Dr Umar Johnson - The Breakfast Club (2nd time)

[scarlxrd]

Around 12:00 "I hope black boys aren't pledging to the flag"

fukk You Umar.

This is MY country as well.

Come up off that bullshyt.

We need to embrace what this country stands for more than anyone else. We've been more patriotic than ANY other group. Hands down.

:kobe1::quiet:

 

[EducatedBrothaFromTheBank]

He's 100% on point about Obama..

He's actually wrong,he didnt even state 1 policy change that would effect black folks

So Obama is supposed to end 500 years of white supremacy

This smart/dumb nikka didnt even speak about how change comes from the local government, wtf Obama gonna do about schools and police when that's a STATE ISSUE

this nikka is a clown

 

[Paradise50]

I mean Obama could've done at least 1 specific thing for blacks like he did mexicans and the lgbt community.


He got NC in a stranglehold over some god damn bathrooms

 

[KingDanz]

Listened again, great information

 

[valet]

Umar is wrong about Obama. Period. Obama has to thread needles every time he opens his mouth.

What do you say to those who feel since its his last year he shouldn't worry about that

 

[Losttribe]

Around 12:00 "I hope black boys aren't pledging to the flag"

fukk You Umar.

This is MY country as well.

Come up off that bullshyt.

We need to embrace what this country stands for more than anyone else. We've been more patriotic than ANY other group. Hands down.

Neg.

How are you patriotic when you aren't actually a citizen with real rights?

Have you joined the military and went to combat for this nation, since you're so pro usa. ?

 

[Losttribe]

quick way to get slaughtered. Supply Lines? Food stores? Weapons/ammo storage?

TBH, anything of that nature is a drone away from oblivion, and even then, if you are using fiat currency in any capacity, you are *not* financially independent.
Its smart-dumb talk that people won't think much about.

He is saying we need to be able to support and replinish troops

How is that smart dumb instead of common sense?

 

[Fani Willis fan]

this 3letter c00n only watches HC docs to boost his self esteem ..after he tap dances for whitey at the office

 

[I_Got_Da_Burna]

He spit that ether about Obama passing more legislation for Non-Citizens than for Black people. That shyt had me like

 

[DJDONTNOBODYPAYME]

I actually could see how all of this could work and come to fruition in our lifetime.

Overnight if you will

 

[At30wecashout]

He is saying we need to be able to support and replinish troops

How is that smart dumb instead of common sense?

Common sense says the only possible way it would accomplish anything of worth is if some mega paradigm shift takes place in which the U.S. cant retaliate with sheer overwhelming force. By that I mean something along the lines of:

1. Total economic collapse. Not a recession, and not a depression, cause wartime tends to be a stimulus rather than an economic drag. The U.S. Outspends other countries in military might for very specific reasons, one of which is to throw its dikk right on the plate of anyone else eating. For the sake argument, lets say the plot is to drop a few specific location on some agitative shyt. Assuming the US doesnt catch wind via surveillance or snitching, any act of terrorism(which it would be) makes things escalate from a local law enforcement issue to an Executive Branch issue, brought to you by the Commander-in-chief. Game the fukk over. What wont be hit militarily will be hit economically through no-fly zones and sanctions, crippling the commerce of whatever funds such foolishness. Best believe countries would give that shyt up quick in order to not fall under economic sanction.
Anyone smaller than Russia or China is not saying no to the USA. Unless the USA is flat broke Nd fighting multiple enemies on all fronts, aint no baby strike gonna go without severe consequences, probably snuffing the independence right out from folks, again, possibly under simple drone strikes. The game has changed. There is no winning when you try to take the weapons route.

In fact, thats all the example I need. Any moves toward a mindset change that could accumulate the kinda wealth to pull that shyt off would immediately come under INTERNATIONAL scrutiny, even if the entire diaspora came together. Folks dont seem to remember how dirty the government can do folks. There is no winning, under the current economic system, when it comes to war. Before computers and the kinda shyt the US got today, maybe. Now? Nope. Especially with fiat currency. The world markets and deny your shyt outright, or refuse trade wit nations that deal in alternate currency that they cant profit from. There is so much more to consider that I wonder if anyone here has taken even a passing interest in economics and warfare.

 

[Losttribe]

Common sense says the only possible way it would accomplish anything of worth is if some mega paradigm shift takes place in which the U.S. cant retaliate with sheer overwhelming force. By that I mean something along the lines of:

1. Total economic collapse. Not a recession, and not a depression, cause wartime tends to be a stimulus rather than an economic drag. The U.S. Outspends other countries in military might for very specific reasons, one of which is to throw its dikk right on the plate of anyone else eating. For the sake argument, lets say the plot is to drop a few specific location on some agitative shyt. Assuming the US doesnt catch wind via surveillance or snitching, any act of terrorism(which it would be) makes things escalate from a local law enforcement issue to an Executive Branch issue, brought to you by the Commander-in-chief. Game the fukk over. What wont be hit militarily will be hit economically through no-fly zones and sanctions, crippling the commerce of whatever funds such foolishness. Best believe countries would give that shyt up quick in order to not fall under economic sanction.
Anyone smaller than Russia or China is not saying no to the USA. Unless the USA is flat broke Nd fighting multiple enemies on all fronts, aint no baby strike gonna go without severe consequences, probably snuffing the independence right out from folks, again, possibly under simple drone strikes. The game has changed. There is no winning when you try to take the weapons route.

In fact, thats all the example I need. Any moves toward a mindset change that could accumulate the kinda wealth to pull that shyt off would immediately come under INTERNATIONAL scrutiny, even if the entire diaspora came together. Folks dont seem to remember how dirty the government can do folks. There is no winning, under the current economic system, when it comes to war. Before computers and the kinda shyt the US got today, maybe. Now? Nope. Especially with fiat currency. The world markets and deny your shyt outright, or refuse trade wit nations that deal in alternate currency that they cant profit from. There is so much more to consider that I wonder if anyone here has taken even a passing interest in economics and warfare.

I liked that you laid out your pov in an intelligent manner.
I would rep you but I think I may have already negged you.

 

[At30wecashout]

I liked that you laid out your pov in an intelligent manner.
I would rep you but I think I may have already negged you.

Its all good. I had to cut it short, actually, cause this is a subject I can go on all day about.
Unfortunately, not many other people will. They think "get independent: go to war" without thinking of the implications of that. If someone wants his people wiped out outright, thats a surefire way to do it, and nothing will be gained.

There is a reason the usa tries its damndest to make military service seem like the most honorable thing in the world, and thats because the dirt that gets done needs to be spun 24/7. Anyone advocating warring with the gorilla is a fukking fool.

Anyway, take this rep

 

[DJDONTNOBODYPAYME]

I liked that you laid out your pov in an intelligent manner.
I would rep you but I think I may have already negged you.

Nothing about that is intelligent. Its not a sound way to see it. He lacks forethought and it sounds a bit cac'ish



He doesn't even know what or who he's talking about. He's too wrapped up in the Brand and not the Product itself

 

[At30wecashout]

Nothing about that is intelligent. Its not a sound way to see it. He lacks forethought and it sounds a bit cac'ish



He doesn't even know what or who he's talking about. He's too wrapped up in the Brand and not the Product itself

So what you are saying is, there is a sure-fire way to "put one over" on a country who spends more on its military than a lot of countries produce in GDP?

Tell me what war hasn't USA been overpowered in since WW2? Vietnam is one exception due to homefield advantage.

Guess which home African Americans live in