All this because I said Tate would beat his ass (he a man, talking down on another man)
Because it's funny to see you repeatedly claim you're not on the right, but then you jump to bat for every right-wing narrative.
You're the one who started this interaction. And you're still not explaining why you felt that defending Tate in such a juvenile way was the most important thing you could say in this conversation.
why do you have these gay ass photos saved and continue to use them ? what purpose do they serve ? Why do you know what to google for these to pop up ?
"andrew tate construction workers"
"andrew tate robe"
They serve the purpose of mocking tate in the exact places his fans are most insecure. We've done the logical arguments thing with him already, pointing out the misogyny, the right-wing bullshyt, the criminal behavior, and all the rest. Anyone who defends him still at this point is beyond logic. So I use ridicule.
"he doubled down on the Pelosi's gay lover attack" I never once did this. I said back then it was fair to question what happened.
It was insanely ridiculous to claim, with zero evidence whatsoever, that the crazy guy who brained Pelosi with a hammer was some sort of secret lover over at an old man's house at 3am. All of the evidence pointed against it. You only believed it because you listen to the right-wing echo chamber.
" Fauci fraud" I stand by this
Yet you don't have the slightest evidence, or capacity for evidence. Someone who almost failed out of high school and who still can't define "median" after it was explained to him four times is trying to claim he can judge who is and isn't an accurate medical scientist. You believe Fauci is a fraud because right-wingers told you so.
"Covid overcount" I stand by this
Yet when I give you numerous articles and studies showing that you're completely full of shyt, including the state-by-state excess death counts which are WAY over the official Covid counts, you're silent.
You believe there's a covid overcount solely because the right-wing echo chamber told you to believe it. You have ZERO evidence for an actual overcount.
" Democrat-run Arizona" well Arizona is blue so...

are you just going complete retard today ?
Arizona had a Republican governor, senate, and house when they set the covid rules that you claimed were "Democrat". So far, in order to deny that, you've tried:
* "But the governor is a democrat now!" (she didn't take office until 2 years after our conversation)
* "But the counties decided the rules!" (except the counties were also run by republicans)
* "But the state voted blue!" (a 0.2% margin against Trump has nothing to do with who runs the state. Is Georgia a Democrat-run state too?)
The only manner in which I'm going complete retard is the fact that I'm engaging with such a consistently proven liar.