Does daps received or rep say more about a poster?

[observe]

Daps check
Rep check
11 featured threads in 3 months..check
Male Dime piece check

 

[At30wecashout]

Sa'll the same to me.

 

[BrothaZay]

Daps check
Rep check
11 featured threads in 3 months..check
Male Dime piece check

I had 5 feature threads past 2 weeks

 

[Ricky Church]

I only really fukk with posters with mid-level daps/reps because they're not trolls, and they're not dap/rep fishermen either.

and here I thought we had sum'n special breh-breh...

 

[mannyrs13]

I don't think posters that have been here less than a month can decide whether or not they are bad posters yet.

 

[No1]

When thinking somebody is a troll which one helps you make that decision more?


A low number of daps and heavy posts or deep in the red?

All they define is popularity. A lot of horrible posters have high reputation and good post to dap ratios. It just means you have enough people that fukk with you enough to co-sign everything you do.

 

[Oceanicpuppy]

Honestly, what makes a good poster? There is a lot subjectivity that goes into just that.

Some posters here think someone is a bad poster while I may think the are decent posters.

 

[Flash Thunderton]

I don't think posters that have been here less than a month can decide whether or not they are bad posters yet.

I'm the best poster from the November 2014 Class God dammit

 

[mannyrs13]

I'm the best poster from the November 2014 Class God dammit

I've never even heard of you until this thread. must not post in threads I go in much.

 

[onelastdeath]

Daps imo. the better the ratio, the better the poster from what I've seen

 

[Oceanicpuppy]

I'm the best poster from the November 2014 Class God dammit

Man, don't worry that shyt this is a discussion board at most. It's a internet watering hole. It's fruitless endeavor trying to please strangers on the internet. I rather hear peoples real opinions than some internet tap-dance opinion.

 

[Citi Trends]

i assume people with high daps and rep to be safe redundant posters

more posts than daps is kill yourself tier for me

 

[old_timer]

personally i look at workrate (posts per day)

if someone is a casual poster, vaguely positive stats are good enough

but if someone is making 400+ posts every month??
they better have stellar stats
because it is so much easier to be in the dap/rep mix with high workrate
think about it- same people grab a spot on first page of damn near every thread
same people get 5-10 fukking posts on a new topic before the casual posters can even check it once
if you're always skiing on fresh snow, you should have the fastest times

if you come in on the 8th page of a 14 page thread
you gotta have stellar material to even get 2-3 daps
where active posters can drop a -face back on page 1 and get 5 daps
the worst is the "say common-sense, neutral things with neat and tidy paragraphs on first page of every other thread" posters
i mean, way to take risks and break new ground for the discussion
but it racks up +rep nonetheless

i mean, it's cool- it's just an internet message board- everyone can cook, do you, etc.
but if people want to openly pay homage to themselves, i'll be petty enough to point out the flipside of it

 

[Non Sequitur]

and here I thought we had sum'n special breh-breh...

There's exceptions of course

 

[YaBoy]

I think rep is good to determine if a person is a troll because they'll be deep in the red, but dap/post ratio is better for those not in the red. The best posters usually have a good dap/post ratio with a lot of posts & aren't in the red