Drake's bloated 21-track album aimed at gaming the streaming system to move 250K first week

Kenzo Ten

Pro
Joined
Nov 15, 2014
Messages
622
Reputation
-188
Daps
2,106
Okay. So you think Kendrick gonna have a Grammy, Super Bowl and a beef push every year moving forward?šŸ¤£šŸ˜‚ enjoy the stimulus and PRAY to god Drake don’t get that World Cup halftime. You think the Super Bowl push was big? World Cup is a different animal.
This is the 3rd time Kendrick ties the record of winning 5 grammy awards in a single day... He didn't need Drake for this :dead:
 
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
280
Reputation
-84
Daps
350
Reppin
NULL
For those genuinely following along, let’s clarify the contradictions that have been repeatedly overlooked. Understanding how different sales strategies influence first-week numbers is key to an honest discussion.

1. Contradicting Themselves on Sales Models
• At first, the claim was that sales models don’t matter—Drake and The Weeknd simply had ā€œdifferent results,ā€ nothing more.
• But later, streaming manipulation was brought up as a factor, which directly contradicts the idea that sales models are irrelevant.
• The same person also pointed out that Drake’s long albums boost streams, further confirming that different strategies shape sales outcomes.
• So which is it? Either sales models don’t matter, or they do—but both positions can’t be true at the same time.

2. Ignoring the Clear Difference in Sales Strategies
• Yes, Drake sold physical copies—but scale and intent matter.
• Drake’s album was 90.2% streaming-based (222K out of 246K).
• The Weeknd’s was 73% physicals and pre-orders (359K out of 490.5K).
• These are completely different release strategies, which is why The Weeknd’s second-week sales collapsed by over 70%, while Drake’s numbers are expected to hold steadier based on historical trends.
• Stacking pre-orders, multiple vinyl variants, and signed CDs front-loads first-week sales, while streaming-driven albums rely on sustained engagement for longevity.
• Rather than addressing this clear difference in strategy, the conversation instead shifted to accusations of ā€œstreaming manipulationā€ā€”which only reinforces the core argument.

3. Deflecting With Streaming Manipulation
• Instead of acknowledging these differences, the argument pivoted to ā€œDrake benefits from streaming manipulation.ā€
• But this actually reinforces the argument—because if streaming tactics affect first-week sales, then so do pre-order stacking, vinyl variants, and signed CDs.
• You can’t claim one tactic is unfair while ignoring another that clearly played a role in boosting first-week numbers.

At the end of the day, the facts don’t change—only the excuses do. A fair discussion requires consistency, not moving the goalposts when the argument falls apart.
 

LiveFromLondon

Superstar
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
7,690
Reputation
447
Daps
18,120
Thats the difference between Kendrick and Drake, everything Kendrick releases is universal acclaim status, and what he knows ain't good enough for that standard goes straight to the bin.

Drake on the other hand releases eveything he has and he ended up with only 1 good album...and about 14 trash projects.
Acclaim from white liberals and moist shea butter Twitter, the sheer antithesis of TheColi
 

derro13

Superstar
Joined
Nov 15, 2014
Messages
2,336
Reputation
-39
Daps
12,716
Blackballed on streaming and Radio the 2nd most important metric on the charts and still went #1šŸ¤£šŸ˜‚šŸ‘‡šŸ¾šŸ‘‡šŸ¾šŸ‘‡šŸ¾


Dumbass...every album only get 1/2% airplay upon release.

GNX and FATD only got 2% first week.

GdvCu16aMAAl59u
 
Top