Drake Initiates Legal Action Against UMG...files defamation suit against UMG over being a pedophile. Universal responds (Update: Filed Appeal)

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,932
Reputation
5,397
Daps
72,385
You really see how much of a bytch he is when you realize he could've directly sued Kendrick for defamation. He chose not to because on top of it being a blatant hoe move, he didn't want to risk Kendrick and his legal team actually proving any of those claims true. So he took this route to find "dirt" on the backend and still not have his business exposed.

Fam, this nikka should not be allowed to thrive in Hip Hop anymore. This is unfathomable levels of bytch made.
Nah, he didn’t want to look like he was suing over the battle. He’s effectively saying I didn’t lose yall cheated.
 

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
17,487
Reputation
3,583
Daps
57,595
Reppin
CALI
Really just feels like a fishing expedition at this point. He wanted the contract information so he could add some shyt into his sub disses and to make himself feel better about making more money. He wants playlist and other info so he can demand that shyt in his next contract (spoiler alert: UMG already does all that for him).

He has to prove defamation while magically explaining how Family Matters isn't defamation. I just can't possibly fathom this working legally.
Im certain these major record labels do thorough investigations on the artist they sign in order to clean up their image and hide the skeletons.


This seems like Drake is trying to force UMG to reveal any potentially damaging information they found on Kendrick as a last ditch effort to get some type of proof of what he claimed. Like he's trying to force the label to prove his allegations for him.
 

KingsnBucs1987

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
21,139
Reputation
2,402
Daps
29,485
Reppin
Indianapolis
How did Dot/UMG cheat if he fed them the information :mjgrin:
shyt that and he gave Kendrick the big Joker, by telling him to say that he likes them young, Kendrick said aite.

I'm interested in what UMG does since Drake said to use his criminal record, i wonder if UMG brings up the settlement Drake did when he paid some chick like 300k when she claimed sexual assault.

Yeah you didn't get pinched, but why you paying 300k if you didn't do anything wrong.
 

QBN

All Star
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Messages
1,849
Reputation
726
Daps
6,776
There’s no way a grown man with integrity can keep defending this shyt :mjlol:
You really have to look yourself in the mirror and ask yourself how you are a fan of a mutt bytch that has ties to
The Hells Angels
Adin Ross
A fan of Andrew Tate
Asks for a paternity test on another man’s child
Cancellations of a tour not selling
Had a boogeyman save him from a surgical summer
Well documented weird behavior with underage women in 4k and Dolby Surround Sound
Known for fukking nikkas chicks and smiling in they face
Free styling off a blackberry
Getting peed on
Running to social media and calling another rapper a racist to his mother
Crying about a damn sandwich
Fakes mandem talk while saying it’s beneath him
Tried to put America against the UK
I mean look at all this shyt in digital print and tell me with a straight face you can defend this shyt:mjlol:
fukk all the ligation shyt
What this piss colored fakkit is doing would get you murked in the real world
Talking on a nikkas wife and children is an automatic death sentence to civilians
This tiny hat really is privileged and can’t read the room
If you support this
Then I know what and who you are as a person off this forum:mjgrin::mjpls:

That part! He behaves like an emotional adolescent and it's shocking to see grown men including 40 year old podcasters defend his behavior.
 

FOUR_ONE_TWO

All Star
Joined
Nov 24, 2016
Messages
503
Reputation
249
Daps
2,913
Reppin
Houston, by way of Pittsburgh.
Nah, he didn’t want to look like he was suing over the battle. He’s effectively saying I didn’t lose yall cheated.

I know that's part of it. However, he had the option to go at the source and he didn't.

Now, ask your self why this bytch made mf wouldn't make Kendrick prove everything he said was true? If you're not a pedophile, if you're not trafficking women/girls, if you don't have a secret child...why let that shyt slide on a legal level? Furthermore, if everything Drake alleged about Kendrick was true, then there should be no problem with both parties throwing everything on the table and backing up what they said during the battle. Why is Drake putting the burden on UMG to provide proof or dirt on Kendrick Lamar if he already knew/had said proof?

The only thing that makes sense to me is that Drake is a liar, and he wants to be able to sling mud and not have his shyt aired out at the same time. How anybody respects a man like that is baffling.
 

King Jove

King Of †he Gawds
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
33,686
Reputation
10,785
Daps
206,119
Reppin
[redacted]
I haven't been as anti-Drake as some of his most vicious haters, but this is enough for me to never voluntarily stream his music ever again.

This is the most bytchmade shyt I've ever seen in hip-hop history.

Makes you respect Meek even more because he took that L on his chin like a man.
 
Last edited:

Mastamimd

Ain't shyt
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
32,189
Reputation
12,014
Daps
135,217
Reppin
Houston
I haven't been as anti-Drake as some of his most vicious haters, but this is enough for me to never voluntarily stream his music ever again>

This is the most bichmade shyt I've ever seen in hip-hop history.

Makes you respect Meek even more because he took that L on his chin like a man.

No rapper in hip hop history comes close to doing something this bytch made unless I'm missing something

Drake is trying to get some win where even if he gets some semblance of a victory his legacy is tarnished forever because most people already have their minds made up. And it gives mad people ammo to use against him in the future. I know he's going scorched earth but once the smoke clears no one will take him seriously as a rapper. Iceman will be post poned indefinitely because he really really wants a win(Anita Max win hehe) but he's gone too far.
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
56,088
Reputation
21,607
Daps
306,398
Im certain these major record labels do thorough investigations on the artist they sign in order to clean up their image and hide the skeletons.


This seems like Drake is trying to force UMG to reveal any potentially damaging information they found on Kendrick as a last ditch effort to get some type of proof of what he claimed. Like he's trying to force the label to prove his allegations for him.
True but Drake said UMG/Interscope hired a PR crisis team to bury it, which means he's claiming Kendrick beat his girl at some point between GKMC and last year.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,932
Reputation
5,397
Daps
72,385
I know that's part of it. However, he had the option to go at the source and he didn't.

Now, ask your self why this bytch made mf wouldn't make Kendrick prove everything he said was true? If you're not a pedophile, if you're not trafficking women/girls, if you don't have a secret child...why let that shyt slide on a legal level? Furthermore, if everything Drake alleged about Kendrick was true, then there should be no problem with both parties throwing everything on the table and backing up what they said during the battle. Why is Drake putting the burden on UMG to provide proof or dirt on Kendrick Lamar if he already knew/had said proof?

The only thing that makes sense to me is that Drake is a liar, and he wants to be able to sling mud and not have his shyt aired out at the same time. How anybody respects a man like that is baffling.
Doesn’t really work like that. Nothing is stopping UMG from asking for the same evidence from him regarding the timeline of his conversations and relationships with minors or women that close to it in age. There’s nothing from that asking for discovery to validate everything said in the lead up to Not Like Us that would lead someone to reasonably conclude what K Dot did. The same questions Kendrick could ask - they could ask. He didn’t say Kendrick because he thought his “it’s bigger than music” angle would resonate and it’s not because the influencers ain’t on his side and UMG not paying anymore. UMG simply expected this dumb shyt to be dismissed and didn’t know that he would go this far. They’re going to object to most of his demands as irrelevant and the judge will have to force them if he thinks it is.
 
  • Dap
Reactions: rlg

5n0man

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
17,487
Reputation
3,583
Daps
57,595
Reppin
CALI
True but Drake said UMG/Interscope hired a PR crisis team to bury it, which means he's claiming Kendrick beat his girl at some point between GKMC and last year.
I believe Drake heard that story about Top Dawg and assumed it was about kendrick, but he didn't have proof so he's trying to force UMG to reveal anything they know. TDE did hire a crisis management team to clean up Top beating his girl, and that story was scrubbed from the internet.
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
56,088
Reputation
21,607
Daps
306,398
I believe Drake heard that story about Top Dawg and assumed it was about kendrick, but he didn't have proof so he's trying to force UMG to reveal anything they know. TDE did hire a crisis management team to clean up Top beating his girl, and that story was scrubbed from the internet.

Kendrick was also in some legal shyt between DAMN and Mr. Morale as he removed himself from the label. I'd imagine Drake or his team were wondering why did Kendrick take so long to drop an album, why was he in court, etc. And that period coincides with Top's (alleged) period of abusing that woman so it makes sense Drake would get it confused.
 
Top