Donald Trump set to ‘eliminate arts funding programs’, cutting off NPR and PBS

Joined
Dec 3, 2015
Messages
2,309
Reputation
410
Daps
4,941
Donald Trump set to ‘eliminate arts funding programs’, cutting off NPR and PBS
He is notoriously not fond of broadcast media

President-elect Donald Trump is believed to be planning on shutting down arts and heritage programs as part of a raft of budget-tightening measures.


The Hill, whose source is an unnamed member of Trump’s transition team, reported that Trump will eliminate both the National Endowment For The Arts and the National Endowment For The Humanities, and privatise the Corporation For Public Broadcasting.

The latter partially funds National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), currently receiving $445.5 million a year from the government, around half of which goes to the US’ approx. 350 public television stations.

Shutting down the NEA is an idea that dates back to the Reagan administration, though Reagan was ultimately dissuaded from the move by other conservatives.

In response to the news, a heartfelt speech by Fred Rogers before the Senate Subcommittee on Communications from 1969 (above), in which he defends PBS, is being shared this morning.

A White House petition has been set up protesting such budget cuts, but does not appear to be registering signatures.

Trump set to ‘eliminate arts funding programs’, cutting off NPR and PBS

Here’s What Donald Trump’s Arts and Humanities Cuts Would Cost America
Mind you, these cuts would only save us .016 percent of the total budget.
For those liberals who fear what a Donald Trump presidency will look like, Thursday brought no comfort—only horrifying confirmation. According to The Hill, Trump’s administration is preparing to slash basically every program Democrats covet from the budget—including, but not limited to, energy-efficiency programs, initiatives geared toward preventing domestic violence, and civil rights programs. Also on the chopping block? The National Endowment for the Arts (N.E.A.) and the National Endowment for the Humanities (N.E.H.) would be eliminated entirely, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (C.P.B.)—which, in part, funds PBS—would be privatized.

Mind you, the cuts for the arts would do almost nothing to fix the budget deficit: according to Deadline, the total cost for the N.E.A., N.E.H., and C.P.B.—$741 million—make up a measly .016 percent of the total U.S. budget which is ($4.6 trillion). Sure, every dollar counts when you’re trying to save a few bucks—but given how untenable Trump’s savings goals appear to be, these proposed cuts feel more like a vindictive slap in the face to liberals than effective budget measures. The bright side? As The Hill notes, “The budget offices of the various departments will have the chance to review the proposals, offer feedback and appeal for changes before the president’s budget goes to Congress.” Ultimately, it’ll be up to Congress whether these cuts happen or not.

If the arts funding cuts—particularly the proposed privatization of the C.P.B.—sound familiar, it might be because Mitt Romney found himself in hot water for proposing something similar just a few years ago. Remember the presidential debate in which Big Bird improbably became the star of the show? That happened because Romney proposed cutting off taxpayer money to PBS—which, at the time, was home to Sesame Street and its beloved yellow fowl. Now, of course, Big Bird and the gang have flown the coop to HBO in their own controversial maneuver—leaving the arts and humanities without as compelling a mascot for votes to rally behind as Trump and the G.O.P. stand over the federal budget, axes ready.

Before Trump, there was another president who tried to cut funding to the C.P.B.: Richard Nixon. Back when Nixon threatened to slice the C.P.B.’s budget in half—prompting Fred Rogers to mount a stirring defense of what he and others were doing with their meager budgets. (It worked.) And the endowments have faced threats from the G.O.P. before, too—from Ronald Reagan, whom Deadline notes wanted to eliminate the N.E.A. entirely, though he ended up cutting its budget down to half its original size instead.

This issue is about much more than PBS—as worthy of protection as that organization is. With these cuts and budget shifts, NPR—also funded by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting—is equally imperiled. As the Huffington Post notes, “The NEH has supported the creation of 16 Pulitzer Prize-winning books and Ken Burns’s iconic documentary The Civil War.” And if cultural value isn’t something the G.O.P. is willing to consider worthy of taxpayer dollars, it’s also worth pointing out—as Huffington Post does—that the N.E.A. helped get the fledgling Sundance Film Festival started. If you want to talk about millions of dollars worth of economic stimulation, check out last year’s sales, which included awards darling Manchester by the Sea.


Considering how little Trump’s arts cuts would save, it’s hard to imagine they would make up for what they would cost us.

What Donald Trump’s Arts and Humanities Cuts Would Cost America
NPR & PBS don't need that type of funding. We in the internet age & cable company's have 100's of channels now. We no longer fighting for a 37 channel spot.


Anything will be a small percentage out of 4.6 TRILLION DOLLARS.

:mjlol:

This shyt is hilarious , post the author
 

Shogun

Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
25,565
Reputation
6,027
Daps
63,226
Reppin
Knicks
NPR & PBS don't need that type of funding. We in the internet age & cable company's have 100's of channels now. We no longer fighting for a 37 channel spot.


Anything will be a small percentage out of 4.6 TRILLION DOLLARS.

:mjlol:

This shyt is hilarious , post the author
Fair point
 

Ghost_In_A_Shell

Talk No Jutsu
Joined
Sep 30, 2014
Messages
2,746
Reputation
757
Daps
5,643
it explains pbs's move to the right.......with that being said, i hope this orange motherfukker gets the impeachment or the bullet.
 

Kenny West

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
25,279
Reputation
6,225
Daps
93,349
Reppin
NULL
Here is a hidden threat people need to watch out for.

Public funding allows pbs to remain fairly neutral. But if you watch nova and frontline, you'll notice they also get a lot of funding from the Koch foundation. You take away public funding, then Koch can come in and say "hey you want this sweet cash? Make sure to talk or not talk about this". The end goal is to make pbs another corporate whorehouse

Interesting post
 

3rdWorld

Veteran
Joined
Mar 24, 2014
Messages
47,823
Reputation
4,768
Daps
140,081
I hope he cancels welfare next since cacs believe all welfare recipients are Black's.
Cancel it and really fix those poor cacs.
 

Misanthrope

None of the above '16
Joined
Jan 14, 2015
Messages
1,223
Reputation
250
Daps
3,123
Meanwhile, at the same time Voice of America has a $800 million federal budget, 2 Trump campaign workers as temp CEO's and in November, got the right to broadcast inside America.

Trump moves to put his own stamp on Voice of America

President Donald Trump on Monday dispatched two aides to scope out the studios of Voice of America, heightening concerns among some longtime staffers that Trump may quickly put his stamp on the broadcasting arm that has long pushed U.S. democratic ideals across the world.

The arrival of the two aides – both political operatives from Trump’s campaign – comes after Voice of America received blowback over the weekend for sending out a series of tweets about White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer’s claims about inauguration crowd size that looked to some like an endorsement of his false statements. The news outlet later deleted one of the tweets.

The concern among some staffers is especially acute because Trump’s administration is getting control over the broadcasting agency just weeks after Congress moved to eliminate the board of directors that had served as an integrity check on the organization, instead consolidating power with a CEO position appointed by the president.

As POLITICO reported last month, that change – along with a prior shift that allows the network to legally reach a U.S. audience -- had stoked fears among some agency officials that Voice of America could serve as an unfettered propaganda arm for the former reality TV star.

On the first Monday of his administration, Trump, who has flirted with the idea of launching his own TV network, deployed two “transition officials” who will evaluate the managers and studios of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, which has an annual budget of $800 million and includes Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, Radio Free Asia and the Middle East Broadcast Networks.

Trump campaign New Hampshire state director Matthew Ciepielowski and Wisconsin communications director Matthew Schuck will be “temporarily assigned” to the CEO suite at the BBG where they will work with senior management “to ensure an open, transparent and seamless transition of the BBG to the Trump Administration,” according to an email by CEO John F. Lansing to staff obtained by POLITICO.

In a statement to POLITICO on Tuesday, Lansing emphasized the agency's independence.

“The BBG, including Voice of America and our other four networks, is an independent federal agency that is legally mandated to produce objective, professional and independent journalism designed to engage, inform and connect with people around the world in support of freedom and democracy," Lansing said. "As is routine for many federal agencies during any presidential transition, yesterday we welcomed the two-person landing team from the Trump administration. We look forward to working with them as we continue to fulfill our mission, and support the independence of our journalists around the world.”

The timing of the Trump aides' arrival is not necessarily unusual – the Obama administration also sent transition officials to the BBG during his transition in 2009.

But some senior staffers have already expressed reservations about the backgrounds of Trump’s political operatives. Schuck, a 2012 graduate from Montgomery College, was a staff writer for the right-wing website the Daily Surge until April 2015.

“There’s concern among the journalists about what these guys are going to be doing,” said the senior VOA staffer. “People are hanging tight, seeing what will happen.”

A spokesperson for Trump did not respond to a request for comment.

Public scrutiny of the broadcasting agency’s articles has already started.

Voice of America director Amanda Bennett explained that she pulled a tweet on VOA’s official account that featured Spicer’s erroneous statement that “this was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration, period — both in person and around the globe,” following blowback from the account’s 905,000 followers, some of whom argued the agency shouldn’t be promoting his comments without a fact check.

“Irony is that VOA's reason for existing was to provide truth to those who lived where the government controlled the press,” tweeted Stuart Stevens, a former advisor to Mitt Romney’s 2012 presidential campaign, in response to the tweet.

Other Twitter followers called the network “pure propaganda” and “embarrassing,” and urged the network to have “self-respect” for tweeting out Spicer’s words, without additional fact-checking.

Bennett also said she temporarily pulled a story about an ethics complaint lodged against the Trump administration because it didn’t have a response from a Trump representative. The story was reposted later with a comment from Trump’s attorney Sheri Dillon.

Bennett said she was not ordered by the Trump administration to pull the story or the tweet.

“Ever since I arrived here in April I have been extremely firm that we need to follow absolutely the best journalistic practices – which include a diligent focus on facts and objectivity,” Bennett told POLITICO in an e-mail. “For the last nine months, we have been routinely pulling stories that do not meet those standards and asking that they be redone, or that additional reporting be done.”

In a phone conversation later on Monday, Bennett added, "I know that everyone is looking to say that we're being manipulated by the Trump administration, we're absolutely not.”

The Broadcasting Board of Governors is the largest public diplomacy program by the U.S. government, reaching an audience of 278 million by broadcasting in 100 countries and 61 languages. Voice of America was created in 1942 during World War II to send pro-democracy news across Europe, as it aimed to counter Nazi and Japanese propaganda. The agency has since evolved into a more traditional news operation, while still pushing out the virtues of democracy worldwide.

Early last month, a provision buried into the National Defense Authorization Act called for disbanding the bipartisan board of the BBG, pleasing critics who said the part-time board was ineffective but alarming others who feared an accountability layer was being swept away.

A former board member said on Monday that the editorial team may have not received marching orders from the new administration but that they’re aware of the new power of Trump’s team to take over the organization without the firewall of a bipartisan board.

“They’re clearly just trying to stay in stead with their new bosses to keep their jobs,” said the former BBG board member. “If they’re starting to turn this into Pravda before they are even told to.”

The status of the board is in limbo, however, since Obama added a signing statement to the NDAA, saying it was unconstitutional to get rid of the board because it violates his constitutional right of appointment. Another uncertainty is that Lansing can be replaced at any time for a CEO appointed by the president.

At the editorial level, there’s been caution against posting stories that don’t have a response from the Trump administration, according to a senior VOA staffer. “I think there’s going to be more of a focus on making sure that we’re balanced,” the staffer said.

Bennett said she met on Monday with Trump’s representatives, Schuck and Ciepielowski, who she said will not be involved in news decisions.

"I met with them, we gave them a briefing. We're going to be showing them around,” she said. “If people are concerned, a lot of people have been through transitions before and this is standard procedure. We gave them the briefing book."

When asked if she had any concerns about their prior jobs, she said, "They are who they are. They are filling a function that is exactly the same as it would be in any administration."

And Bennett said Voice of America is not changing course under the new administration. "We are trying to do the best journalism we can, and follow the highest journalistic standards is the only way we're going to operate,” she said.
 
Top