Dr Sanjay Gupta finally sits down with Joe Rogan to set his dumbass straight

Kyle C. Barker

Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
28,218
Reputation
9,494
Daps
121,374
The CNN misinformation thing, Side effects on kids taking the vaccine, Why he shouldn't take the vaccine as a person that already recovered from covid, Marijuana.


I gotchu. Here's my recap

1.) The CNN misinformation thing

For a guy that talks about PC Culture being too sensitive he sure really took it to heart that CNN joked about him taking horse dewormer lol. The problem with Joe here is that he truly believes that Ivermectin cured him despite there not being any double blind studies proving that it actually works with Covid.


2.) Side effects of kids taking the vaccine

This right here was pretty egregious because Joe was actively spreading misinformation right here. During this part of the interview Joe was referencing a truly bad preprint which has 0% chance of being published since all of the data in the preprint referenced VAERs myocarditis data. During this exchange Sanjay also pointed out that myocarditis events don't actually mean that the kids will be hospitalized but Joe had a really hard time understanding that. I mean, he truly struggled with that. I'm not totally sure how someone could cherrypick moments from that exchange to make it look like there was ownage there but these youtube guys are good at spinning things so I guess i shouldn't be too surprised that they managed to do that. Anyways here's the original preprint that Joe referenced:

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination-Associated Myocarditis in Children Ages 12-17: A Stratified National Database Analysis


And here's some critique of that preprint




































3.) Why he shouldn't take the vaccine as a person that already recovered from covid

And I remember this part as well. At this part Joe was pushing the narrative that people that have recovered from covid have better antibodies than vaccinated people. Whether or not that is true is still up for debate

COVID-19 natural immunity versus vaccination

Reduced Risk of Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 After COVID-19...


4.) Marijuana

I barely remember that part tbh. All I really remember is that Sanjay said he smoked once and got paranoid. It was towards the end and I was tuning out by that time.
 

JDZZO2.0

Banned
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
485
Reputation
-598
Daps
1,262
I gotchu. Here's my recap

1.) The CNN misinformation thing

For a guy that talks about PC Culture being too sensitive he sure really took it to heart that CNN joked about him taking horse dewormer lol.


What was the joke? Rogan stated he was prescribed ivermectin by a licensed physician. Ivermectin is a human drug and is prescribed for humans. CNN deliberately lied and stated that Rogan instead took medicine intended for horses. How is that a joke? Did Sanjay say CNN was just joking? No, he admitted that CNN made that up and shouldn't have said that. If a major news network outright lies to their audience to make you look stupid, how is that a joke, and not slander? That is the literal definition of "misinformation" which CNN prides itself on combating against.
 

Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
42,063
Reputation
21,706
Daps
131,141
The CDC reported that there have been a total of 325 deaths in children under 18 related to the flu since the 2018-2019 season.

There were 136 pediatric flu deaths reported during the 2018-2019 season, 188 pediatric deaths reported in the 2019-2020 season and one death during the 2020-2021 season.

For COVID-19, 349 kids have died in the last 18 months, which is when the pandemic began.

This is bad reporting. They're comparing 12-month stats with 18-month stats. They are purposefully and blatantly skewing the data.
 

Taco

All Star
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Messages
4,169
Reputation
553
Daps
11,599
What was the joke? Rogan stated he was prescribed ivermectin by a licensed physician. Ivermectin is a human drug and is prescribed for humans. CNN deliberately lied and stated that Rogan instead took medicine intended for horses. How is that a joke? Did Sanjay say CNN was just joking? No, he admitted that CNN made that up and shouldn't have said that. If a major news network outright lies to their audience to make you look stupid, how is that a joke, and not slander? That is the literal definition of "misinformation" which CNN prides itself on combating against.
They don’t want to hear it. A lot of people here get their news from CNN even though it’s border line Fox just going the other way. Anyone who gets their news from either is a moron.
 
Last edited:

OfTheCross

Veteran
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
43,494
Reputation
4,974
Daps
98,917
Reppin
Keeping my overhead low, and my understand high
:wow:

#1718 - Dr. Sanjay Gupta



Dr. Sanjay Gupta: Why Joe Rogan and I sat down and talked -- for more than 3 hours

By Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN Chief Medical Correspondent



Updated 7:13 AM ET, Thu October 14, 2021



  • [paste:font size="5"]


(CNN)In today's highly segmented media world, most of the people who watch and listen to me every day on CNN have already received and accepted the message about the utility of vaccines, the importance of masks and how we can all work together to put an end to this pandemic. So I realized that if I was serious about trying to communicate public health, I needed to go to a less comfortable place. I needed to go into the lion's den and accept an invitation to sit down with Joe Rogan for more than three hours.

I don't think I have ever had a conversation that long with anyone. Seriously -- think about that. We sat in a windowless podcast booth with two sets of headphones and microphones, and a few feet between us. Not a single interruption. No cellphones. No distractions. No bathroom breaks.



At a time when there is a desire for shorter, crisper content -- responding to abbreviated human attention spans -- one of the most popular podcasts in the country features conversations that last exceptionally long and go particularly deep.
Many friends cautioned me against accepting Joe's invitation. "There is little room for reasonable conversations anymore," one person told me. "He is a brawler and doesn't play fair," another warned. In fact, when I told Joe early in the podcast that I didn't agree with his apparent views on vaccines against Covid, ivermectin and many things in between, part of me thought the MMA, former Taekwondo champion might hurtle himself across the table and throttle my neck. But, instead he smiled, and off we went.
Here is a headline: Joe Rogan agreed to get vaccinated
OK, I am embellishing here, but Joe Rogan is the one guy in the country I wanted to exchange views with in a real dialogue -- one that could potentially be among the most important conversations of this entire pandemic. After listening to his podcasts for a while now, I wanted to know: Was Joe simply a sower of doubt, a creator of chaos? Or was there something more? Was he asking questions that begged to be asked, fueled by necessary suspicion and skepticism?

Into the lion's den
It wasn't what Joe Rogan thinks that most interested me, it was how he thinks. That is what I really wanted to understand.
Truth is, I have always been a naturally skeptical person myself. One of my personal heroes, the physicist Edwin Hubble, said a scientist has a "healthy skepticism, suspended judgment and disciplined imagination, not only about other people's ideas but also about their own."


It's a good way of thinking about the world -- full of honesty and humility. I live by that, and I think Joe may to some extent as well. He will be the first to point out that he is not a doctor or a scientist who has studied these topics. Instead, he seems to see himself less a rapscallion and more of a sort of guardian of the galaxy, pointing out the missteps made by large institutions such as the government and mainstream medicine, and then wondering aloud if they can still be trusted to make recommendations or even mandates for the rest of us. To many, he represents a queen bee in a hive mind, advancing free will and personal liberty above all else.
The free will of your fist ends where my nose begins
When I said this to Joe, the MMA fighter, he paused, sat back and listened for a while. I asked him: Is it not possible to advocate strongly for personal freedoms, but also recognize the unique threat a highly contagious disease represents? He seemed to agree, but then quickly countered with a common misconception about the overall utility of the vaccines.
If vaccinated people transmit just as much as the unvaccinated, why are they really necessary?
It was like Joe and I were now in the octagon, circling one another. He stared at me intently now, eyebrows raised. I admitted that the vaccinated could still carry the virus at similar loads as the unvaccinated, but swiftly added -- before he could claim victory -- that there was more to the story.


I shared data with Joe showing the vaccinated were eight times less likely to become infected in the first place, and that their viral loads came down more rapidly if they did get infected -- making them contagious for a shorter period and less likely to spread the virus.
Vaccines are not perfect, but he had to agree they are certainly a worthy tool to help control the spread of the virus. And, they are particularly effective at keeping people from getting severely ill or dying. They also may help prevent the development of long Covid, a chronic state of illness that some people develop after natural infection, even if their bout with the acute phase of infection was mild.
What he said next surprised me
So, it turns out that Joe Rogan nearly got vaccinated. That was a headline. It was a few months ago when he was in Las Vegas. He had an appointment scheduled but had logistical hurdles and couldn't make it. He offered up this story as proof he is not necessarily "anti-vaccine," even if he does consistently raise issues questioning their legitimacy.
It's this sort of back and forth that makes it hard to pin Joe Rogan down, both in martial arts and a podcast interview.


For example: Even as he sometimes railed against masks, "The Joe Rogan Experience" masks emblazoned with his logo are available for sale on his website. I even bought one ahead of time and gave it to him as a gift. He looked surprised. (Incidentally, they are made in China.)
Despite a downplaying of Covid risks often heard on Joe's podcast, his private studio prioritizes safety. A nurse was present to perform a rapid Covid test before we began. We were even checked for the presence of antibodies with a finger prick blood test.
Both of us carried antibodies -- his from natural immunity, mine from the vaccine. I was vaccinated in December of last year and Rogan contracted Covid at the end of August. Even though this antibody test could only detect the presence of antibodies and not their strength, Joe took great pride in his test, insisting the thickness of his lines must mean stronger immunity. I am fairly certain he was joking. And, I didn't have the heart to tell him that my antibody line was significantly thicker than his anyway.
The nuance of immunity
It bears repeating that no one should choose infection over vaccination. That is the concern many public health officials have had since the earliest days of the pandemic. If nothing else comes out of my conversation with Joe Rogan, I hope at least this point does. Far too many people have become severely ill and died, even after the effective vaccines became available. Just in the last three months, there have been more than 90,000 preventable Covid-19 deaths in the US among unvaccinated adults, according to a new analysis by the Kaiser Family Foundation.
At the same time, an Israeli study garnered a lot of attention after it appeared to show that natural immunity offered significant protection -- even stronger than two doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in people who had never been infected."
So the question Joe raises, as do many others: Why should those who have previously had Covid still get the vaccine?
It's a fair question, and one that I raised myself with Dr. Anthony Fauci back in early September. At the time, he told me there was no firm answer on this, and they were still looking into what the recommendations should be going forward and how durable natural immunity is in the long run."


CDC predicts continued declines in Covid-19 hospitalizations and deaths over next 4 weeks

Part of the issue is that we still don't have a clear idea of how many people have contracted Covid in the United States. The official number is around 45 million, but due to continued lack of sufficient testing, it remains uncertain. And many of the antibody tests that are currently available have high rates of both false negative and false positive results, oftentimes making them unreliable as proof of immunity.
Another issue with natural immunity is that it can vary substantially based on the age of the individual and just how sick they got in the first place. Milder illness in older people often resulted in fewer antibodies being produced.
Some studies have shown between 30 and 40 percent of people who have recovered from Covid did not have detectable neutralizing antibodies at all. That probably explains why a recent study showed that unvaccinated people who already had Covid were more than twice as likely to get reinfected as those who had also been vaccinated.
I told Joe that even in the study from Israel, the authors concluded with the recommendation that people who had recovered from Covid still get a vaccine. And when Joe pushed hard on the risk of myocarditis in kids who receive the vaccine, especially young boys, I countered back equally hard that the risk of myocarditis has been shown to be much higher for infected children under 16 years old compared to their uninfected peers. Those numbers dwarf the risk of myocarditis in kids who receive the vaccine (and, to be sure, most cases of myocarditis can be treated without hospitalization). For me, the risk-benefit analysis is clear: Vaccination is safer than infection.


I guess a small part of me thought I might change Joe Rogan's mind about vaccines. After this last exchange, I realized it was probably futile. His mind was made up, and there would always be plenty of misinformation out there neatly packaged to support his convictions. Truth is though, I am still glad I did it. My three-hour-long conversation wasn't just with Rogan. If just a few of his listeners were convinced, it will have been well worth it.



Why would anyone try to get him to turn it down?

Ain't shyt gonna happen but a conversation and lesson on medicine
 

HarlemHottie

Uptown Thoroughbred
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
18,043
Reputation
11,535
Daps
75,579
Reppin
#ADOS
Dunno what Sanjay Gupta was supposed to say. He isn’t CNN. He wasn’t there representing CNN. He was representing Sanjay and having a conversation. If Rogan’s beef is with CNN then go take it up with leadership there.

Why would Sanjay apologize for CNN? The fukk? Lol
:gucci: Bc Sanjay Gupta is literally CNN's chief medical correspondent and has been for like 20 yrs.

4.) Marijuana

I barely remember that part tbh.
I don't plan to watch, but I did find across this little tidbit on his wiki. Looks like he got a history of just repeating what he's told by big pharma.

in a 2013 editorial, gupta announced that in the process of working on a documentary about marijuana he had changed his mind about the drug's risks and benefits. gupta had previously criticized laws that allowed patient access to medical marijuana, but he reversed his stance, saying, "i am here to apologize," and, "we have been terribly and systematically misled :comeon: for nearly 70 years in the united states, and i apologize for my own role in that"

Sanjay Gupta - Wikipedia
 

vino

Superstar
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
6,180
Reputation
581
Daps
21,757
What was the joke? Rogan stated he was prescribed ivermectin by a licensed physician. Ivermectin is a human drug and is prescribed for humans. CNN deliberately lied and stated that Rogan instead took medicine intended for horses. How is that a joke? Did Sanjay say CNN was just joking? No, he admitted that CNN made that up and shouldn't have said that. If a major news network outright lies to their audience to make you look stupid, how is that a joke, and not slander? That is the literal definition of "misinformation" which CNN prides itself on combating against.


This what you care about? CNN!?!? Fox and CNN are one in the same. Misinformation comes from both these stations and you are focused on that. Theres several different sources to receive news. Sanjay isn’t there defend opinionated news stations
 

Silver Surfer

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,546
Reputation
-4,782
Daps
84,587
Thread title is funny, cuz the opposite narrative is trending on Twitter. That being Sanjay wasn't prepared for Rogan questioning CNN's agenda.

And that singular reason is why he never should have gone....I didn't watch it, but I heard clips.....then I heard Don Lemon got him backtracking......those media doctors always look funny in the light
 

Tom Foolery

You're using way too many napkins.
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
21,933
Reputation
6,706
Daps
92,961
Reppin
Boardwalk and Park Place
I gotchu. Here's my recap

1.) The CNN misinformation thing

For a guy that talks about PC Culture being too sensitive he sure really took it to heart that CNN joked about him taking horse dewormer lol. The problem with Joe here is that he truly believes that Ivermectin cured him despite there not being any double blind studies proving that it actually works with Covid.


2.) Side effects of kids taking the vaccine

This right here was pretty egregious because Joe was actively spreading misinformation right here. During this part of the interview Joe was referencing a truly bad preprint which has 0% chance of being published since all of the data in the preprint referenced VAERs myocarditis data. During this exchange Sanjay also pointed out that myocarditis events don't actually mean that the kids will be hospitalized but Joe had a really hard time understanding that. I mean, he truly struggled with that. I'm not totally sure how someone could cherrypick moments from that exchange to make it look like there was ownage there but these youtube guys are good at spinning things so I guess i shouldn't be too surprised that they managed to do that. Anyways here's the original preprint that Joe referenced:

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination-Associated Myocarditis in Children Ages 12-17: A Stratified National Database Analysis


And here's some critique of that preprint




































3.) Why he shouldn't take the vaccine as a person that already recovered from covid

And I remember this part as well. At this part Joe was pushing the narrative that people that have recovered from covid have better antibodies than vaccinated people. Whether or not that is true is still up for debate

COVID-19 natural immunity versus vaccination

Reduced Risk of Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 After COVID-19...


4.) Marijuana

I barely remember that part tbh. All I really remember is that Sanjay said he smoked once and got paranoid. It was towards the end and I was tuning out by that time.

I'm not the only one seeing it. Even TYT is saying Gupta fukked up.Some of his answers and responses were weak and not strong.

But again I haven't seen the whole thing and maybe never will.I don't listen to Rogan so Gupta looks to have played himself.

 

Kyle C. Barker

Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
28,218
Reputation
9,494
Daps
121,374
What was the joke? Rogan stated he was prescribed ivermectin by a licensed physician. Ivermectin is a human drug and is prescribed for humans. CNN deliberately lied and stated that Rogan instead took medicine intended for horses. How is that a joke? Did Sanjay say CNN was just joking? No, he admitted that CNN made that up and shouldn't have said that. If a major news network outright lies to their audience to make you look stupid, how is that a joke, and not slander? That is the literal definition of "misinformation" which CNN prides itself on combating against.


Bruh, I don't watch CNN and that was the most CNN I had seen in a while. What's even sadder is that I have probably watched Joe Rogan's shyt show more than CNN lol. The 30 second CNN clip that Joe Rogan's assistant pulled up during the show was some CNN commentators making fun of him for taking ivermectin and calling him a dumbass. And honestly it was funny and Joe took offense to it because he really believes that ivermectin is a cure for covid. His conviction became apparent once he started going on a rant about how billions of people have taken it in India to beat covid, something about Brett Weinstein being right about, and how so and so won a Nobel prize for using it. Of course this is the type of stuff you regurgitate when you get your information from Facebook memes.


I'm not the only one seeing it. Even TYT is saying Gupta fukked up.Some of his answers and responses were weak and not strong.

But again I haven't seen the whole thing and maybe never will.I don't listen to Rogan so Gupta looks to have played himself.



I actually agree with Cynk here, Sanjay didn't push back on Joe Rogan's misinformation. Sanjay was not looking to argue, but instead listen to the "other side" so at most he would pepper in a correction here and there but he didn't go all out with it. It was more of a conversation than a debate. During Joe's ivermectin tirade Sanjay did point out that ivermectin is used for parasites but Joe being Joe, probably doesn't understand the difference between a parasite and a virus.

Another thing about the clip you posted, at the 4:15 mark the female host actually bought into misinformation spewed out by Joe because she actually thought joe made a good point about the risk assessment of kids and vaccinations. I actually posted about that preprint study earlier in this thread and it's sad that Joe is constantly amplifying misinformation because this is the after effect of it. Now you got Ana Kasparian saying "Joe has a point about the vaccine being more dangerous for kids than covid
and Sanjay couldn't refute it :ehh:" when Joe's whole point was based on a preprint that will never get published because of how flawed it is.


PubPeer - SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination-Associated Myocarditis in Childr...
 

Kyle C. Barker

Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
28,218
Reputation
9,494
Daps
121,374
This is bad reporting. They're comparing 12-month stats with 18-month stats. They are purposefully and blatantly skewing the data.


Eh, the flu had a 6 month advantage in the comparison and covid still sniped out more kids in a shorter timespan even with mask mandates and online learning.

In any case it was irresponsible for Joe to say the flu was more harmful to kids
 

Pool_Shark

Can’t move with me in this digital space
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
12,715
Reputation
2,065
Daps
26,424
It was a good conversation about Covid and the vaccine. I don’t think anyone really “won”. They would discuss a subject for a bit then move on to another without anyone really trying to win every single argument.

it’s worth a listen, don’t get caught up in what these cheerleaders say, always having you pick a side.
 
Top