Dolce And Gabanna still suffering because the Chinese know how to stay on code

knickscity

Superstar
Joined
Mar 29, 2013
Messages
3,272
Reputation
120
Daps
13,917
Reppin
Brooklyn Bed-Stuy
You're right but we have a major spendin power here in America. You can make a company fall back quick and/or put a nice size dent in their profits. You'll get their investors or boards attention quick. All companies care about is profits.

This era dont really understand a boycott overall. Black Americans spend a lot of money in Gucci and Versace. We pull our money out their profits and they would be sendin out discount coupons for us to come back. I say Versace becuz its only a matter of time before their racist customer policy towards blacks is exposed again.
Depends on what you're talking about here. if it's the hurt the pockets, sure we can do that. I think Hilfiger still feels effects for example, but it's not on the level of where an entire country wont fukk with him, and folks outside the country wont model the shyt because it would offend their fanbase.

We don't have that type of impact, but we certainly could do things such as 100% support our own.
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,816
Reputation
2,160
Daps
56,251
The Chinese have an entire economy and a population of a billion ppl. You cant compare them to us.
Stop with the c00n excuses.
If blacks boycotted these brands they’d feel it big time. The difference is you don’t have Chinese/Asian Floyd Mayweathers or young thugs who are bold enough to shyt on their own people by going against the grain and siding with the companies. Everybody else has a code, we don’t.
 

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
23,847
Reputation
7,435
Daps
115,302
This is what it all comes down to. Now let the Juelzing begin.

That is not what it comes down to. The Chinese don't respect themselves anymore than African Americans respect themselves. What it comes down to is that that the Chinese government is helping it's companies engage in industrial espionage, by blocking competitors from their markets and by stealing copyrights, patents and other trade secrets for their companies. I haven't looked it up, but I wouldn't be surprised if there is a Chinese company out there that has not already clipped D&G brands. So of course the Chinese government is going to try to block them in order to help the Chinese companies.

On another note this shows why African nations are having a hard time getting their industries off the ground. African governments and consumers value other countries goods over those that they are able to produce in Africa. Lusting after foreign goods was the backbone of slavery, which in turn allowed colonialism. African economic growth is stunted to this very day by the fact they are not doing what China is doing by blocking competitors in order to grow their own industries.
 

Will Ross

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
24,714
Reputation
-6,058
Daps
59,391
You're right but we have a major spendin power here in America. You can make a company fall back quick and/or put a nice size dent in their profits. You'll get their investors or boards attention quick. All companies care about is profits.

This era dont really understand a boycott overall. Black Americans spend a lot of money in Gucci and Versace. We pull our money out their profits and they would be sendin out discount coupons for us to come back. I say Versace becuz its only a matter of time before their racist customer policy towards blacks is exposed again.

Our dollar don’t make or break a company like Gucci. The asian dollar does
 

Sauce Dab

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 28, 2015
Messages
48,346
Reputation
16,259
Daps
253,466
Our dollar don’t make or break a company like Gucci. The asian dollar does
It don't matter if black people stayed on code. Gucci knew what they were doing. They don't want black people wearing their stuff
 

Cynic

Superstar
Joined
Jan 7, 2013
Messages
16,317
Reputation
2,337
Daps
35,225
Reppin
NULL
Black Americans have extreme spending power in America but we cant stay on code for shyt. Ive been hearin and seeing the same "We gotta stick together" message since the early 90s and still the same shyt. Shyt is sad and draining.

Consumption =/= production. You ever wonder why they don't release white spending power ? :stopitslime:
 

Koapa

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
5,764
Reputation
910
Daps
32,079
Reppin
Arlington, Tx.
Depends on what you're talking about here. if it's the hurt the pockets, sure we can do that. I think Hilfiger still feels effects for example, but it's not on the level of where an entire country wont fukk with him, and folks outside the country wont model the shyt because it would offend their fanbase.

We don't have that type of impact, but we certainly could do things such as 100% support our own.

You point is valid.

Im just saying we could have a similar impact but we dont stay on code. It's been like that since I can remember. Hell in each era throughout American history, it's always been nikkas who refuse to stay on code. You put sum $ in nikkas pockets and they will sambo against the cause.
 

Koapa

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
5,764
Reputation
910
Daps
32,079
Reppin
Arlington, Tx.
Consumption =/= production. You ever wonder why they don't release white spending power ? :stopitslime:

I really dont care about white spending power because for the most part their kids understand financial literacy and the power of the dollar.

Overall we dont. That type of education wasnt taught to each generation for varies reasons. Thats why Im proud to see nikka like Nipsey Hussle spitting real information for the younger blacks to understand.
 

Black Hans

Follow Jesus. Be Beautiful
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
8,390
Reputation
-1,206
Daps
20,433
Reppin
John 14:6
Dolce & Gabbana Is Still Paying for Insulting Chinese Women
Being shunned in the mainland market could be fatal for the brand.
By
Robert Williams
March 7, 2019 at 1:00:25 AM EST Updated on March 7, 2019 at 3:30:31 PM ES
From the red carpets of Hollywood award shows to the catwalks of Paris and Milan, where throngs of photographers chase Instagram-worthy shots of actors, pop stars, and style bloggers sporting the latest look, winter is the season when Gucci, Louis Vuitton, Versace, and other luxury brands make a big business of being in the spotlight.

One name has been notably absent from this year’s glamour parade: Dolce & Gabbana. The iconic Italian brand is still struggling to overcome a backlash that erupted in November over a tone-deaf marketing video and derogatory comments from co-founder Stefano Gabbana about the Chinese. What’s followed is a boycott on the mainland that threatens to snuff out one of fashion’s biggest names.

Online retailers such as Alibaba’s TMall and JD.com Inc. still haven’t reintroduced Dolce & Gabbana on their Chinese sites; Lane Crawford and other high-end department stores pulled the brand’s wares from their stores on the mainland; and the spring issues of influential local magazines like Vogue China feature no D&G ads or products.

The damage hasn’t been limited to China. At both the Golden Globes and the Oscars, where in previous years Sarah Jessica Parker, Scarlett Johansson, and other top talent stepped out in opulent Dolce & Gabbana gowns, no A-lister dared to risk alienating fans by donning the label. “They basically offended an entire country,” says Leaf Greener, a stylist and fashion consultant based in Shanghai and Paris. “Who wants to associate with that?”



China’s Expensive Appetites
Share of global personal luxury goods market, by consumers’ nationality

Data: Bain & Co.

2018 figures are estimates; 2025 figures are Bain forecasts

With Chinese shoppers estimated to account for at least a third of luxury sales and two-thirds of the industry’s growth, the enduring controversy in this key market may pose an existential threat to closely held Dolce & Gabbana. The company doesn’t disclose sales, but an Italian filing showed revenue of €1.3 billion ($1.47 billion) for the year ended March 2018, roughly twice the haul of rival Versace SpA.

Gabbana and his partner Domenico Dolce founded the brand in 1985 with a unique Italian blend—look-at-me dresses bursting with leopard prints and embroidered flowers, skimpy men’s underwear, and advertising campaigns that celebrated a cartoonish version of their country: shouting families, nuns, and sexed-up ingénues arranged in kitschy restaurants, or Sicilian street scenes that looked straight out of The Godfather.

It’s gotten political now. I don’t think people are going to forget”

The duo has weathered—and even seemed to relish—previous controversies. In 2017, Gabbana punched back at detractors of its “Thin & Gorgeous” sneakers as “fat and full of cholesterol.” The company even sold its own $245 “#Boycott D&G” T-shirts to lambaste Americans who denounced it for dressing first lady Melania Trump, a longtime fan. The pair did have to walk back remarks they made criticizing gay families to an Italian magazine in 2015, but that damage pales in comparison with the China meltdown. “It’s gotten political now,” Greener says. “I don’t think people are going to forget.”

Before a planned November runway show in Shanghai, Dolce & Gabbana posted a series of videos featuring a Chinese model awkwardly attempting to eat cannoli, pizza, and other Italian foods with chopsticks. The videos alone might have been forgiven as a crude joke made by a company known for poking fun at its own culture, but leaked messages by Gabbana insulting Chinese people and defending the video provoked a social media firestorm. Making matters worse, the company initially claimed it had been hacked and took days to remove the videos from its Instagram accounts and apologize. Amid the uproar, it was forced to hastily postpone the show.

Three months later, “I still am not seeing anyone wear Dolce,” says Bryanboy, a Filipino fashion influencer and style blogger. While Burberry, Gucci, and Prada have also faced anger for releasing products seen as crude or culturally insensitive, those brands responded quickly to quell any controversy. “This was on another level,” Bryanboy says.

See how they know how to stay on code? This is how you harm racists. You hit their pockets.

:wow:

They respect themselves

Yeah, because black people never called for boycotts on industries :duck:

These two post are examples of anti-blackness being masqueraded as wisdom :wow::camby:
 

Koapa

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
5,764
Reputation
910
Daps
32,079
Reppin
Arlington, Tx.
Our dollar don’t make or break a company like Gucci. The asian dollar does

Our dollar plus social media would cause havoc to their brand. Social media is the most powerful tool since the internet hit the scene.

The Gucci backlash was goin in a good direction until you seen Boosie go against the grain. Say what you want but dude has a strong following. Soulja Boy started tap dancing once Gucci sent him some items. We don't stay on code. This type of c00ning has been occurring within the black community since my grandma was a little girl in the 50's. Check out some real documentaries, you'll be surprised.

Asians still on fukkin script. The group that always stay on script in the US in the Jews and the Republican party. Them mofos stay aligned on the message, whether its right or wrong.
 

Koapa

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
5,764
Reputation
910
Daps
32,079
Reppin
Arlington, Tx.
It don't matter if black people stayed on code. Gucci knew what they were doing. They don't want black people wearing their stuff

Maybe Gucci did or didn't understand what they were doing. That says a lot about their diversity. Gucci aint the only tone deaf company in these streets. Thats why diversity is important especially now with social media. You drop some fukked up marketing if you want. You'll fukk around and cost your company millions or even billions of $$$.
 

Sauce Dab

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 28, 2015
Messages
48,346
Reputation
16,259
Daps
253,466
Maybe Gucci did or didn't understand what they were doing. That says a lot about their diversity. Gucci aint the only tone deaf company in these streets. Thats why diversity is important especially now with social media. You drop some fukked up marketing if you want. You'll fukk around and cost your company millions or even billions of $$$.
They ain't diverse but they knew what they were doing. They feel as if black people bring their value down so they did the blackface thing to get us to stop
 
Top