Hood Critic
The Power Circle
I don't disagree.The party is slowly being changed from the inside out she will be fine.
I'd like to see her have a productive career in politics

I don't disagree.The party is slowly being changed from the inside out she will be fine.
She will unless she gets frustrated.I don't disagree.
I'd like to see her have a productive career in politics
![]()
Surprised he actually asked....not surprised her answer is unintelligible.
There is no answer...
The issue with socialism, as I see it, is that everyone thinks their particular version is the one that will work because they acknowledge "pure socialism" (re: actual socialism) is utopian and impossible (as Marx said). So, they skirt that by saying being a socialist is "relative", and it devolves into an incoherent code word for nothing at all other than being "woke".To me this answer makes sense because I believe something very similar I would have gone about it slightly differently though. No one is asking for pure socialism imo.
How are they incompatible if we have a mix of the two right now?The issue with socialism, as I see it, is that everyone thinks their particular version is the one that will work because they acknowledge "pure socialism" (re: actual socialism) is utopian and impossible (as Marx said). So, they skirt that by saying being a socialist is "relative", and it devolves into an incoherent code word for nothing at all other than being "woke".
Socialism is the antithesis of Capitalism (again , Marx's words). They are incompatible with each other unless you start changing definitions....at which point youre more concerned with being indentified as a socialist than you are with actual socialism...I'm sorry..."pure socialism".
I mean, what exactly did she say that you are in agreement with? All I got was that current socialists can't agree on what socialism means, but to her it means "democratic economics". Really? Charles Fourier is rolling in his grave lol.
Because we don't. What we have is historic wealth inequality. So, rather than laughing, maybe go read up on what socialism is. It's not just government funding for social programs....unless, of course, you're a new age socialist with a "relative" definition...in which case, good luck with that. You're only reinforcing my point.How are they incompatible if we have a mix of the two right now?![]()
:aocumad:can't believe you got faqqets like @19- negging me bc they want to play symantics....so what she doesn't have a big donor, bankrolled just means to finance something, which is exactly what the Brand New Congress did along with thousands of other canidates...AOC is just the one who got through
Nothing what she says is organic, her support isnt homegrown. All of her talking points and things like the "Green New Deal" were in place before she was ever elected..they are just using her to push through their agendas
cant believe people are in love with this basic bytch, gurantee she was topping off that dot head in a bar somewhere on the campaign trail before she was elected
Lmao stay mad I guess I'm not doing a pointless back and forth all dayBecause we don't. What we have is historic wealth inequality. So, rather than laughing, maybe go read up on what socialism is. It's not just government funding for social programs....unless, of course, you're a new age socialist with a "relative" definition...in which case, good luck with that. You're only reinforcing my point.
I don't know anything about her. I am glad she's spicing things up and bringing diversity... and all that.shes already developed her own cult like following who can find no fault in any word or action of hers and many are in this forum, she's going no where
i like and respect this chick, but that doesnt mean im gonna sit around and cosign her talking out of her assI don't know anything about her. I am glad she's spicing things up and bringing diversity... and all that.
But this green new deal of hers sounds like some comic book ironman man of the future type stuff. It's absolutely unrealistic.