Cancel Culture was started by Black Women — the keystone of Black Twitter, and thus originates from Black Twitter —and was coopted by other communities to incrementally address more issue that were adjacent or parallel to the concerns of Black people.
Story sound familiar?
As it grew more prevalent to embody such a number of wide-ranging issues it became more amorphous a concept without an apparent through line or governorship. Those who were most likely to be subject to “cancellations” were least likely to pay attention to these developments as they are use to marginalizing the communities that are effectively “cancelling” people. Which is why this Cac, Other Cacs, Conservatives, and Men’s Men (you Coli Brehs)

are the most frequently “cancelled” and consequently the most bewildered, threatened, and opposed to Cancel Culture.
So yes, it very much does carry racial implications because it is racial in origin. If you were to ask the average cac how they felt they’d probably be 50/50 about it with a strong lean against Cancel Culture. If you ask groups who are not Black nor White, generally speaking, you’d probably see between a 70/30 or 60/40 favorability of Cancel Culture with significant percentages of resistance.
However; with Black people, that conversation isn’t even particularly pertinent to the overall goal. I’d believe if asked the same question there’d be an overwhelming favorability. But the more significant split in the line of discourse is whether the average Black person is indifferent of Cancel Culture or finds it to be a necessity.
Not sure on your stance still OP. Why this Mega Maga Cac is the one to make you ask this question.
I think what breh
@Savvir is trying to say to you is that Cancel Culture, so to speak, is legit. To which I agree, however, since there’s no officiating body to it, anybody can do it, hop in and participate. Which to my point leads to it being coopted and questionable. Although I disagree on it being a distraction, to your point, it can be a problem.