This guy has some very brash takes that rub people the wrong way. Especially people who have a more idealistic view of relationships. He has a very cynical view of relationships.
Here he says all (straight) women face these 5 endgames.
1. They keep a high price tag beat out their competitors and secure a high value male. (Says this is very uncommon because high value men don’t have to commit and are the least likely to give women what they want)
2. They lower their price tag in order to beat out their competitors and secure a high value male.
3. They keep a high price tag fail to secure a high value male and settle for less. (Says this is the most common outcome)
4. They lower their price tag fail to secure a high value male and settle for less.
5. They are unpartnered. Unable to secure a high value man and unwilling to settle for less. (Says this is 2nd most likely outcome)
Final argument seems to be most women get the relationship they want (with a perfectly serviceable man) but not the man they would prefer to have it with. Also seems to suggest due to women’s value dropping with age the majority have to settle for less as they age out of being able to even have a chance at the higher value men. They do get the perk of the lower value male having to offer more to compensate for his value.
Laugh at Settling and at anyone who keep believing that shyt