiple partners wouldn't be possible for the vast majority of people.
Non-monogamy has never been a thing for the majority. Only reserved by a small portion of people. So how can it be in people's nature?
And humans aren't the only species to me monogamous. So it's not a social construct we've invented.
At the end of the day though, it doesn't really matter if it's instinctual or not. We all can make our own choices of what type of relationship we want to be in. If someone wants to be monogamous, more power to em. Same if they don't want to be.
As long as they communicate that to a partner or set of partners, I don't see a problem
Plus, it was only so many people. Population was way smaller, so having multiple partners wouldn't be possible for the vast majority of people.
Non-monogamy has never been a thing for the majority. Only reserved by a small portion of people. So how can it be in people's nature?
And humans aren't the only species to me monogamous. So it's not a social construct we've invented.
At the end of the day though, it doesn't really matter if it's instinctual or not. We all can make our own choices of what type of relationship we want to be in. If someone wants to be monogamous, more power to em. Same if they don't want to be.
As long as they communicate that to a partner or set of partners, I don't see a problem
Last edited:
BigTyme Records
Superstar
biologically. No.
There’s a reason why Sex is mostly just physical for men. We are designed to spread our seed.
There’s a reason why Sex is mostly just physical for men. We are designed to spread our seed.
Magic Mulatto
Here Today, Gone Tomorrow. . .
It be the nikkas who acting like they gonna die if they can’t cheat, that can barley get p*ssy from one women, let alone multiple 
Vandelay
Life is absurd. Lean into it.
No, but as society becomes more complex, monogamy is needed to promote a stable, healthy society. There's a lot of shyt that's human nature that isn’t necessarily productive.
Have you seen the effects of men spreading their seed within their own gene pool???
Biologically, monogamy is the ordinary course of nature.
Nykkas love using mental gymnastics to justify hedonism.
BigTyme Records
Superstar
I mean why argue biology Nikkas gon naturally want to fukk new bytches no matter how good they main girl is.
That shyt will NEVER stop.