Does anyone view the media differently after election?

Gyasi85

Superstar
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
11,024
Reputation
1,041
Daps
30,286
If it took the outright fukkery of the 2016 Elections to get people to look at the media "differently" they already LOST :francis: Media been looking funny in the light for a long time...:usure: Where these people been ?:what: Like they ain't know Trump was funny style (Central Park Five ):beli: or Hillary was the White Griselda Blanco (Vince Foster, White Water, etc) :beli: shyt i dun even blame the media...If somebody gun pay me to lie through my teeth...shyt so be it :yeshrug: I blame these Wilfull ignorant Sheep that swallow this BS like they ain't got a lick of common sense..:martin:.and dun get me started with black folk :why:
 

Long Live The Kane

Tyrant Titan
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
17,318
Reputation
5,059
Daps
65,101
Not really... the whole "liberal msm" trope has been beat into the ground so much for at least a decade, it basically means nothing... "conservative media" is as mainstream as fukking anything and people have long since chose which particular echo chamber they prefer to have give their slanted view ... it's funny to have people complain about the damn New York Times as some kind of tool of public hypnosis when the vast majority of Americans ain't actually read a newspaper in years, fake news conservative facebook sites are "informing" ridiculous portions of the electorate and Fox News is playing on tv in the majority of McDonalds in the country
 

Yakno1

Banned
Joined
Mar 2, 2013
Messages
3,555
Reputation
51
Daps
6,273
Reppin
NULL
Not really... the whole "liberal msm" trope has been beat into the ground so much for at least a decade, it basically means nothing... "conservative media" is as mainstream as fukking anything and people have long since chose which particular echo chamber they prefer to have give their slanted view ... it's funny to have people complain about the damn New York Times as some kind of tool of public hypnosis when the vast majority of Americans ain't actually read a newspaper in years, fake news conservative facebook sites are "informing" ridiculous portions of the electorate and Fox News is playing on tv in the majority of McDonalds in the country


What do you think about the below:

Michael Brown - The Undeniable, Glaring Bias of the Mainstream Media

The NYT has print/online version and many older people still read the physical print copy.
 

Long Live The Kane

Tyrant Titan
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
17,318
Reputation
5,059
Daps
65,101
What do you think about the below:

Michael Brown - The Undeniable, Glaring Bias of the Mainstream Media

The NYT has print/online version and many older people still read the physical print copy.

I think that website is an example of what I referred to in my original post, far as the compartmentalism of the media goes ... as far his assertion that there was a lack of coverage of Hilary's goddamned emails :russ: ... or a lack of attention given towards Clinton sex scandals :mjlol:

the general opinion of Hilary is that she is something approaching Satan, and it's mainly due to the media
 

Fillerguy

Veteran
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
21,211
Reputation
5,720
Daps
90,068
Reppin
North Jersey
Do you view the media differently after the election?

Most mainstream was completely in the tank for HRC. Completely, you had outlets like:

Washington Post, NY Times, CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, LA Times and many other media outlets completely in the tank for her. In a democracy, you are supposed to give equal coverage(positive and negative) to both choices. They completely mis-lead the public leading up to the election with complete Anti-Trump propaganda. That is disturbing, and think most of these media outlets are very inter-twined with the powers/globalists that run the world.

I think the media was the biggest loser after HRC loss. Lot of people lost so much respect for them.
Lol why do ppl keep saying the media was favoring Hillary. Trump had the most media time of all the candidates. Why you think he spent so little campaigning? He's had virtually free press for over a year. I have night/evening job. During the day it was Trump news network on CNN/MSNBC/Fox.
If I can recall correctly, one of the big 3s producers came out and said they focused too much on Trump. Every time Trump spoke it was live, and unedited every one else's was recorded or cut down.

Even other candidates were advertising for Trump. Reporters stayed asking Republican candidates for their responses to Trump's comments. Every primary debate was essentially Trump vs the GOP. If anything the media declared Trump the winner months ago.
 

Yakno1

Banned
Joined
Mar 2, 2013
Messages
3,555
Reputation
51
Daps
6,273
Reppin
NULL
Lol why do ppl keep saying the media was favoring Hillary. Trump had the most media time of all the candidates. Why you think he spent so little campaigning? He's had virtually free press for over a year. I have night/evening job. During the day it was Trump news network on CNN/MSNBC/Fox.
If I can recall correctly, one of the big 3s producers came out and said they focused too much on Trump. Every time Trump spoke it was live, and unedited every one else's was recorded or cut down.

Even other candidates were advertising for Trump. Reporters stayed asking Republican candidates for their responses to Trump's comments. Every primary debate was essentially Trump vs the GOP. If anything the media declared Trump the winner months ago.


Be honest, was it positive or negative coverage?
 

StatUS

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,186
Reputation
2,110
Daps
68,820
Reppin
Everywhere
They backed Hillary and did her bidding. It exposed them as shills for the establishment. We knew this but now we have concrete proof.

Everyone from Maddow to John Oliver to the Post and Times backed her 100% with no remorse. It was propaganda.

Not to mention the amount of free media given to Trump to normalize his dangerous candidacy and you've basically got yourself all the evidence needed to show that the MSM is nothing but rich actors with no care for anything but their ratings.
 

Fillerguy

Veteran
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
21,211
Reputation
5,720
Daps
90,068
Reppin
North Jersey
Be honest, was it positive or negative coverage?
Doesn't matter to Billy Bob in bumfukk Alabama. Almost every event of his was shown in its entirety. What ever spin after the fact is irrelevant. Commentators preach to the choir, they don't sway opinions.
 

Yakno1

Banned
Joined
Mar 2, 2013
Messages
3,555
Reputation
51
Daps
6,273
Reppin
NULL
They backed Hillary and did her bidding. It exposed them as shills for the establishment. We knew this but now we have concrete proof.

Everyone from Maddow to John Oliver to the Post and Times backed her 100% with no remorse. It was propaganda.

Not to mention the amount of free media given to Trump to normalize his dangerous candidacy and you've basically got yourself all the evidence needed to show that the MSM is nothing but rich actors with no care for anything but their ratings.



Spot on!
 
Top